Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what guidance his Department has issued to GP practices on the maximum duration for which fit notes may be issued.

Answered by Andrew Western - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Department has published guidance on GOV.UK for any healthcare professionals eligible to issue fit notes. The guidance states that the length of a fit note depends on the healthcare professional’s clinical judgement. During the first six months of a patient’s health condition, a fit note can be issued for a maximum of three months at a time. Where the condition has lasted for more than six months, a fit note can be issued for any clinically appropriate period, up to an indefinite period. Further information is available in the fit note guidance for healthcare professionals and the detailed guide to completing the fit note.

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the volume price promotion restrictions in the Food (Promotion and Placement) (England) Regulations 2021 on food price inflation for households.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

A final impact assessment was published on 1 October 2025 in relation to these restrictions and is available online at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/restricting-volume-price-promotions-of-hfss-products

The published equality impact assessment is also available at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/restricting-promotions-of-food-and-drink-that-is-high-in-fat-sugar-and-salt/outcome/restricting-promotions-of-products-high-in-fat-sugar-and-salt-by-location-and-by-price-equality-assessment

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of administrative errors on litigants in person seeking to access justice.

Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) recognises that administrative errors have the potential to affect access to justice by causing delays, confusion or inconvenience to court and tribunal users, including litigants in person. HMCTS has procedures and safeguards in place to minimise errors, identify and rectify issues when they occur, and support users throughout their case.

Where court and tribunal users, including litigants in person, are unhappy with the service they have received from us, they can make a complaint, as detailed in our complaints procedure online: Complaints procedure - HM Courts & Tribunals Service - GOV.UK

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking to reduce the incidence of lost applications and documents within HM Courts and Tribunals Service.

Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has and continues to reduce the risk of applications and documents being lost through the continued digitisation of court and tribunal services and the use of secure electronic case management systems. These systems provide auditable records of documents submitted and received, reducing reliance on paper-based processes and improving document tracking.

HMCTS also has proven processes in place to investigate reports of missing documentation and take appropriate remedial action where required. Where a document is reported missing, HMCTS undertakes enquiries to trace the document through relevant case management systems and operational records and, where necessary, works with court and tribunal users to obtain replacement documentation.

Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what steps he is taking to work towards the phasing out of animal testing.

Answered by Chris McDonald - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

I refer the Hon Member to the answer provided on 8 September 2026 in response to Question 23800.

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what discussions she has had with the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman on complaints concerning GP practices that are not investigated due to resource prioritisation policies.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) is an independent body, accountable to Parliament, and ministers cannot comment on or intervene in its decision making. In deciding which complaints to investigate the PHSO takes a range of factors into account including the severity of injustice, wider public benefit, and potential systemic issues to ensure the best use of its resources. Further information on how cases are prioritised is available on the PHSO’s website.

Every patient should receive the highest standard of care from the National Health Service, and where this is not the case there are a number of ways in which patients can raise concerns. This includes the NHS complaints process where complaints can be made to the provider of NHS care or to the commissioning body that funds the service. Patient Advice and Liaison Services can help to resolve concerns informally, while the Friends and Family Test provides patients with the ability to provide feedback and to rate their experience. Where concerns are about the safety or quality of a service, they can be brought to the attention of the Care Quality Commission as the independent regulator of health and social care in England or the relevant professional regulator where concerns are about a medical or healthcare professional.

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what alternative routes of redress are available to patients whose complaints about NHS primary care services are not investigated by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) is an independent body, accountable to Parliament, and ministers cannot comment on or intervene in its decision making. In deciding which complaints to investigate the PHSO takes a range of factors into account including the severity of injustice, wider public benefit, and potential systemic issues to ensure the best use of its resources. Further information on how cases are prioritised is available on the PHSO’s website.

Every patient should receive the highest standard of care from the National Health Service, and where this is not the case there are a number of ways in which patients can raise concerns. This includes the NHS complaints process where complaints can be made to the provider of NHS care or to the commissioning body that funds the service. Patient Advice and Liaison Services can help to resolve concerns informally, while the Friends and Family Test provides patients with the ability to provide feedback and to rate their experience. Where concerns are about the safety or quality of a service, they can be brought to the attention of the Care Quality Commission as the independent regulator of health and social care in England or the relevant professional regulator where concerns are about a medical or healthcare professional.

Found: David Baines (Labour; St Helens North) Lee Barron (Labour; Corby and East Northamptonshire) Mr Peter Bedford

Found: In oral evidence, Dr Ben Worthy pointed us to a series of WPQs asked by Peter Bedford MP in 2025, about

Found: David Baines (Labour; St Helens North) Lee Barron (Labour; Corby and East Northamptonshire) Mr Peter Bedford

Found: David Baines (Labour; St Helens North) Lee Barron (Labour; Corby and East Northamptonshire) Mr Peter Bedford

Found: David Baines (Labour; St Helens North) Lee Barron (Labour; Corby and East Northamptonshire) Mr Peter Bedford

Found: David Baines (Labour; St Helens North) Lee Barron (Labour; Corby and East Northamptonshire) Mr Peter Bedford

Found: 10009794 Perth High School Viewlands Road, Perth United Kingdom PH1 1HB Wider Public Sector 10009798 Peter Bedford

Found: 10009794 Perth High School Viewlands Road, Perth United Kingdom PH1 1HB Wider Public Sector 10009798 Peter Bedford

Found: 10009794 Perth High School Viewlands Road, Perth United Kingdom PH1 1HB Wider Public Sector 10009798 Peter Bedford

Found: 10009794 Perth High School Oakbank Road, Perth United Kingdom PH1 1HB Wider Public Sector 10009798 Peter Bedford

Found: 10009794 Perth High School Viewlands Road, Perth United Kingdom PH1 1HB Wider Public Sector 10009798 Peter Bedford

Found: 10009794 Perth High School Viewlands Road, Perth United Kingdom PH1 1HB Wider Public Sector 10009798 Peter Bedford

15 million working-age people are not saving enough for sufficient retirement income, with low-earners most likely to be among them. But both they and small businesses feel the most pain from contribution increases.