Information between 6th March 2026 - 16th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 311 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 203 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 292 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 161 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 283 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Priti Patel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 292 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Bahrain: Iran
Asked by: Priti Patel (Conservative - Witham) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what mechanisms within the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement are being utilised to support Bahrain’s defence against Iranian attacks. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The Government has condemned Iran's reckless attacks across the region, including on Gulf partners who are not party to the conflict, and remains firmly committed to their security. That commitment is reflected in the US‑UK‑Bahrain C‑SIPA defence pact. Within the auspices of C-SIPA, the UK Chief of Defence Staff spoke with Bahraini National Security Advisor (NSA) His Highness Sheikh Nasser bin Hamad Al Khalifa and with US CENTCOM Commander Admiral Cooper on 5 March, with both the UK and US reaffirming support for Bahrain. The Prime Minister spoke with His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa on 5 March to offer defence support, including RAF Typhoons deployed in theatre. We remain closely engaged with the US on the regional situation and will continue to defend Bahrain, our allies, and UK interests. |
|
Bahrain: Iran
Asked by: Priti Patel (Conservative - Witham) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what discussions she has had with her US counterparts about activating provisions in the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement to support Bahrain’s defence against Iranian attacks. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The Government has condemned Iran's reckless attacks across the region, including on Gulf partners who are not party to the conflict, and remains firmly committed to their security. That commitment is reflected in the US‑UK‑Bahrain C‑SIPA defence pact. Within the auspices of C-SIPA, the UK Chief of Defence Staff spoke with Bahraini National Security Advisor (NSA) His Highness Sheikh Nasser bin Hamad Al Khalifa and with US CENTCOM Commander Admiral Cooper on 5 March, with both the UK and US reaffirming support for Bahrain. The Prime Minister spoke with His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa on 5 March to offer defence support, including RAF Typhoons deployed in theatre. We remain closely engaged with the US on the regional situation and will continue to defend Bahrain, our allies, and UK interests. |
|
Railway Stations: Information
Asked by: Priti Patel (Conservative - Witham) Friday 13th March 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether any costs were incurred by updating railway station announcements to convey a message from the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The cost of loading and subsequently removing the announcement was £350; this was proportionate as a means of informing passengers about the freeze of regulated rail fares.
|