Information between 10th October 2026 - 30th October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 306 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over Extension) - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 179 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 193 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 304 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291 |
|
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 107 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 105 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Paul voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Police: Workplace Pensions
Asked by: Rebecca Paul (Conservative - Reigate) Tuesday 27th October 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether McCloud remedy compensation arrangements provide for financial losses incurred by police officers whose applications to restore opted-out pension service were accepted but whose pension rights were not restored in time for their intended retirement date; and what steps her Department is taking to ensure that affected officers are not financially disadvantaged. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) The Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Act 2022 and associated police pension regulations established the framework for implementation of the McCloud remedy in the Police Pension Scheme. On 26 March 2026, I made a Written Ministerial Statement confirming that changes will be made for a small cohort of members who opted out of the scheme before the remedy period and were therefore unable to benefit fully from the intended effect of the legislation. This cohort includes members whose opted-out service had not been restored in time for their intended retirement date. Members eligible for the McCloud remedy may also be entitled to claim compensation for certain financial losses arising from its implementation. It is for the relevant scheme manager to consider such claims. |
|
Patients: Safety
Asked by: Rebecca Paul (Conservative - Reigate) Tuesday 13th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether she plans to extend access to independent investigations beyond maternity services to patients who have suffered serious harm in NHS care and remain dissatisfied with local investigations; and whether her Department is considering the adoption of a Harmed Patient Pathway to ensure patients and families can access explanations, support, accountability and independent scrutiny. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Patients who have suffered serious harm in National Health Service care are entitled to use the NHS complaints system. Where patients are dissatisfied with the investigation of their complaint, they can refer their complaint to the independent Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, whose role is to investigate and make final decisions on unresolved NHS complaints. |
|
Sports: Women
Asked by: Rebecca Paul (Conservative - Reigate) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps she is taking to ensure that guidance issued by the national sports councils is consistent with the Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport) Following the Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers and the updated Equality and Human Rights Commission Code of Practice, which came into force on 5 August 2026, the Sports Councils agreed that the Transgender Inclusion in Domestic Sport Guidance should be reviewed.
Sport England is leading work on behalf of the Home Country Sports Councils to commission an independent review, which will consider the latest scientific, medical and policy evidence to ensure future guidance reflects the current legal framework.
|
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
12th October 2026
Rebecca Paul (Conservative - Reigate) 3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) - £472.00 Source |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Business without Debate
0 speeches (None words) Wednesday 21st October 2026 - Commons Chamber |
| Parliamentary Research |
|---|
|
Courts and Tribunals Bill 2026-27: Progress of the bill - CBP-12221
Oct. 08 2026 Found: Rebecca Paul (Conservative), Joe Robertson (Conservative) and Yasmin Qureshi (Labour) also spoke against |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 4th November 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The Work of the Department for Education At 10:00am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Lucy Powell MP - Secretary of State at Department for Education View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th October 2026 9:45 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Children and Young People's Mental Health At 10:00am: Oral evidence Arjan Bains - Senior Operations Manager at Compass UK Michelle Hill - Group Chief Executive at Talk Listen Change Jordan Letts - Chief Executive at Northampton Saints Foundation John Poyton OBE - co-founder and CEO at The Well Centre Charity View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th October 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th November 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The use of Artificial Intelligence and EdTech in Education At 10:00am: Oral evidence Chris Loveday - Interim Chief Operating Officer and Deputy Principal at City of Portsmouth College Mary Meekings - Head of Equality and Policy at University and College Union (UCU) Ben Rowland - Chief Executive Officer at Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) Cath Sezen - Senior Policy Manager at Association of Colleges (AoC) At 11:00am: Oral evidence Charlotte Armstrong - Policy Manager at The Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) Michael Webb - Director of AI at JISC Lewis Wilson - Vice President Higher Education at National Union of Students (NUS) Professor Simon Banks - Vice Dean Education at King’s College London View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 17th November 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Private Meeting Subject: Children and Young People's Mental Health View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
22 Oct 2026
Preparing for Votes at 16: The Role of the Education System Education Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The Committee is exploring how the education system should adapt to prepare young people to be active and informed citizens in preparation for the introduction of votes at 16. This includes the role of schools and colleges in supporting pupils to engage with challenging political issues, and in tackling misinformation and disinformation, whilst ensuring impartiality and avoiding bias. The Committee will be holding oral evidence sessions with a range of stakeholders, and will also be seeking the views of young people. |