Information between 5th January 2026 - 15th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290 |
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 26 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Ruth Cadbury voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Ruth Cadbury speeches from: Northern Powerhouse Rail
Ruth Cadbury contributed 1 speech (126 words) Wednesday 14th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
|
Ruth Cadbury speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Ruth Cadbury contributed 1 speech (60 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
|
Ruth Cadbury speeches from: Road Safety Strategy
Ruth Cadbury contributed 1 speech (90 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Ruth Cadbury speeches from: High Street Gambling Reform
Ruth Cadbury contributed 1 speech (768 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Ruth Cadbury speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Ruth Cadbury contributed 2 speeches (61 words) Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Shared Ownership Schemes
Asked by: Ruth Cadbury (Labour - Brentford and Isleworth) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he plans to review the adequacy of existing protections for leaseholders of shared ownership leasehold properties who are unable to either sell or re-mortgage their properties. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Ten major mortgage lenders have signed the updated joint statement on cladding, confirming they will consider lending on properties in buildings 11 metres and above, where the building is in a remediation scheme or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it. Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement. The Government does not collect data on the number of shared owners impacted by building safety issues who have difficulty selling or remortgaging their properties.
The leaseholder protections give greater protection from costs to shared ownership leases. Specifically, holders of qualifying leases which were shared ownership leases as of 14 February 2022 have lower maximum contribution caps, proportional to their share of ownership of the property on that date. Government is not currently considering expanding the leaseholder protections further. The Leaseholder Protections balance the rights of leaseholders with those of those freeholders not connected with the developer who were equally innocent in the creation of the emerging defects. |
|
Shared Ownership Schemes
Asked by: Ruth Cadbury (Labour - Brentford and Isleworth) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether the Department has considered a buy-back scheme for shared ownership leaseholders whose homes become unsaleable due to building safety faults. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Ten major mortgage lenders have signed the updated joint statement on cladding, confirming they will consider lending on properties in buildings 11 metres and above, where the building is in a remediation scheme or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it. Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement. The Government does not collect data on the number of shared owners impacted by building safety issues who have difficulty selling or remortgaging their properties.
The leaseholder protections give greater protection from costs to shared ownership leases. Specifically, holders of qualifying leases which were shared ownership leases as of 14 February 2022 have lower maximum contribution caps, proportional to their share of ownership of the property on that date. Government is not currently considering expanding the leaseholder protections further. The Leaseholder Protections balance the rights of leaseholders with those of those freeholders not connected with the developer who were equally innocent in the creation of the emerging defects. |
|
Flats: Insulation
Asked by: Ruth Cadbury (Labour - Brentford and Isleworth) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what estimate he has made of the number of shared ownership leaseholders (a) nationally and (b) in London who are unable to sell or remortgage their homes due to cladding or EWS1-related issues. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Ten major mortgage lenders have signed the updated joint statement on cladding, confirming they will consider lending on properties in buildings 11 metres and above, where the building is in a remediation scheme or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it. Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement. The Government does not collect data on the number of shared owners impacted by building safety issues who have difficulty selling or remortgaging their properties.
The leaseholder protections give greater protection from costs to shared ownership leases. Specifically, holders of qualifying leases which were shared ownership leases as of 14 February 2022 have lower maximum contribution caps, proportional to their share of ownership of the property on that date. Government is not currently considering expanding the leaseholder protections further. The Leaseholder Protections balance the rights of leaseholders with those of those freeholders not connected with the developer who were equally innocent in the creation of the emerging defects. |
|
Flats: Insulation
Asked by: Ruth Cadbury (Labour - Brentford and Isleworth) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of consumer protections on the marketing and selling of shared ownership properties with cladding or remediation based issues. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Ten major mortgage lenders have signed the updated joint statement on cladding, confirming they will consider lending on properties in buildings 11 metres and above, where the building is in a remediation scheme or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it. Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement. The Government does not collect data on the number of shared owners impacted by building safety issues who have difficulty selling or remortgaging their properties.
The leaseholder protections give greater protection from costs to shared ownership leases. Specifically, holders of qualifying leases which were shared ownership leases as of 14 February 2022 have lower maximum contribution caps, proportional to their share of ownership of the property on that date. Government is not currently considering expanding the leaseholder protections further. The Leaseholder Protections balance the rights of leaseholders with those of those freeholders not connected with the developer who were equally innocent in the creation of the emerging defects. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
7 Jan 2026, 12:01 p.m. - House of Commons "are with us in the gallery today. Prime Minister's Questions Ruth Cadbury. >> Question number. >> One, Mr. Speaker. >> Prime Minister. " Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP, The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Leeds South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 12:03 p.m. - House of Commons " Ruth Cadbury. Leaseholders in my constituency and across the country are being fleeced by freeholders and managing " Ruth Cadbury MP (Brentford and Isleworth, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Jan 2026, 10:32 a.m. - House of Commons " Chair of the Select Committee. Ruth Cadbury. Ruth Cadbury. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. >> The government. >> Has given mayoral authorities " Ruth Cadbury MP (Brentford and Isleworth, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Jan 2026, 1:01 p.m. - House of Commons " Ruth Cadbury, chair of the >> Ruth Cadbury, chair of the Select Committee. >> Mr. speaker, this. " Ruth Cadbury MP (Brentford and Isleworth, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Road Safety Strategy
96 speeches (11,034 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) Friend the Member for Brentford and Isleworth (Ruth Cadbury) for her support on behalf of the Transport - Link to Speech |
|
High Street Gambling Reform
48 speeches (13,088 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: Caroline Nokes (Con - Romsey and Southampton North) I shall leave Ruth Cadbury on seven minutes, but there will be a five-minute limit for the remaining - Link to Speech 2: Ian Murray (Lab - Edinburgh South) Friend the Member for Brentford and Isleworth (Ruth Cadbury) has one of the highest concentrations of - Link to Speech 3: Dawn Butler (Lab - Brent East) Friend the Member for Brentford and Isleworth (Ruth Cadbury) talked about protecting public health and - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 21st January 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th February 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 5:30 p.m. Liaison Committee (Commons) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 28th January 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Joined-up journeys: achieving and measuring transport integration At 9:15am: Oral evidence Kate Carpenter - Vice President at Chartered Institution of Highways & Transportation Robert Johnson - Analyst at Centre for Cities Professor Greg Marsden - Professor of Transport Governance at Institute for Transport Studies Damien Jones - Chair at Association of Transport Co-ordinating Officers View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 4 p.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
29 Jan 2026
Road Safety Strategy Transport Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 13 Mar 2026) The Government has published a new Road Safety Strategy setting out the Government’s approach to reducing death and serious injury. The Transport Committee is launching an inquiry to examine its potential effectiveness. |