Information between 14th January 2026 - 24th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 182 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 184 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 127 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 185 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles: Legacy and Reconciliation - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 373 Noes - 106 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 194 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Sammy Wilson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Democratic Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 326 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
India: Armed Conflict
Asked by: Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party - East Antrim) Wednesday 21st January 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what recent discussions she has had with her Indian counterpart on the protection of civilians, including members of the Muslim community. Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) I refer the Hon Member to the answer provided on 25 November 2025 in response to Question 90911. |
|
Peatlands
Asked by: Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party - East Antrim) Friday 23rd January 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of unmanaged vegetation fuel loads on upland peatland and the severity of wildfires. Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Healthy peatlands do not require active vegetation management such as burning or cutting. There is clear scientific evidence that burning is particularly damaging, as it degrades peatland conditions, undermines restoration and increases long-term vulnerability to wildfires. In response, the Government amended the Heather and Grass etc. Burning (England) Regulations 2021 in September last year to extend protections to more peatlands. Alongside these changes the Heather and Grass Management Code 2025 was published to support land managers selecting appropriate management approaches that reduce peatland damage, support restoration and enhance natural resilience to hazards such as wildfire.
In addition, a two-year research project, Wildfire and Peatland: Studies to Support Delivery of the Third National Adaptation Programme, has been commissioned. This work will inform delivery of the Government’s risk‑reduction objectives by identifying effective approaches for maintaining healthy, functioning peatlands and improving the resilience of these important carbon stores under future climate conditions. |
|
Peatlands
Asked by: Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party - East Antrim) Friday 23rd January 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what comparative assessment she has made of wildfire risks under (a) prescribed burning, (b) mechanical cutting and (c) no active vegetation management. Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Healthy peatlands do not require active vegetation management such as burning or cutting. There is clear scientific evidence that burning is particularly damaging, as it degrades peatland conditions, undermines restoration and increases long-term vulnerability to wildfires. In response, the Government amended the Heather and Grass etc. Burning (England) Regulations 2021 in September last year to extend protections to more peatlands. Alongside these changes the Heather and Grass Management Code 2025 was published to support land managers selecting appropriate management approaches that reduce peatland damage, support restoration and enhance natural resilience to hazards such as wildfire.
In addition, a two-year research project, Wildfire and Peatland: Studies to Support Delivery of the Third National Adaptation Programme, has been commissioned. This work will inform delivery of the Government’s risk‑reduction objectives by identifying effective approaches for maintaining healthy, functioning peatlands and improving the resilience of these important carbon stores under future climate conditions. |
|
Gambling and Video Games: Children and Young People
Asked by: Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party - East Antrim) Friday 23rd January 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what comparative assessment her Department has made of (a) loot boxes in video games and (b) gambling products; and what steps she is taking to mitigate potential harms associated with loot box mechanics, particularly for children and young people. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The government is committed to ensuring games are enjoyed safely and responsibly by everyone and that, where they contain loot boxes, there are appropriate protections in place.
Prizes that can be won via loot boxes do not have a monetary value, cannot be cashed-out, and are of value only within the context of the game. They are therefore not legally classified as gambling. However, evidence has shown an association between loot boxes and gambling-related harm.
To improve protections in games containing loot boxes, industry-led guidance was published in 2023 with a 12-month implementation period, after which DCMS commissioned independent academic research into its effectiveness. We will publish the research shortly, alongside our next steps.
|
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 26th January Sammy Wilson signed this EDM on Thursday 5th February 2026 British forces on the front line in Afghanistan 55 signatures (Most recent: 5 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Adam Jogee (Labour - Newcastle-under-Lyme) This House expresses its sincere gratitude to all members of the British armed forces who served on the front line in Afghanistan with courage, bravery and skill; mourns the loss of the 457 personnel who made the ultimate sacrifice and lost their lives in Afghanistan serving freedom, decency and our … |
|
Monday 12th January Sammy Wilson signed this EDM on Monday 26th January 2026 36 signatures (Most recent: 26 Jan 2026) Tabled by: Iqbal Mohamed (Independent - Dewsbury and Batley) That this House condemns the use of Grok AI to generate and disseminate sexually explicit and non-consensual images of women and children on X, including digitally undressing and sexualising images of minors; notes with alarm that such material has included depictions of children as young as 10 and has circulated … |
|
Wednesday 7th January Sammy Wilson signed this EDM on Monday 26th January 2026 Newborn bloodspot screening for spinal muscular atrophy 34 signatures (Most recent: 2 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Sorcha Eastwood (Alliance - Lagan Valley) That this House recognises the life-changing difference early diagnosis and treatment can make for babies with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA); notes that SMA is a rare but serious genetic condition which, if untreated, can cause severe disability or early death; further notes that gene therapies exist which are most effective … |
|
Tuesday 6th January Sammy Wilson signed this EDM on Thursday 15th January 2026 63 signatures (Most recent: 6 Feb 2026) Tabled by: Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party - Strangford) That this House expresses its strong support for the people of Iran, and their courage and resolve in their ongoing struggle against all forms of dictatorships of the past and present and for freedom, human rights, and a democratic republic, where people of Iran have the opportunity to elect their … |
|
Monday 5th January Sammy Wilson signed this EDM on Thursday 15th January 2026 9 signatures (Most recent: 27 Jan 2026) Tabled by: Rupert Lowe (Independent - Great Yarmouth) That this House notes that businesses will see their rateable values recalculated as part of the business rates revaluation; expresses serious concern that the resulting increases in bills for many companies risk placing unsustainable pressure on high streets, town centres and small businesses, particularly the hospitality industry; believes that these … |
|
Monday 24th November Sammy Wilson signed this EDM on Thursday 15th January 2026 Phenylketonuria awareness and access to treatment (No. 2) 26 signatures (Most recent: 30 Jan 2026)Tabled by: Liz Twist (Labour - Blaydon and Consett) That this House recognises the progress made in improving the care of people with phenylketonuria (PKU), a rare inherited metabolic disorder which prevents the body from properly metabolising phenylalanine; welcomes that many patients have benefitted from access to sapropterin, which has improved quality of life for some individuals living with … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
19 Jan 2026, 5:54 p.m. - House of Commons " Sammy Wilson speaker. People in Northern Ireland on a day to day basis, know well how casually the " Rt Hon Sammy Wilson MP (East Antrim, Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Jan 2026, 4:28 p.m. - House of Commons " Sammy Wilson Madam Deputy Speaker. United Kingdom are failing, especially small businesses in retail, hospitality or pubs. And " Rt Hon Sammy Wilson MP (East Antrim, Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Jan 2026, 1:18 p.m. - House of Commons " Sammy Wilson thank you, Madam Speaker. Despite the fact that these plans will not apply to these plans will not apply to Northern Ireland, I do welcome the aspect of the plans which apply to rented accommodation. Maybe the " Rt Hon Sammy Wilson MP (East Antrim, Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Jan 2026, 6:33 p.m. - House of Commons " Sammy Wilson. Veterans will have heard the honeyed words of the Secretary of State at the start of his speech today, when he talked about the " Rt Hon Sammy Wilson MP (East Antrim, Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 21st January 2026 2 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Revised Environmental Improvement Plan At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Richard Benwell - Chief Executive at Wildlife and Countryside Link Livi Elsmore - Senior Campaign Manager at Healthy Air Coalition Ruth Chambers OBE - Senior Fellow at Green Alliance At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Sally Hayns - CEO at CIEEM Martin Lines - CEO at Nature Friendly Farming Network Dianne Mitchell - Chief Environment Adviser at National Farmers Union (NFU) View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 28th January 2026 2 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Office for Environmental Protection Annual Evidence session At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Dame Glenys Stacey DBE - Chair at Office for Environmental Protection Natalie Prosser - CEO at Office for Environmental Protection Dr Cathy Maguire - Head of Assessments at Office for Environmental Protection View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th February 2026 2 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Addressing the risks from Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Liz Parkes MBE - Deputy Director for Climate Change, Chemicals & Markets at Environment Agency Matt Womersley - Environment and Business Manager – Chemicals Regulatory Development at Environment Agency Richard Daniels - Divisional Director of Chemicals Regulation Division at Health and Safety Executive At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Emma Hardy MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Minister for Water and Flooding) at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Marc Casale - Deputy Director, Chemicals & International at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026 2 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
20 Jan 2026
Air Pollution in England Environmental Audit Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Air pollution is a serious threat to both public health and the natural environment. It has been linked to heart disease, strokes, cancer, asthma and impacts on lung development in children. Tens of thousands of lives are being shortened in the UK by air pollution, according to the Chair of the Environment Agency. Through the inquiry, MPs will also consider whether local authorities in England have the resources they need to monitor air quality and enforce existing rules. MPs may consider examples of best practice abroad, and what lessons these might have for policy in England. The new inquiry is the result of the Committee’s ‘The Environment in Focus’ exercise, which saw MPs hear pitches for their next inquiry from a range of academic experts and advocates. The winning pitch was given by Jemima Hartshorn, founder of campaign group Mums for Lungs and Dr Nat Easton, who researches air quality at the University of Southampton. Read the call for evidence for more information about this inquiry, and to find out how to submit written evidence through the Committee's online evidence submission portal. |