Earl of Caithness Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Earl of Caithness

Information between 18th March 2025 - 17th April 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 122 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 185
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 185
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 156
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 108 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 127
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 165
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 172
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 103 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 126
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 187 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 151
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 187 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 162
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 127 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 135
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 141
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 179
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 180 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 165
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Earl of Caithness voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 177


Speeches
Earl of Caithness speeches from: Food, Diet and Obesity Committee Report
Earl of Caithness contributed 1 speech (882 words)
Friday 28th March 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Pets: Insecticides
Asked by: Earl of Caithness (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)
Thursday 27th March 2025

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to restricting tick and flea treatments for pets containing fipronil or imidacloprid to prescription only, in the light of evidence of their human and environmental toxicity and their detrimental effects on aquatic life.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

Parasiticides, such as those containing fipronil and imidacloprid, play an essential role in protecting both animal and human health against fleas and ticks and their associated vector-borne diseases, which can lead to parasitic disease in pets and present zoonotic risks to humans, as well as causing distress and discomfort. The concerns regarding the potential contribution of flea and tick treatments to the levels of imidacloprid currently being detected in UK surface waters are recognised. The Veterinary Medicine Directorate (VMD) is currently gathering evidence on this issue and has initiated the formation of a cross-governmental Pharmaceuticals in the Environment (PiE) Group.

The PiE Group has set out a roadmap of activities to address levels of fipronil and imidacloprid in UK waterways. The immediate priority is to collaborate with key stakeholders to enhance and promote consistent messaging to users on the appropriate use of topical parasiticides for cats and dogs, aiming to reduce potential environmental impacts. Beyond this, actions will focus on developing our evidence base through research and monitoring. The group will use this evidence to improve understanding of the issue and inform future policy activities in the longer term.

At this stage, there are no plans to restrict flea and tick treatments to prescription only. Any future regulatory decisions will be based on robust scientific evidence to ensure both environmental protection and continued access to essential veterinary medicines.

Bracken: Weedkillers
Asked by: Earl of Caithness (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)
Tuesday 1st April 2025

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to resume the chemical control of bracken to protect human health, biodiversity and the historic environment.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Government recognises the challenge that bracken presents to land managers, particularly in upland regions. Mechanical control and chemical control using glyphosate can be useful tools in controlling bracken, though the government recognises their limitations. It is for individual land managers to decide how to control bracken within safe and legal means.

The Government encourages industry and other external partners to develop new tools that will help to address the challenge of managing bracken. Any herbicides not currently allowed for bracken control would require authorisation for that purpose by the Health and Safety Executive.




Earl of Caithness - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Monday 19th May 2025 noon
Procedure and Privileges Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar