Information between 13th July 2025 - 11th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 3rd September 2025 Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Football Governance Act 2025 View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025 Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Progress made by law enforcement agencies in pursuing perpetrators of online hate and racism View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 148 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 148 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 191 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 137 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 170 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 131 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 138 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 136 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 116 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 17 Noes - 120 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 127 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 189 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Merck Research Site
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 1 speech (76 words) Thursday 11th September 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Football Governance Act 2025: Implementation
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 2 speeches (124 words) Wednesday 3rd September 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Tourism Levy
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 2 speeches (94 words) Monday 14th July 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Religious Buildings: Conservation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 17th September 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to meet representatives from UK Cluniac sites to discuss the progression of the European Federation of Cluniac Sites UNESCO World Heritage bid, and the inclusion of those sites on a UK tentative list. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) DCMS and Historic England, as our statutory advisers on heritage, regularly discuss sites and places we know to be interested in UNESCO World Heritage status, and have previously met and written to representatives from UK Cluniac sites. With the large number of UK World Heritage Sites and our commitment to supporting UNESCO’s ambition for a more globally balanced and representative World Heritage List, the UK Government does not currently have plans to consider additional sites for nomination to UNESCO, beyond those already included on the UK’s Tentative List. No recent formal assessments have been made by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK’s Tentative List. Applications to the 2022/23 Tentative List Review were assessed by an independent expert panel and the Government response was published in July 2023. |
|
Religious Buildings: Conservation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 17th September 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what conclusions were drawn from any recent assessments by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK's UNESCO tentative list, and whether they will publish those assessments. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) DCMS and Historic England, as our statutory advisers on heritage, regularly discuss sites and places we know to be interested in UNESCO World Heritage status, and have previously met and written to representatives from UK Cluniac sites. With the large number of UK World Heritage Sites and our commitment to supporting UNESCO’s ambition for a more globally balanced and representative World Heritage List, the UK Government does not currently have plans to consider additional sites for nomination to UNESCO, beyond those already included on the UK’s Tentative List. No recent formal assessments have been made by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK’s Tentative List. Applications to the 2022/23 Tentative List Review were assessed by an independent expert panel and the Government response was published in July 2023. |
|
Religious Buildings: Conservation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 17th September 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will be participating in and engaging with the bid by the European Federation of Cluniac Sites for UNESCO World Heritage status of its sites, and whether they will ensure that relevant agencies are involved in the process. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) DCMS and Historic England, as our statutory advisers on heritage, regularly discuss sites and places we know to be interested in UNESCO World Heritage status, and have previously met and written to representatives from UK Cluniac sites. With the large number of UK World Heritage Sites and our commitment to supporting UNESCO’s ambition for a more globally balanced and representative World Heritage List, the UK Government does not currently have plans to consider additional sites for nomination to UNESCO, beyond those already included on the UK’s Tentative List. No recent formal assessments have been made by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK’s Tentative List. Applications to the 2022/23 Tentative List Review were assessed by an independent expert panel and the Government response was published in July 2023. |
|
Religious Buildings: Conservation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 17th September 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what meetings and discussions they have had with Historic England regarding the bid by the European Federation of Cluniac Sites for UNESCO World Heritage Status of their network of European sites. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) DCMS and Historic England, as our statutory advisers on heritage, regularly discuss sites and places we know to be interested in UNESCO World Heritage status, and have previously met and written to representatives from UK Cluniac sites. With the large number of UK World Heritage Sites and our commitment to supporting UNESCO’s ambition for a more globally balanced and representative World Heritage List, the UK Government does not currently have plans to consider additional sites for nomination to UNESCO, beyond those already included on the UK’s Tentative List. No recent formal assessments have been made by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK’s Tentative List. Applications to the 2022/23 Tentative List Review were assessed by an independent expert panel and the Government response was published in July 2023. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
15 Jul 2025, 9:28 p.m. - House of Lords "several noble Lords who have been involved throughout the passage of this bill. In particular, would like to thank my noble friends, Lord Bassam of Brighton, who was not able " Baroness Twycross, The Minister of State, Department for Culture, Media and Sport (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Football Governance Bill [HL]
31 speeches (9,209 words) Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: Baroness Twycross (Lab - Life peer) In particular, I thank my noble friend Lord Bassam of Brighton, who was not able to be here today, and - Link to Speech |