Information between 12th November 2025 - 12th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 132 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Local Elections
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 1 speech (74 words) Monday 8th December 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 1 speech (964 words) 2nd readingLorsd Hansard Monday 8th December 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Independent Football Regulator
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 1 speech (135 words) Tuesday 18th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 1 speech (60 words) Committee stage Friday 14th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Heathrow Airport: Railways
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will ensure that access to Heathrow Airport from Surrey, Sussex and Hampshire are considered in any assessment of new rail links to the proposed third runway at Heathrow Airport. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Government recognises the vital role that surface access will play as part of any future expansion of Heathrow Airport. As part of the review of the Airports National Policy Statement (ANPS), launched on 22 October 2025, we will consider the transport infrastructure required to support a third runway, including rail connectivity and mode share targets. This will include considering the impacts for travellers from different regions.
The Government has been clear that expansion must be affordable and delivered in the best interest of passengers. Scheme costs should be minimised and financed through private funding, including any surface transport costs.
While it would not be appropriate to pre-empt the outcome of the ANPS review at this stage, it will be the responsibility of any expansion promoter to set out a surface access strategy demonstrating how they will meet the requirements set out in the ANPS. |
|
Heathrow Airport: Railways
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will carry out an economic assessment, including a regional analysis, when evaluating rail access to Heathrow Airport as part of expansion proposals. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Government recognises the vital role that surface access will play as part of any future expansion of Heathrow Airport. As part of the review of the Airports National Policy Statement (ANPS), launched on 22 October 2025, we will consider the transport infrastructure required to support a third runway, including rail connectivity and mode share targets. This will include considering the impacts for travellers from different regions.
The Government has been clear that expansion must be affordable and delivered in the best interest of passengers. Scheme costs should be minimised and financed through private funding, including any surface transport costs.
While it would not be appropriate to pre-empt the outcome of the ANPS review at this stage, it will be the responsibility of any expansion promoter to set out a surface access strategy demonstrating how they will meet the requirements set out in the ANPS. |
|
Heathrow Airport: Railways
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will consider surface rail transportation benefits of a southern link to Heathrow when evaluating proposals for the expansion of Heathrow Airport. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Government recognises the vital role that surface access will play as part of any future expansion of Heathrow Airport. As part of the review of the Airports National Policy Statement (ANPS), launched on 22 October 2025, we will consider the transport infrastructure required to support a third runway, including rail connectivity and mode share targets. This will include considering the impacts for travellers from different regions.
The Government has been clear that expansion must be affordable and delivered in the best interest of passengers. Scheme costs should be minimised and financed through private funding, including any surface transport costs.
While it would not be appropriate to pre-empt the outcome of the ANPS review at this stage, it will be the responsibility of any expansion promoter to set out a surface access strategy demonstrating how they will meet the requirements set out in the ANPS. |
|
Tourism: Taxation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 9th December 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government who will be responsible for collecting the new ‘tourist tax’ on overnight stays in England and how revenue through the tax will be distributed. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) The power is for Mayors, and potentially other local leaders, to introduce a visitor levy to raise revenue to drive growth and invest in their areas. The precise design and scope of the power is still under development. The Government has published a consultation which will run until 18 February 2026, to ensure that the public, businesses, and local government can shape the design of the power, including the administration process. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill
39 speeches (17,015 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 2nd December 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Mentions: 1: Lord Whitehead (Lab - Life peer) Indeed, my thanks go also to the marvellous supporters at my introduction—my noble friends Lord Bassam of Brighton - Link to Speech |
|
Introduction: Lord Whitehead
1 speech (1 words) Thursday 20th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: None in the City of Southampton, was introduced and made the solemn affirmation, supported by Lord Bassam of Brighton - Link to Speech |