Information between 29th October 2025 - 18th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 27th November 2025 Lord Rooker (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Departments involved in considering the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s code of practice on implementing the Supreme Court judgment on the meaning of “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 142 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 118 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 128 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 169 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 151 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 125 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 102 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Rooker speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Lord Rooker contributed 1 speech (126 words) Committee stage Friday 14th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Development Aid: Iodine
Asked by: Lord Rooker (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 5th November 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government how much they spend on iodine fortification programmes via international aid. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) does not directly fund traditional iodine fortification programmes but currently supports a range of nutritionally impactful interventions, including home fortification and supplementation containing iodine. Through our support to initiatives like the Child Nutrition Fund, a platform that aims to transform how nutrition is financed and delivered, the fund intends to contribute to reaching 320 million children and women annually with essential nutrition services by 2030. FCDO is also a long-standing and significant funder of CGIAR, which drives progress on biofortified crops. With UK support, 300 million people were estimated as consuming CGIAR-supported biofortified foods by 2024. |
|
Iodine: Women
Asked by: Lord Rooker (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 30th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what action they have taken since the publication of National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2019 to 2023: report on 11 June, in particular in regard to the finding that females of reproductive age in the UK have less than the World Health Organization thresholds for adequate iodine concentration. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The latest National Diet and Nutrition Survey showed that iodine levels in urine in women of reproductive age, 16 to 49 years old, were below the World Health Organisation threshold for adequacy, indicating insufficient iodine intake. Similar findings were seen in men aged 19 to 64 years old and girls aged 11 to 18 years old. The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) maintains a watching brief on emerging evidence on iodine and health, including the iodine status of women of reproductive age in the United Kingdom. The SACN considered the topic of iodine at its horizon scans in 2022 and 2024 and agreed to add this topic to its work programme, with work on iodine due to start in 2026. Government advice remains that individuals should be able to obtain all the iodine they need from a balanced diet, as depicted in The Eatwell Guide. |
|
Conflict Resolution: Women
Asked by: Lord Rooker (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question To ask His Majesty's Government whether Equality and Human Rights Commission's guidance on single-sex spaces following the Supreme Court decision has been sent to the devolved administrations in draft. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The EHRC has submitted its Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations to the Government. The Code addresses a broad range of issues for service providers, beyond those relating to single sex spaces. The Government is considering the draft updated Code and, if the decision is taken to approve it, the Code will be laid before Parliament.
Under Section 14 of the Equality Act 2006, the Secretary of State is required to consult with Scottish and Welsh Ministers at relevant stages in this process. Ministers are following this process. |
|
Conflict Resolution: Women
Asked by: Lord Rooker (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 12th November 2025 Question To ask His Majesty's Government whether Equality and Human Rights Commission's guidance on single-sex spaces following the Supreme Court decision requires either a general impact statement or a regulatory impact statement; and who makes the decision. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) I refer the noble Lord to my contribution in Hansard, Volume 849, column 1924: debated on Wednesday 5 November 2025: Equality and Human Rights Commission: Draft Updated Code of Practice:
"…the EHRC has not been asked to carry out a full regulatory impact assessment, but rather to provide a minimum proportionate cost assessment to evidence exclusion from a full regulatory impact assessment and enable us to take an informed decision. Understanding costs and impacts is not new; it would have been a consideration in the 2011 code.” |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
5 Nov 2025, 5:24 p.m. - House of Lords "supported me over a period of months the Safe coalition. I'm also grateful to the noble Lord Rooker, " Amendment:55 Lord Dubs (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Declarations of interest - Declaration of interests - November 2025 Environment and Climate Change Committee Found: Lord Lennie No relevant interests declared Lord Mancroft No relevant interests declared Lord Rooker |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Climate Change Committee, and Climate Change Committee Drought Preparedness - Environment and Climate Change Committee Found: Duncan of Springbank; Lord Jay of Ewelme; Lord Krebs; Lord Layard; Lord Lennie; Lord Mancroft; Lord Rooker |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Met Office, British Geological Survey, and UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH) Drought Preparedness - Environment and Climate Change Committee Found: Duncan of Springbank; Lord Jay of Ewelme; Lord Krebs; Lord Layard; Lord Lennie; Lord Mancroft; Lord Rooker |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Environment and Climate Change Committee Found: Springbank; Lord Jay of Ewelme; Lord Krebs; The Earl of Leicester; Lord Lennie; Lord Mancroft; Lord Rooker |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Drought Preparedness At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Jason Lowe OBE - Head of Climate Services at Met Office Professor Alan MacDonald - Head of Groundwater at British Geological Survey Jamie Hannaford - Principal Hydrologist at UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH) At 11:00am: Oral evidence The Baroness Brown of Cambridge DBE FREng FRS - Chair of the Adaptation Committee at Climate Change Committee Richard Millar - Head of Adaptation at Climate Change Committee View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Drought Preparedness At 10:00am: Oral evidence Kathryn Brown - Director of Climate Change and Evidence at The Wildlife Trusts Callum Ellis - Head of Climate Resilience at Marsh Yetunde Abdul - Director of Industry Transformation at UK Green Building Council View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 26th November 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Drought Preparedness At 10:00am: Oral evidence Rob Lawson - Chair of Water Resources Technical Panel at Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management Professor Jim Hall - Professor of Climate and Environmental Risks at University of Oxford Dr Chris Counsell - Technical Director at HR Wallingford View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Climate Change Committee At 10:00am: Oral evidence Nigel Topping - Chair at Climate Change Committee View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Drought Preparedness At 10:00am: Oral evidence Sarah McMath - CEO at MOSL Meyrick Gough - Managing Director at Water Resources South East View calendar - Add to calendar |