Found: This was pointed out by Lord Steyn in the McCann case in 2003 with respect to ASBOs.

Found: As Lord Steyn observed in the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords in 2004: ‘In our Parliamentary

Found: retrospectively: R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539, 591 per Lord Steyn

Found: For he endorsed the very claims made by Lord Steyn and Lady Hale 20 AV Dicey, Introduction to the Study

Found: According to Lord Steyn in R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Found: Rule of Law’ (Policy Exchange, 2024), 11-17. 33 R v DPP ex parte Kebilene (1999) 28 EHRR CD1, 23 (Lord Steyn

Found: In re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2004] UKHL 47 at paragraph 17 Lord Steyn

Found: including those who both prosecute and defend RASSO2 cases, and some who only accept defence or 1 Lord Steyn

Found: were also excluded from PIDA 2 House of Lords decision in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd Lord Steyn

Found: 49 Pla and Puncernau v Andorra (2006) 42 EHRR 25. 50 Malik v BCCI [1997] UKHL 23. 51 Malik, per Lord Steyn

Found: 2019] I.C.R. 28 92 See Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] ICR 606 per Lord Steyn

Found: validity of the Hunting Act 2004, which was passed using the Parliament Act 1949.33 In his judgm ent, Lord Steyn

Found: As described by Lord Steyn in Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Comm erce International S.A [

Found: ethical and moral issues and the risks and potential consequences of a change in the law.” 8 36 Lord Steyn

Found: (see R (on the application of S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39 at 50 per Lord Steyn

Found: court “on application” by law enforcement bodies. 9 [2002] UKHL 2, [2003] 1 AC 1099 at [8] (Lord Steyn

Found: Lord Steyn, in the Judicial House of Lords said in the Pretty case, subsequently approved in the Conway

Found: Lord Steyn, in the Judicial House of Lords said in the Pretty case, subsequently approved in the Conway

Found: validity of the Hunting Act 2004, which was passed using the Parliament Act 1949.33 In his judgm ent, Lord Steyn

Found: their operational effectiveness. 55 R v Benjafield [2002] UKHL 2, [2003] 1 AC 109 9 at [8] (Lord Steyn

Found: Lord Steyn acknowledged its constitutional significance (para. 7) and Lord Hope spoke of the ‘right

Found: whereby those seeking asylum have their claims dete rmined in Rwanda ’ [Auth/CB/102/4773 ]. 41 Lord Steyn

Found: whereby those seeking asylum have their claims determined in Rwanda’ [Auth/CB/102/4773]. 41 Lord Steyn

Found: UKSC 51, [2013] 1 AC 294 at [25]). 55 R v Benjafield [2002] UKHL 2, [2003] 1 AC 1099 at [8] (Lord Steyn

Found: Waya [2012] UKSC 51, [2013] 1 AC 294 at [2], the Supreme Court noted that the observations of Lord Steyn

Found: any other similarly graphic surprise metaphor.’ 112 Sections 62(4) and (6) of the Act. 113 Per Lord Steyn

Found: of incompatibility under section 4 of the 1998 Act must always be the exceptional course (per Lord Steyn

Found: the parties whether Tullett marked an unacceptable departure from a passage in the decision of Lord Steyn

Found: As to its general theme, in an oft-cited passage in Anyanwu Lord Steyn said at [24]: “Discrimination

Found: of the case: Man O’War Station Ltd v Auckland City Council (No.1) [2002] UKPC 28 at [11] (per Lord Steyn

Found: Lord Steyn said this (at Mannai, p772H): “The question is not whether 12 January can mean 13 January

Found: Lord Steyn described the balancing exercise to be conducted in a case involving these conflicting rights

Found: is potentially relevant when applying the similar test for costs, including the analysis by Lord Steyn

Found: It suffices to cite Lord Steyn in Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997]

Found: of Birk enhead, delivering the joint opinion of the appellate committee (which also comprised Lord Steyn

Found: They may be familiar, but the words of Lord Steyn in Anyanwu v South Bank Students Union [2001] UKHL

Found: (Westminster City Council) v National Asylum Support Service [2002] 1 WLR 2956, HL, §§2 -5 per Lord Steyn

Found: the case law on conforming interpretations are interchangeable - see for example the speech of Lord Steyn

Found: In Anyanwu v South Bank Stude nt Union [2001] ICR 391, [2001] UKHL 14 Lord Steyn said at paragraph

Found: is not an exercise in semantics or linguistics (See Ghaidan per Lord Nicholls at 31 and 35; Lord Steyn

Found: fifth of Briggs J’s principles in Benchdollar ; and in other leaner formulations - such as that of Lord Steyn

Found: On t he contrary, as Lord Steyn observed in McGuckian [1997] 1 WLR 991, 1001, tax avoidance is the

Found: Thus, in R (Westminster City Council) v National Asylum Support Service Lord Steyn said at [6] of his

Found: real relevance: see Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [2000] 1 AC 501 at pp.519H -520A per Lord Steyn

Found: employe e (rather than what the employer intended) , which is to be assessed objectively (per Lord Steyn

Found: South Bank Student Union ( Commission of Racial Equality intervening) [2001] ICR 391, para 24, Lord Steyn

Found: He relies upon the dicta of Lord Steyn in Anyanwu v South Bank Student Union [2001] UKHL 14 [ 24]:

Found: it seems to me that the argument is de prived of much force by this passage in the opinion of Lord Steyn

Found: in which deregistration can occur on the basis of Ablessio , and the consequences where a 6 Lord Steyn

Found: In Lawal v Northern Spirit L td [2003] UKHL 35; [2003] ICR 856 at [14], Lord Steyn observed , commen

Found: –23 (contracts), Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749 per Lord Steyn

Found: only: 119 “It seems to me that there is an area, admittedly ill -defined but left open by Lord Steyn

Found: Lord Steyn acknowledged its constitutional significance (para. 7) and Lord Hope spoke of the ‘right

Found: (see R (on the application of S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39 at 50 per Lord Steyn

Found: and victims of child sexual abuse 10 R v Benjafield [2002] UKHL 2, [2003] 1 AC at para 8, per Lord Steyn

Found: To much the same effect, Lord Steyn said, at p 591, that ‘ Unless there is the clearest provision

Found: limited to the context of the legislation and the mischief to which its provisions are aimed: see Lord Steyn