Information between 8th September 2025 - 18th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 300 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 297 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 364 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 87 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 300 |
|
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 179 |
|
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 116 Noes - 333 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 160 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 96 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 325 Noes - 171 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 404 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 158 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 402 Noes - 97 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 398 Noes - 93 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 327 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 333 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 339 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 324 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Jas Athwal voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 316 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Jas Athwal speeches from: Occupied Palestinian Territories: Humanitarian Access
Jas Athwal contributed 3 speeches (349 words) Wednesday 10th September 2025 - Westminster Hall Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
|
Jas Athwal speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Jas Athwal contributed 2 speeches (104 words) Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Migraines: Sick Leave
Asked by: Jas Athwal (Labour - Ilford South) Monday 29th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the potential impact of migraines on (a) the economy and (b) levels of (i) presenteeism and (ii)absenteeism. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Joint DWP and DHSC Work and Health Directorate was set up in 2015 in recognition of the significant link between work and health and to improve employment opportunities for disabled people and people with health conditions, including people with migraines. As part of the mission-led Government, regular cross-governmental collaboration takes place on work and health. The Government recognises that long-term sickness continues to be the most common reason for economic inactivity among the working age population. In 2024, there were 3.1 million days lost through sickness absence where the reason given was ‘headaches or migraines’. As part of the Get Britain Working Plan, more disabled people and those with health conditions will be supported to enter and stay in work, by devolving more power to local areas so they can shape a joined-up work, health, and skills offer that suits the needs of the people they serve. |
|
First Time Buyers: Greater London
Asked by: Jas Athwal (Labour - Ilford South) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps she is taking to help reduce barriers to home ownership in London for first-time buyers. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The most sustainable long-term method to improve housing affordability and help people into homeownership is to increase the supply of housing. The government is committed to building 1.5 million homes this parliament (compared to the 1 million homes delivered the last parliament). In December, we announced major changes to the National Planning Policy Framework, including the restoration of mandatory housing targets and changes to allow development on ‘grey belt’. These reforms were forecast by the OBR to deliver 170,000 additional homes and add £6.8bn to the economy by 2029/30.
We have worked with the FCA and the Bank of England, who have clarified and increased the flexibility of their mortgage regulations. This is helping more customers – especially first-time buyers – to borrow what they need to buy the homes they want, while retaining protections so that lending remains affordable and responsible. |
|
First Time Buyers
Asked by: Jas Athwal (Labour - Ilford South) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps she is taking to help first-time buyers in (a) London and (b) general. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The most sustainable long-term method to improve housing affordability and help people into homeownership is to increase the supply of housing. The government is committed to building 1.5 million homes this parliament (compared to the 1 million homes delivered the last parliament). In December, we announced major changes to the National Planning Policy Framework, including the restoration of mandatory housing targets and changes to allow development on ‘grey belt’. These reforms were forecast by the OBR to deliver 170,000 additional homes and add £6.8bn to the economy by 2029/30.
We have worked with the FCA and the Bank of England, who have clarified and increased the flexibility of their mortgage regulations. This is helping more customers – especially first-time buyers – to borrow what they need to buy the homes they want, while retaining protections so that lending remains affordable and responsible. |
|
First Time Buyers: Greater London
Asked by: Jas Athwal (Labour - Ilford South) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to reform (a) Lifetime ISAs and (b) Stamp Duty Land Tax to support first time buyers in London. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) SDLT continues to be an important source of government revenue, raising around £12 billion each year to help pay for the essential services the government provides. Any changes to SDLT would therefore have to be carefully considered given the potential effect on public finances.
The Government is committed to helping first-time buyers own their own home. The Lifetime ISA remains focused on supporting people to achieve the aspiration of home ownership, or to build up savings for later life.
The Government keeps all taxes under review as part of the usual tax policy making process. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Tuesday 16th September Jas Athwal signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 13th October 2025 Police front counters in London 6 signatures (Most recent: 13 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Margaret Mullane (Labour - Dagenham and Rainham) That this House recognises the invaluable provision of police front counters in London, whether they are located in purpose-built police stations or in multi-use shared spaces such as community centres, libraries, and supermarkets; acknowledges that police accessibility and the provision to report crime face-to-face is a vital service which ensures … |
|
Monday 1st September Jas Athwal signed this EDM on Monday 13th October 2025 Statutory right for leaseholders to access information 11 signatures (Most recent: 17 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Margaret Mullane (Labour - Dagenham and Rainham) That this House recognises the experience of leaseholders whose homes are destroyed by fire, such as those who held leases in the Spectrum Building in Dagenham which suffered this fate on 26 August 2024; notes that there is currently no legal requirement for full disclosure of information passed between the … |