Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Oral Answers to Questions

John Hayes Excerpts
Tuesday 3rd February 2026

(1 day, 15 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

First off, I thank the hon. Gentleman for mentioning victims. For too long in this place, we have tended to focus either on the prosecution side or on defendants, but it is important that we put victims at the centre. That is why we are coming forward with more magistrates. We need that 90% of cases dealt with more swiftly, of course, but court reform is what gets us the entire package. I hope that the hon. Gentleman will be able to support our court reforms over the coming months.

John Hayes Portrait Sir John Hayes (South Holland and The Deepings) (Con)
- Hansard - -

3. What assessment he has made of the potential impact of his proposed changes to jury trials on the criminal justice system.

Steve Darling Portrait Steve Darling (Torbay) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

13. What assessment he has made of the potential impact of his proposed reforms to jury trials on the court backlog.

David Lammy Portrait The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (Mr David Lammy)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I have said, our focus is on victims who are being left to wait three, four or five years for their day in court. That is why I will bring forward bold change to fix the rotting Courts Service that we inherited, deliver record investment in our courts so that they can sit for more days than ever before, introduce modernisation to deal with the inefficiencies that we inherited, and reform the system so that we can triage which trials get a jury and stop criminals gaming the system.

John Hayes Portrait Sir John Hayes
- Hansard - -

As you know, Mr Speaker, the age-old jury system connects the public to the exercise of law, and is therefore at the heart of popular consent for criminal justice. In abandoning this link, are the Government careless of the accountability that it brings, or are they driven wholly by thoughtless expediency? Are Ministers careless or thoughtless?

David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are not abandoning the jury system, but as Sir Brian Leveson said in his Sunday Times article this weekend, the threshold needs to be rebalanced. I am not sure if the right hon. Gentleman was in Parliament in 1988, but I am sure that he did not object when Margaret Thatcher rebalanced the threshold and moved criminal damage and driving a vehicle without authority to the magistrates courts.