Information between 9th September 2025 - 19th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Child Poverty Strategy (Removal of Two Child Limit) - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 79 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 297 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 364 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 87 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 300 |
|
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 179 |
|
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context John Whittingdale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 116 Noes - 333 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
John Whittingdale speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Whittingdale contributed 1 speech (57 words) Monday 13th October 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
John Whittingdale speeches from: Ambassador to the United States
John Whittingdale contributed 5 speeches (1,039 words) Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
|
John Whittingdale speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Whittingdale contributed 1 speech (49 words) Monday 15th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
|
John Whittingdale speeches from: Official Secrets Act
John Whittingdale contributed 1 speech (94 words) Monday 15th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
John Whittingdale speeches from: Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
John Whittingdale contributed 11 speeches (2,263 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Defence |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Artificial Intelligence and Copyright
Asked by: John Whittingdale (Conservative - Maldon) Wednesday 17th September 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, in what way he plans to appoint the Chairs of the technical sub-groups on (a) AI and (b) copyright; and what criteria will be used to ensure their impartiality. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) We have committed to establishing technical working groups to inform our approach to copyright and AI. They will be designed to bring together a range of experts and stakeholders. The initial groups are being jointly chaired by SoS DSIT and SoS DCMS. Details on the subsequent meetings will be set out in due course. |
|
Artificial Intelligence and Copyright
Asked by: John Whittingdale (Conservative - Maldon) Wednesday 17th September 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, if he will publish the (a) membership, (b) minutes and (c) Terms of Reference of the (i) working groups on AI and copyright and (ii) technical sub-groups. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) We have committed to establishing technical working groups to inform our approach to copyright and AI. They will be designed to bring together a range of experts and stakeholders. A full list of attendees and Terms of Reference will be published in due course. |
|
Local Government: Essex
Asked by: John Whittingdale (Conservative - Maldon) Monday 13th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department is taking to reorganise local government in Essex. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Local Government Reorganisation creates a huge opportunity for efficiency and improve public services.
|
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: Fraud
Asked by: John Whittingdale (Conservative - Maldon) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps her Department has taken through the (a) Financial Conduct Authority and (b) Payment Systems Regulator to establish the reasons for which banks have not engaged directly with investors in resolving authorised push payment reimbursement claims relating to investments made (i) before and (ii) after 7 October 2024; and what (A) findings, (B) correspondence and (C) further steps have resulted from this work. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) Treasury Ministers have meetings with a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the process of policy development and delivery. Details of ministerial meetings with external organisations on departmental business are published on a quarterly basis and are available at the link below.
All payment services providers, including banks, are required to comply with the Payment Systems Regulator’s authorised push payment (APP) scam reimbursement regime, which came into force on 7 October 2024. This requires firms to reimburse victims for qualifying APP scams which took place from 7 October 2024 and over the Faster Payments System up to the value of £85,000. For APP scams which took place before this, these may be eligible for reimbursement under the Contingent Reimbursement Model Code, which applied from May 2019 and was signed by the UK’s largest banks and building societies.
The 79th group are currently subject to an ongoing investigation by The City of London Police. As such the Government is unable to comment on the specifics of the case. The FCA and PSR have recently written to financial services firms setting out their expectation that firms should determine whether any claims, or parts of claims, are a qualifying APP scam, on an individual basis.
|
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: Fraud
Asked by: John Whittingdale (Conservative - Maldon) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what representations her Department has received from sending banks under the authorised push payment reimbursement arrangements in relation to (a) claims and (b) complaints by 79th Group investors; and what guidance UK Finance has provided to those banks on handling such claims. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) Treasury Ministers have meetings with a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the process of policy development and delivery. Details of ministerial meetings with external organisations on departmental business are published on a quarterly basis and are available at the link below.
All payment services providers, including banks, are required to comply with the Payment Systems Regulator’s authorised push payment (APP) scam reimbursement regime, which came into force on 7 October 2024. This requires firms to reimburse victims for qualifying APP scams which took place from 7 October 2024 and over the Faster Payments System up to the value of £85,000. For APP scams which took place before this, these may be eligible for reimbursement under the Contingent Reimbursement Model Code, which applied from May 2019 and was signed by the UK’s largest banks and building societies.
The 79th group are currently subject to an ongoing investigation by The City of London Police. As such the Government is unable to comment on the specifics of the case. The FCA and PSR have recently written to financial services firms setting out their expectation that firms should determine whether any claims, or parts of claims, are a qualifying APP scam, on an individual basis.
|
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: Fraud
Asked by: John Whittingdale (Conservative - Maldon) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what representations her Department has received from receiving banks under the authorised push payment reimbursement arrangements in relation to (a) claims and (b) complaints by 79th Group investors; and what guidance UK Finance has provided to those banks on handling such claims. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) Treasury Ministers have meetings with a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the process of policy development and delivery. Details of ministerial meetings with external organisations on departmental business are published on a quarterly basis and are available at the link below.
All payment services providers, including banks, are required to comply with the Payment Systems Regulator’s authorised push payment (APP) scam reimbursement regime, which came into force on 7 October 2024. This requires firms to reimburse victims for qualifying APP scams which took place from 7 October 2024 and over the Faster Payments System up to the value of £85,000. For APP scams which took place before this, these may be eligible for reimbursement under the Contingent Reimbursement Model Code, which applied from May 2019 and was signed by the UK’s largest banks and building societies.
The 79th group are currently subject to an ongoing investigation by The City of London Police. As such the Government is unable to comment on the specifics of the case. The FCA and PSR have recently written to financial services firms setting out their expectation that firms should determine whether any claims, or parts of claims, are a qualifying APP scam, on an individual basis.
|
|
Financial Ombudsman Service
Asked by: John Whittingdale (Conservative - Maldon) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent discussions her Department has had with UK Finance on proposed changes to the (a) role and (b) remit of the Financial Ombudsman Service; and what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of those proposed changes on protections for (i) people in the 79th Group and (b) other vulnerable investors. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) Treasury Ministers meet with a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the regular business of government. Details of ministerial meetings with external organisations on departmental business are published on a quarterly basis and are available at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/hmt-ministers-meetings-hospitality-gifts-and-overseas-travel
The Government engaged a wide range of stakeholders as part of its review of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), which was conducted between March and July 2025. The Government recently consulted on proposed reforms following the conclusion of the review, and the consultation closed on 8 October 2025. The Government is now reviewing responses, and will set out its proposed next steps in due course. The review’s findings and the consultation on proposed reforms can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/fs-sector-strategy-review-of-the-financial-ombudsman-service.
The Government’s proposed reforms will not undermine the important role of the FOS in providing consumers with a cost-free route to quickly and easily resolve disputes with financial services firms. The review concluded that the FOS’s role providing an impartial dispute resolution service within the financial services regulatory framework should be preserved, and that the fair and reasonable test remains appropriate for its position as an informal alternative to the courts.
The Government is proposing that the fair and reasonable test should be retained and adapted to align with the overall regulatory approach for financial services, so that where conduct complained of is in scope of FCA rules, a firm will be considered to have acted fairly and reasonably.
These reforms will improve the regulatory coherence between the FOS and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), to deliver a more consistent and predictable regulatory environment, which the Government believes will benefit both consumers and industry..
The 79th Group is subject to an ongoing investigation by The City of London Police. As such the Government is unable to comment on the specifics of the case. However, the FCA and PSR have recently written to financial services firms setting out their expectation that firms should determine whether any claims, or parts of claims, are a qualifying APP scam, on an individual basis.
|
|
Financial Ombudsman Service
Asked by: John Whittingdale (Conservative - Maldon) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions she has had with UK Finance on reforming of the role of the Financial Ombudsman Service. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) Treasury Ministers meet with a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the regular business of government. Details of ministerial meetings with external organisations on departmental business are published on a quarterly basis and are available at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/hmt-ministers-meetings-hospitality-gifts-and-overseas-travel
The Government engaged a wide range of stakeholders as part of its review of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), which was conducted between March and July 2025. The Government recently consulted on proposed reforms following the conclusion of the review, and the consultation closed on 8 October 2025. The Government is now reviewing responses, and will set out its proposed next steps in due course. The review’s findings and the consultation on proposed reforms can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/fs-sector-strategy-review-of-the-financial-ombudsman-service.
The Government’s proposed reforms will not undermine the important role of the FOS in providing consumers with a cost-free route to quickly and easily resolve disputes with financial services firms. The review concluded that the FOS’s role providing an impartial dispute resolution service within the financial services regulatory framework should be preserved, and that the fair and reasonable test remains appropriate for its position as an informal alternative to the courts.
The Government is proposing that the fair and reasonable test should be retained and adapted to align with the overall regulatory approach for financial services, so that where conduct complained of is in scope of FCA rules, a firm will be considered to have acted fairly and reasonably.
These reforms will improve the regulatory coherence between the FOS and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), to deliver a more consistent and predictable regulatory environment, which the Government believes will benefit both consumers and industry..
The 79th Group is subject to an ongoing investigation by The City of London Police. As such the Government is unable to comment on the specifics of the case. However, the FCA and PSR have recently written to financial services firms setting out their expectation that firms should determine whether any claims, or parts of claims, are a qualifying APP scam, on an individual basis.
|
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Thursday 23rd October John Whittingdale signed this EDM on Monday 27th October 2025 Attendance of the Attorney General at the Bar of the House on the Chinese espionage case 25 signatures (Most recent: 27 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Robert Jenrick (Conservative - Newark) That this House regrets the collapse of the prosecution of two alleged Chinese spies and is alarmed that the Attorney General, the Rt Hon Lord Hermer KC, was reportedly informed in August 2024 that the prosecution was at risk, yet has not publicly explained what actions he took to support … |
|
Monday 1st September John Whittingdale signed this EDM on Monday 13th October 2025 Commemoration of the sinking of the Suez Maru and Allied prisoners of war lost 27 signatures (Most recent: 22 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) That this House solemnly commemorates the tragic sinking of the Suez Maru on 29 November 1943, in which 550 Allied prisoners of war, primarily British and Dutch, were being transported by the Japanese Imperial Army from Ambon to Surabaya; notes with deep sorrow that many of these prisoners, already gravely … |
|
Tuesday 1st July John Whittingdale signed this EDM on Monday 13th October 2025 Loan Charge and settlement terms offered to large companies and individuals 86 signatures (Most recent: 27 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Angus MacDonald (Liberal Democrat - Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire) That this House is deeply concerned at the treatment of those facing the Loan Charge; notes that instead of commissioning a truly independent review of the Loan Charge, Ministers announced a highly restricted review, conducted by a former Assistant Director of HMRC, Ray McCann, only looking at settlement terms; expresses … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
16 Sep 2025, 2:19 p.m. - House of Commons "today feels the man was worth the risk. >> Sr John Whittingdale. " Rt Hon Sir Alec Shelbrooke MP (Wetherby and Easingwold, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Oct 2025, 3:27 p.m. - House of Commons " So, John Whittingdale, thank you, Mr Speaker. " Rt Hon Sir John Whittingdale MP (Maldon, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
380 speeches (50,410 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Defence Mentions: 1: Wendy Morton (Con - Aldridge-Brownhills) Friends the Members for Maldon (Sir John Whittingdale) and for Tonbridge (Tom Tugendhat) talked about - Link to Speech 2: Stephen Doughty (LAB - Cardiff South and Penarth) Members for Maldon (Sir John Whittingdale) and for Islington North (Jeremy Corbyn). - Link to Speech |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Sep. 08 2025
2025 treaty on the British Indian Ocean Territory/Chagos Archipelago Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill 2024-26 Briefing papers Found: Sir John Whittingdale, referencing the June 2025 attacks on Iran’s nuclear sites by the United States |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 28th October 2025 9:30 a.m. Foreign Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the British Council At 10:00am: Oral evidence Scott McDonald - Chief Executive at British Council Kate Ewart-Biggs OBE - Deputy Chief Executive at British Council View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 4th November 2025 10 a.m. Foreign Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Climate diplomacy At 10:30am: Oral evidence Professor Corinne Le Quéré CBE - Professor of Climate Change Science at University of East Anglia, and Member at UK Climate Change Committee Clement Metivier - Senior International Advocacy Adviser at Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) At 11:15am: Oral evidence Peter Hill CB CVO - CEO at COP26, and Co-founder at NorthStar Advisory Professor Charlotte Watts CMG - Executive Director of Solutions at Wellcome View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 3rd November 2025 1 p.m. Foreign Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office At 1:30pm: Oral evidence Sir Chris Wormald KCB - Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service at Cabinet Office Sir Oliver Robbins KCMG CB - Permanent Under-Secretary at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) View calendar - Add to calendar |