Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps she is taking to reduce rates of reoffending for antisocial behaviour.
Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury
As part of the Safer Streets Mission, the Government is committed to improving confidence in policing and the local response to crime, including anti-social behaviour. Anti-social behaviour can be characterised by a range of different offence types, and we are responding in ways that are tough on crime whilst also supporting offenders to turn their backs on their offending behaviour.
We are tackling the root causes of reoffending by investing in a range of interventions which address offenders’ underlying criminogenic needs and support their rehabilitation journey. This includes accommodation, employment and substance misuse treatment services. Depending on the specific risks and needs of the offender, a range of accredited programmes, designed to address offending behaviour, are also available.
We are also making sure that punishment is tough. To do this, we will impose new unpaid work orders to ensure offenders pay back to society. For the most problematic and persistent community offenders, Integrated Offender Management reduces reoffending through intensive joint police-probation supervision and access to pathways and services that address underlying criminogenic needs. We will also expand the availability of Intensive Supervision Courts to address the causes of their offending behaviour.
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether she plans to introduce mandatory prison sentences for carrying bladed articles.
Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury
This Government is committed to tackling knife crime as a priority. We are clear that those who carry knives unlawfully must face serious consequences, and that sentencing must reflect the harm these offences cause to victims and communities.
In recognition of the seriousness of offences related to knives, the courts already have robust powers to deal with knife-related offences. The maximum sentence for possession of a bladed article or threatening with an offensive weapon is 4 years’ imprisonment. The law also provides for minimum custodial sentences for repeat knife possession and for threatening with a weapon. Adults convicted of a second or subsequent possession offence face a minimum of six months in custody, while those aged 16 or 17 face a four-month Detention and Training Order. Where someone is actually harmed by a knife or offensive weapon, there are a range of offences that the offender may be charged with, such as causing grievous bodily harm. These can result in lengthy sentences, up to life imprisonment.
Minimum and mandatory sentences are also rare in England and Wales. This is because it is, rightly, the function of the independent judiciary to decide the sentence in each case subject to the maximum that Parliament has provided and any relevant Sentencing Guidelines published by the Sentencing Council.
The existing framework provides the right balance between ensuring robust penalties for knife crime, and allowing courts to tailor sentences to the individual case.
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if she will increase sentences for offences committed with a knife.
Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury
Tackling knife crime is a priority and this Government is determined to do all it can to break the deadly cycle of violence that devastates the lives of individuals, families and communities.
The maximums available for existing knife offences include up to 4 years’ imprisonment for carrying a knife or threatening with an offensive weapon being 4 years’ imprisonment. Where someone is actually harmed by a knife or offensive weapon, there are a range of offences that the offender may be charged with, such as causing grievous bodily harm. These can result in lengthy sentences, up to life imprisonment. Sentencing in individual cases are a matter for our independent judiciary.
We will be reforming the sentencing framework in line with most of the recommendations made by the Independent Sentencing Review in May 2025 to ensure that our prisons never run out of space again, which would place the public at unconscionable risk.
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether she has had discussions with the Solicitors Regulation Authority on trusts that were under the authority of WW&J McClure solicitors.
Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)
The Ministry of Justice does not hold responsibility for informing clients about the status of their legal arrangements with private law firms. The legal profession in England and Wales is regulated independently of government. Responsibility for solicitors’ conduct lies with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), overseen by the Legal Services Board. The SRA’s role involves protecting clients and the public. The different ways in which they can provide support to consumers of legal services can be found on their website: SRA | What you can expect from us | Solicitors Regulation Authority.
The Government is aware of the issues surrounding WW&J McClures’ collapse, which involve multiple regulators responding to former clients across Scotland, England and Wales. Government officials have been engaging with the SRA, which has confirmed it is continuing to investigate the situation.
With regards to the issue of raising awareness among clients of McClures, there are requirements with respect to the advertising and publication of an insolvency so that creditors and other interested parties are made aware. The administration of McClures was advertised as required in the London Gazette. Information for former clients of McClures in Scotland was also published by Law Society of Scotland. For clients in England and Wales, the SRA also issued a public update, which remains available on their website SRA | WW&J McClure and Jones Whyte | Solicitors Regulation Authority
In addition, for clients of McClures across Great Britain, Jones Whyte published an extensive list of FAQs, covering the number of clients it had taken on, the steps it was taking to contact those clients, and the procedure for clients to transfer to another legal firm if they wished.
The Ministry of Justice has not held discussions with third-party intermediaries who were involved in selling trusts that were subsequently managed by WW&J McClures solicitors. Under the Legal Services Act 2007, the creation of a trust is not a reserved legal activity. This means that such activity may have involved individuals or organisations who were not regulated legal professionals. Where the sale of such trusts involved financial advice or services, this would be covered by the financial regulatory regime overseen by HM Treasury.
Officials from the Ministry of Justice have engaged with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) regarding the collapse of WW&J McClure solicitors and the regulatory concerns arising from their handling of client trusts.
The SRA has confirmed that it is carrying out an investigation into the former partners of the firm. As those individuals are no longer on the roll of solicitors, the SRA is limited in the enforcement action it can currently take. However, any concerns identified during the course of the investigation would be taken into account if any former partner seeks to return to legal practice.
The Ministry continues to monitor this issue through regular engagement with legal regulators and remains in contact with the SRA as it progresses its investigation. The SRA has published a public update on its website for affected clients and other interested parties: SRA | WW&J McClure and Jones Whyte | Solicitors Regulation Authority
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent discussions her Department has had with third parties who sold trusts that then came under the authority of WW&J McClure solicitors.
Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)
The Ministry of Justice does not hold responsibility for informing clients about the status of their legal arrangements with private law firms. The legal profession in England and Wales is regulated independently of government. Responsibility for solicitors’ conduct lies with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), overseen by the Legal Services Board. The SRA’s role involves protecting clients and the public. The different ways in which they can provide support to consumers of legal services can be found on their website: SRA | What you can expect from us | Solicitors Regulation Authority.
The Government is aware of the issues surrounding WW&J McClures’ collapse, which involve multiple regulators responding to former clients across Scotland, England and Wales. Government officials have been engaging with the SRA, which has confirmed it is continuing to investigate the situation.
With regards to the issue of raising awareness among clients of McClures, there are requirements with respect to the advertising and publication of an insolvency so that creditors and other interested parties are made aware. The administration of McClures was advertised as required in the London Gazette. Information for former clients of McClures in Scotland was also published by Law Society of Scotland. For clients in England and Wales, the SRA also issued a public update, which remains available on their website SRA | WW&J McClure and Jones Whyte | Solicitors Regulation Authority
In addition, for clients of McClures across Great Britain, Jones Whyte published an extensive list of FAQs, covering the number of clients it had taken on, the steps it was taking to contact those clients, and the procedure for clients to transfer to another legal firm if they wished.
The Ministry of Justice has not held discussions with third-party intermediaries who were involved in selling trusts that were subsequently managed by WW&J McClures solicitors. Under the Legal Services Act 2007, the creation of a trust is not a reserved legal activity. This means that such activity may have involved individuals or organisations who were not regulated legal professionals. Where the sale of such trusts involved financial advice or services, this would be covered by the financial regulatory regime overseen by HM Treasury.
Officials from the Ministry of Justice have engaged with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) regarding the collapse of WW&J McClure solicitors and the regulatory concerns arising from their handling of client trusts.
The SRA has confirmed that it is carrying out an investigation into the former partners of the firm. As those individuals are no longer on the roll of solicitors, the SRA is limited in the enforcement action it can currently take. However, any concerns identified during the course of the investigation would be taken into account if any former partner seeks to return to legal practice.
The Ministry continues to monitor this issue through regular engagement with legal regulators and remains in contact with the SRA as it progresses its investigation. The SRA has published a public update on its website for affected clients and other interested parties: SRA | WW&J McClure and Jones Whyte | Solicitors Regulation Authority
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps she is taking to inform clients of WW&J McClure solicitors that their trusts are no longer viable.
Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)
The Ministry of Justice does not hold responsibility for informing clients about the status of their legal arrangements with private law firms. The legal profession in England and Wales is regulated independently of government. Responsibility for solicitors’ conduct lies with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), overseen by the Legal Services Board. The SRA’s role involves protecting clients and the public. The different ways in which they can provide support to consumers of legal services can be found on their website: SRA | What you can expect from us | Solicitors Regulation Authority.
The Government is aware of the issues surrounding WW&J McClures’ collapse, which involve multiple regulators responding to former clients across Scotland, England and Wales. Government officials have been engaging with the SRA, which has confirmed it is continuing to investigate the situation.
With regards to the issue of raising awareness among clients of McClures, there are requirements with respect to the advertising and publication of an insolvency so that creditors and other interested parties are made aware. The administration of McClures was advertised as required in the London Gazette. Information for former clients of McClures in Scotland was also published by Law Society of Scotland. For clients in England and Wales, the SRA also issued a public update, which remains available on their website SRA | WW&J McClure and Jones Whyte | Solicitors Regulation Authority
In addition, for clients of McClures across Great Britain, Jones Whyte published an extensive list of FAQs, covering the number of clients it had taken on, the steps it was taking to contact those clients, and the procedure for clients to transfer to another legal firm if they wished.
The Ministry of Justice has not held discussions with third-party intermediaries who were involved in selling trusts that were subsequently managed by WW&J McClures solicitors. Under the Legal Services Act 2007, the creation of a trust is not a reserved legal activity. This means that such activity may have involved individuals or organisations who were not regulated legal professionals. Where the sale of such trusts involved financial advice or services, this would be covered by the financial regulatory regime overseen by HM Treasury.
Officials from the Ministry of Justice have engaged with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) regarding the collapse of WW&J McClure solicitors and the regulatory concerns arising from their handling of client trusts.
The SRA has confirmed that it is carrying out an investigation into the former partners of the firm. As those individuals are no longer on the roll of solicitors, the SRA is limited in the enforcement action it can currently take. However, any concerns identified during the course of the investigation would be taken into account if any former partner seeks to return to legal practice.
The Ministry continues to monitor this issue through regular engagement with legal regulators and remains in contact with the SRA as it progresses its investigation. The SRA has published a public update on its website for affected clients and other interested parties: SRA | WW&J McClure and Jones Whyte | Solicitors Regulation Authority
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if she will increase the length of sentences for people who commit violent crime against retail workers.
Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury
Sentencing in individual cases is a matter for the courts, and the courts have a range of sentencing powers to deal with each offender effectively and appropriately, including discharges, fines, community sentences, suspended sentences and imprisonment.
The maximum penalty for an offence is set by Parliament and is designed to cover the most serious imaginable behaviours that may fall under that offence. We continue to keep maximum penalties under review to make ensure they reflect the seriousness of the offending behaviour.
Under the previous Government, shop theft increased to an unacceptable level, with more and more offenders using violence and abuse against shopworkers. We will not stand for this as everybody has a right to feel safe at their place of work.
That is why, through our Crime and Policing Bill, we are introducing a new offence of assaulting a retail worker. The new offence will carry a maximum prison sentence of six months and/or an unlimited fine, matching the current sentence guidelines for common assault. It will also come with a presumption for a court to apply a Criminal Behaviour Order. This will prohibit the offender from doing anything described in the order, which might include a condition preventing specific acts which cause harassment, alarm or distress, or preventing an offender from visiting specific premises.
The Crime and Policing Bill will also introduce new measures to address the perceived immunity for ‘low value’ shop theft. With this change, there will no longer be a threshold categorising shop theft of goods worth £200 and under as ‘low value’. Instead, all cases of shop theft will be taken seriously irrespective of the value of goods stolen, with a maximum custodial penalty of 7 years. Shop theft of any amount is illegal, and repealing this legislation will ensure everyone understands this.
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether she plans to increase the length of sentences for shoplifting.
Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury
Sentencing in individual cases is a matter for the courts, and the courts have a range of sentencing powers to deal with each offender effectively and appropriately, including discharges, fines, community sentences, suspended sentences and imprisonment.
The maximum penalty for an offence is set by Parliament and is designed to cover the most serious imaginable behaviours that may fall under that offence. We continue to keep maximum penalties under review to make ensure they reflect the seriousness of the offending behaviour.
Under the previous Government, shop theft increased to an unacceptable level, with more and more offenders using violence and abuse against shopworkers. We will not stand for this as everybody has a right to feel safe at their place of work.
That is why, through our Crime and Policing Bill, we are introducing a new offence of assaulting a retail worker. The new offence will carry a maximum prison sentence of six months and/or an unlimited fine, matching the current sentence guidelines for common assault. It will also come with a presumption for a court to apply a Criminal Behaviour Order. This will prohibit the offender from doing anything described in the order, which might include a condition preventing specific acts which cause harassment, alarm or distress, or preventing an offender from visiting specific premises.
The Crime and Policing Bill will also introduce new measures to address the perceived immunity for ‘low value’ shop theft. With this change, there will no longer be a threshold categorising shop theft of goods worth £200 and under as ‘low value’. Instead, all cases of shop theft will be taken seriously irrespective of the value of goods stolen, with a maximum custodial penalty of 7 years. Shop theft of any amount is illegal, and repealing this legislation will ensure everyone understands this.
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people were assessed for a role in the Prison Service by nationality in the latest period for which data is available.
Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury
The Department welcomes job applications from everyone, irrespective of background, identity, experience, or circumstance, and particularly those underrepresented in our workforce.
The number of people assessed for a role in the prison service by nationality from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024 is provided in the attached table 1.
All staff undergo robust assessments and training before they work in prisons. Our strengthened vetting process roots out those who fall below our high standards.
Asked by: Lee Anderson (Reform UK - Ashfield)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people applied to join the Prison Service by nationality in the latest period for which data is available.
Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury
The Department welcomes job applications from everyone, irrespective of background, identity, experience, or circumstance, and particularly those underrepresented in our workforce.
The number of people who applied for a role in the prison service by nationality from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024 is provided in the attached table 1.
All staff undergo robust assessments and training before they work in prisons. Our strengthened vetting process roots out those who fall below our high standards