Mark Sewards Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Mark Sewards

Information between 15th April 2026 - 25th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 245 Labour Aye votes vs 4 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 261 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 162
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157


Speeches
Mark Sewards speeches from: Business of the House
Mark Sewards contributed 1 speech (105 words)
Thursday 23rd April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Leader of the House
Mark Sewards speeches from: Antisemitic Attacks
Mark Sewards contributed 1 speech (117 words)
Monday 20th April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office


Written Answers
Nitrous Oxide: Misuse
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to increase public awareness of the health risks associated with inhaling nitrous oxide.

Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Department has worked with the Personal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) Association to develop lesson plans on drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, which include specific references to the dangers of nitrous oxide. The lesson plans target primary and secondary students, teaching them how to manage influences and pressure, and keep themselves healthy and safe. They are available at the following link:

https://pshe-association.org.uk/drugeducation

The Government also has a drug and information and advice service called Talk to FRANK, which aims to reduce drug and alcohol misuse and its harms by providing awareness to young people, parents, and concerned others. Information on nitrous oxide and the danger of its misuse is available at the following link:

https://www.talktofrank.com/drug/nitrous-oxide

Nitrous Oxide: Sales
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps her Department is taking to tackle the unlawful (a) sale and (b) supply of nitrous oxide.

Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)

The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2023 came into force on 8 November 2023, classifying nitrous oxide as a Class C drug. It is illegal to produce, supply, import or export nitrous oxide where a person knows, or is reckless as to whether, it will be consumed for its psychoactive effects. The Home Office is responsible for drug policy and legislation.

Schedule 20 to the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Act 2024 includes a provision prohibiting advertisements directly encouraging children to buy, or persuade their parents or other adults to buy, products for them. This prohibits retailers from advertising nitrous oxide to those under the age of 18 across any medium, including online.

Surgical Mesh Implants: Compensation
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Tuesday 21st April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has considered the potential merits of establishing a compensation scheme for women who have experienced harm associated with pelvic mesh implants.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government is carefully considering the work done by the Patient Safety Commissioner and her report, which set out recommendations for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh, including options for financial compensation.

The Government has deep sympathy for all those affected and recognises the profound impact that these harms have had on individuals and their families.

My Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, has been clear that he wants to make meaningful progress during this Parliament, although a decision to provide compensation has not yet been made. We recognise how difficult and disappointing this uncertainty is for those affected, and we will ensure that the public is kept informed as soon as any decision on redress is made.

I met with the Patient Safety Commissioner, Dr Henrietta Hughes since I have been in post, and had a very fruitful discussion about the ongoing health initiatives led by the Department regarding sodium valproate and pelvic mesh. Details of the Government’s work to date are set out in recent letters to the Dr Hughes, which are published on her website.

Iran: Media
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Tuesday 21st April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of potential impacts of activities of Iranian state-affiliated media organisations, including Press TV, operating in the United Kingdom on the public; and whether she has considered aligning the UK’s approach with that of allies who have taken action against such entities.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

We work closely with a range of partners to tackle malign state-backed influence and interference in our society. Where there is clear evidence that Iranian-linked or aligned organisations are undertaking unacceptable activity, the Government will respond accordingly.

We will continue to use all appropriate tools at our disposal to protect against these threats. This includes placing Iran on the enhanced tier of the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) to bolster our oversight of Iran’s influence activities. The enhanced tier of the FIRS requires individuals and organisations to register arrangements with specified foreign powers or entities that may pose a risk to the UK's safety and interests. In addition to this, the UK has 550 sanctioned more than 550 Iranian individuals and organisations. This includes the IRGC in its entirety.

National Security: Iran
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Tuesday 21st April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of reports that Press TV is being used to identify and assess individuals in the United Kingdom for potential recruitment by Iranian intelligence services; and what steps she is taking to protect UK residents, including members of the Jewish community and Iranian diaspora in the UK, from such activity.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

The Government's first priority is our national security, and we will use all the tools at our disposal to protect the UK, and its people, from state threats. Where there is clear evidence that Iranian-linked or aligned organisations are undertaking unacceptable activity, the Government will respond accordingly.

The UK has a comprehensive set of measures to counter threats posed by the Iranian regime. The UK has sanctioned over 550 Iran-linked individuals and entities, including the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has been sanctioned in its entirety.  We have placed the entire Iranian State, including its intelligence agencies – the IRGC and MOIS – on the enhanced tier of  the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS). Any organisation in the UK that fails to declare a registrable arrangement with the Iranian state will be committing a criminal offence punishable by a substantial fine or up to five years in prison.

Furthermore, we engage directly with communities who may be at heightened risk, including members of the Jewish community and the Iranian diaspora. The National Protective Security Authority and Counter Terrorism Policing continue to provide protective security advice and support to individuals and organisations threatened by states.

Charities: Subversion
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Tuesday 21st April 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, with reference to Lord Walney’s March 2026 report entitled Undue Influence: The Iranian Regime’s Abuse of the UK Charity System, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the Charity Commission's powers to respond to concerns relating to hostile foreign state influence, including the Islamic Human Rights Commission Trust and the Islamic Centre of England; and whether she plans to increase those powers.

Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)

The Charity Commission is alive to the threat of hostile foreign state influence in charities and works with other agencies to protect the sector from the risks of being exploited. Any allegation or evidence of criminal offences, including terrorism, is referred to the police to investigate.

As part of the Government’s action plan for social cohesion we have announced that the Charity Commission’s powers to tackle extremist abuse of charities will be extended. This includes automatically disqualifying individuals with a criminal conviction for hate crimes from serving as charity trustees or senior managers, and helping the Charity Commission to disqualify charity trustees who have been excluded from the UK, deprived of British citizenship or are engaged in conduct which promotes violence or hatred.

HMRC require that for a charity to qualify for an exemption from tax, their income and gains should be applied solely to charitable purposes. Charities may use Gift Aid funds for purposes that align with their charitable objectives and comply with UK charity law. Misuse would breach the Charity Commission rules and could result in regulatory action and tax charges.

Charities: Subversion
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Tuesday 21st April 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, with reference to Lord Walney’s March 2026 report entitled Undue Influence: The Iranian Regime’s Abuse of the UK Charity System, if she will ensure that charities subject to live Charity Commission investigations relating to hostile foreign state influence and extremism do not receive public support mechanisms, including Gift Aid.

Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)

The Charity Commission is alive to the threat of hostile foreign state influence in charities and works with other agencies to protect the sector from the risks of being exploited. Any allegation or evidence of criminal offences, including terrorism, is referred to the police to investigate.

As part of the Government’s action plan for social cohesion we have announced that the Charity Commission’s powers to tackle extremist abuse of charities will be extended. This includes automatically disqualifying individuals with a criminal conviction for hate crimes from serving as charity trustees or senior managers, and helping the Charity Commission to disqualify charity trustees who have been excluded from the UK, deprived of British citizenship or are engaged in conduct which promotes violence or hatred.

HMRC require that for a charity to qualify for an exemption from tax, their income and gains should be applied solely to charitable purposes. Charities may use Gift Aid funds for purposes that align with their charitable objectives and comply with UK charity law. Misuse would breach the Charity Commission rules and could result in regulatory action and tax charges.

Cryptocurrencies: Regulation
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Tuesday 21st April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment she has made of the adequacy of UK financial regulations in preventing hostile states, including Iran, from exploiting cryptocurrency platforms accessible in the United Kingdom to raise funds.

Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

The UK has a robust anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist financing and sanctions regime to counter hostile state activity.

Cryptoassets are in scope of the UK’s Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Regulations, which require regulated firms to apply enhanced due diligence to business relationships and transactions involving high risk third countries, including Iran. This includes verifying customers’ identities and undertaking checks on source of funds and wealth.

The UK has imposed financial sanctions on Iran in response to their de-stabilising and hostile behaviour. These sanctions apply to cryptoassets as well as traditional finance. HM Treasury’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) delivered a cryptoasset Threat Assessment in July 2025 to support industry their implementation and compliance efforts.

Internet: Fraud
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Friday 24th April 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the impact of the Government’s 2026 Fraud Strategy on levels of fraud facilitated through online platforms before the Online Safety Act duties on fraudulent advertising take full effect.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

While the OSA continues to be implemented, fraud is a ‘priority offence’ under the Act, with platforms already required to mitigate against criminals using their services and to remove scam content if it appears. Ofcom has existing robust powers to act where services do not fulfil their regulatory obligations.

In the Summer, Ofcom is to go further, publishing its register of Category 1 and 2A services and consult on additional duties for these platforms to tackle paid-for fraudulent advertising.

The Home Office’s Fraud Strategy was published on 9 March and so Government has not yet conducted a review of its impact.

Internet: Fraud
Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)
Friday 24th April 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether her Department is taking steps to hold online platforms accountable for fraudulent advertising on their services prior to the full implementation of the Online Safety Act 2023.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

While the OSA continues to be implemented, fraud is a ‘priority offence’ under the Act, with platforms already required to mitigate against criminals using their services and to remove scam content if it appears. Ofcom has existing robust powers to act where services do not fulfil their regulatory obligations.

In the Summer, Ofcom is to go further, publishing its register of Category 1 and 2A services and consult on additional duties for these platforms to tackle paid-for fraudulent advertising.

The Home Office’s Fraud Strategy was published on 9 March and so Government has not yet conducted a review of its impact.




Mark Sewards mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

20 Apr 2026, 6:30 p.m. - House of Commons
" Mark Sewards thank you. >> Madam Deputy Speaker. Tonight, Panorama will air a documentary featuring members of the Jewish "
Mark Sewards MP (Leeds South West and Morley, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
23 Apr 2026, 11:44 a.m. - House of Commons
" Mark Sewards thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. One of my. breast. Cancer and subsequently received Universal Credit and incapacity benefit, but the DWP then stopped these due to some "
Mark Sewards MP (Leeds South West and Morley, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript


Select Committee Documents
Friday 17th April 2026
Special Report - 8th Special Report - Foundations of Learning: replacing RAAC and securing school buildings: Government Response

Education Committee

Found: Rebecca Paul (Conservative; Reigate) Manuela Perteghella (Liberal Democrat; Stratford-on-Avon) Mark Sewards

Wednesday 15th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Loughborough University, WPI Economics, City St George’s, University of London, University of Glasgow, Social Mobility Commission, Sutton Trust, and Centre for Social Justice

Realising potential: Delivering the Child Poverty Strategy - Work and Pensions Committee

Found: Sureena Brackenridge; Damien Egan; Dr Caroline Johnson; John Milne; Joy Morrissey; Darren Paffey; Mark Sewards

Tuesday 14th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Independent Provider of Special Education Advice, Let Us learn Too, Kids, and Disabled Children's Partnership

Education Committee

Found: Q29 Mark Sewards: I have a couple of questions for Amanda.

Tuesday 14th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), National Education Union, Local Government Association (LGA), and Speech and Language UK

Education Committee

Found: Q29 Mark Sewards: I have a couple of questions for Amanda.




Mark Sewards - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 28th April 2026 9 a.m.
Education Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Screen Time and Social Media
At 9:45am: Oral evidence
Esther Ghey - Founder and Director at Brianna Ghey Legacy Project
Mr Andy Burrows - CEO at Molly Rose Foundation
Rani Govender - Associate Head of Policy and Public Affairs at National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC)
At 10:45am: Oral evidence
Daniel Kebede - General Secretary at National Education Union (NEU)
Tom Middlehurst - Deputy Director of Policy at The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL)
Darren Northcott - National Official (Education) at NASUWT The Teachers' Union
At 11:30am: Oral evidence
Jacqueline Beauchere - Senior Director, Global Head of Platform Safety at Snapchat
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 13th May 2026 2:30 p.m.
Education Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Reading for Pleasure
At 3:00pm: Oral evidence
Frank Young - Chief Executive at Parentkind
Professor Christine O’Farrelly - Research Professor and UKRI Future Leaders Fellow, PEDAL Centre for Research in Play, Education, Development and Learning at University of Cambridge
Julie Cigman - Early Education Associate, consultant and author at Early Education
At 4:00pm: Oral evidence
Mrs Victoria Dilly - Chief Executive at School Library Association
Professor Robert Eaglestone - Professor of Contemporary Literature and Thought, Royal Holloway, University of London and Policy Lead at English Association
Dr Roger McDonald - Associate Professor of Primary Education (Literacy), Faculty of Education and Health at The University of Greenwich
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Friday 17th April 2026
Special Report - 8th Special Report - Foundations of Learning: replacing RAAC and securing school buildings: Government Response

Education Committee
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - RFP0176 - Reading for Pleasure

Reading for Pleasure - Education Committee
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - The Laurel Trust
RFP0032 - Reading for Pleasure

Reading for Pleasure - Education Committee
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - RFP0015 - Reading for Pleasure

Reading for Pleasure - Education Committee
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - RFP0016 - Reading for Pleasure

Reading for Pleasure - Education Committee
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Wolfson College, University of Cambridge, and Freelance
RFP0160 - Reading for Pleasure

Reading for Pleasure - Education Committee
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Schoolreaders
RFP0103 - Reading for Pleasure

Reading for Pleasure - Education Committee
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - RFP0014 - Reading for Pleasure

Reading for Pleasure - Education Committee
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - RFP0021 - Reading for Pleasure

Reading for Pleasure - Education Committee
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Correspondence - letter from Minister for Early Education and Minister for Equalities on consultation on proposals to update the School Food Standards dated 10.04.26

Education Committee
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Correspondence - letter from Minister for Children and Families on early deaths in care experienced young people dated 15.04.26

Education Committee
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence with OCR (Oxford, Cambridge and RSA) on Withdrawal of Selected Cambridge OCR General Qualifications dated 20.04.26

Education Committee
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Oral Evidence - Meta, Roblox, and TikTok

Education Committee
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Oral Evidence - TikTok, Meta, and Roblox

Education Committee
Tuesday 14th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), National Education Union, Local Government Association (LGA), and Speech and Language UK

Education Committee
Tuesday 14th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Independent Provider of Special Education Advice, Let Us learn Too, Kids, and Disabled Children's Partnership

Education Committee
Thursday 23rd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence on Weekend Maintenance Loans dated 21.04.26

Education Committee
Thursday 30th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter to Secretary of State on response to Solving the SEND crisis report dated 29.04.26

Education Committee
Thursday 30th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter to Minister of State for School Standards on response to SEND consultation dated 28.04.26

Education Committee
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Brianna Ghey Legacy Project, Molly Rose Foundation, and National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC)

Education Committee
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Oral Evidence - National Education Union (NEU), The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), and NASUWT The Teachers' Union

Education Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Estimate memoranda - Department for Education Main Estimate Memorandum 2026-27

Education Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Estimate memoranda - Ofsted Supplementary Estimate Memorandum 2026-27

Education Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Estimate memoranda - Teachers’ Pension Scheme Main Estimate Memorandum 2026-27

Education Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Unison on Continuing provision of TPS and LGPS pensions in the higher education sector dated 21.04.26

Education Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Classical Association on Cambridge OCR regarding their withdrawal of selected general qualifications dated 22.04.26.

Education Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Snap Inc on attendance at Committee meeting dated 27.04.26

Education Committee
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Snapchat

Education Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence with Secretary of State on Historical Forced Adoptions dated 28.04.26 and 29.04.26

Education Committee
Tuesday 5th May 2026
Written Evidence - NASUWT - The Teachers' Union
AIE0210 - The use of Artificial Intelligence and EdTech in Education

The use of Artificial Intelligence and EdTech in Education - Education Committee