Mohammad Yasin Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Mohammad Yasin

Information between 5th March 2026 - 15th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 308 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 311
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 10 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 203
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 279 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 283
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 161
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 292
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 286 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 292


Speeches
Mohammad Yasin speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Mohammad Yasin contributed 2 speeches (83 words)
Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office
Mohammad Yasin speeches from: Middle East: Defence
Mohammad Yasin contributed 1 speech (87 words)
Monday 9th March 2026 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Defence


Written Answers
Registered Intermediaries
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)
Friday 6th March 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the median waiting time was between a request for a registered intermediary and allocation in each of the last three years; and what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of these waiting times on the (a) wellbeing of victims and (b) the progress of their cases.

Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The table below sets out the proportion of requests for a registered intermediary that were successfully matched, as well as those that could not be matched, were cancelled by the police or CPS, or where matching was still in progress at the end of the calendar year. This is broken down for victims, prosecution witnesses and defence witnesses for the calendar years 2022-2024 (the most recent years for which published data is available through the Witness Intermediary Scheme annual report):

Year

Allocation status

Defence Witness

Prosecution Witness

Victim

Total

2022

Matched

3 (100%)

733 (95.2%)

7,018 (95.5%)

7,754 (95.4%)

Unmatched

16 (2%)

179 (2.4%)

195 (2.4%)

Cancelled

21 (2.7%)

151 (2.1%)

172 (2.1%)

In Progress

4 (0.1%)

4 (0%)

Total

3

770

7,352

8,125

2023

Matched

1 (100.0%)

678 (94.4%)

8,077 (94.8%)

8,756 (94.8%)

Unmatched

19 (2.6%)

182 (2.1%)

201 (2.2%)

Cancelled

19 (2.6%)

183 (2.1%)

202 (2.2%)

In Progress

2 (0.3%)

79 (0.9%)

81 (0.9%)

Total

1

718

8,521

9,240

2024

Matched

4 (100.0%)

554 (93.3%)

8,789 (96.0%)

9,347 (95.8%)

Unmatched

10 (1.7%)

130 (1.4%)

140 (1.4%)

Cancelled

20 (3.4%)

164 (1.8%)

184 (1.9%)

In Progress

10 (1.7%)

72 (0.8%)

82 (0.8%)

Total

4

594

9,155

9,753

Unmatched cases include those where:

  • A Registered Intermediary (RI) could not be assigned to a case because the Witness Intermediary Team could not provide a RI within the timeframe specified by the end user,
  • A RI initially accepted the case but then withdrew,
  • the court agreed to adjourn a case and a new request reflecting the new trial date was generated.

Therefore, not all unmatched requests indicate that the individual did not have a RI for their case.

The National Crime Agency, who administer the Witness Intermediary Scheme on behalf of the Ministry of Justice does not collect waiting times between the making of a request for a Registered Intermediary, so no data is available on the number of cases that were delayed due to capacity constraints.

The Ministry of Justice does not hold data on the waiting time between the request for a registered intermediary and matching of the intermediary. The allocation of a Registered Intermediary in each case will be dependent on a number of requirements including the availability of the witness and the investigation officer as well the availability and skillset of the registered intermediary. Where a case is flagged as urgent, the National Crime Agency will endeavour to prioritise the case, including seeking registered intermediary support out of hours or at the weekend.

The Ministry of Justice recruits and trains Registered Intermediaries on an ongoing basis to meet growing demand. These are informed by annual gap analyses to ascertain where demand is growing. In the 3 years to 2024, we have recruited 88 additional RIs to the Scheme.

The table below sets out the rate at which requests for a Registered Intermediary (from both the police and CPS) in each police force area were matched in 2024. We do not hold data on waiting times for intermediaries. We also do not hold data broken down by Crown Court circuit.

Police Force Area

Cancelled

Matched

Unmatched

Total

Avon & Somerset

1 (0.6%)

173 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.7%)

177

Bedfordshire

1 (1.5%)

66 (97.1%)

1.0 (1.5%)

68

Cambridgeshire

2 (1.4%)

139 (94.6%)

6.0 (4.1%)

147

Cheshire

5 (3.3%)

145 (96.7%)

0.0 (0%)

150

Cleveland

6 (5.4%)

102 (91.9%)

3.0 (2.7%)

111

Cumbria

2 (3.4%)

56 (94.9%)

1.0 (1.7%)

59

Derbyshire

2 (0.7%)

294 (98.0%)

4.0 (1.3%)

300

Devon & Cornwall

12 (2.5%)

450 (95.3%)

10.0 (2.1%)

472

Dorset

1 (0.6%)

171 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.7%)

175

Durham

5 (2.3%)

213 (95.9%)

4.0 (1.8%)

222

Dyfed-Powys

1 (1.4%)

69 (98.6%)

0.0 (0%)

70

Essex

5 (2.0%)

234 (95.9%)

5.0 (2.0%)

244

Gloucestershire

3 (2.2%)

129 (96.3%)

2.0 (1.5%)

134

Greater Manchester

6 (2.7%)

214 (96.4%)

2.0 (0.9%)

222

Gwent

2 (1.3%)

148 (95.5%)

5.0 (3.2%)

155

Hampshire

5 (1.5%)

318 (96.7%)

6.0 (1.8%)

329

Hertfordshire

1 (1.5%)

66 (97.1%)

1.0 (1.5%)

68

Humberside

3 (1.9%)

152 (98.1%)

0.0 (0%)

155

Kent

7 (1.6%)

421 (96.8%)

7.0 (1.6%)

435

Lancashire

0.0 (0%)

251 (99.2%)

2 (0.8%)

253

Leicestershire

3 (2.1%)

137 (95.1%)

4.0 (2.8%)

144

Lincolnshire

7 (4.1%)

147 (86.5%)

16.0 (9.4%)

170

London

21 (2.6%)

769 (95.4%)

16.0 (2.0%)

806

Merseyside

3 (1.1%)

258 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.1%)

264

Norfolk

9 (6.5%)

119 (86.2%)

10.0 (7.2%)

138

North Wales

4 (2.5%)

154 (95.7%)

3.0 (1.9%)

161

North Yorkshire

4 (2.0%)

193 (98.0%)

0.0 (0%)

197

Northamptonshire

4 (2.6%)

149 (96.1%)

2.0 (1.3%)

155

Northumbria

10 (3.0%)

321 (96.1%)

3.0 (0.9%)

334

Nottinghamshire

7 (2.9%)

227 (94.6%)

6.0 (2.5%)

240

South Wales

2 (0.6%)

306 (96.2%)

10.0 (3.1%)

318

South Yorkshire

3 (1.0%)

303 (99.0%)

0.0 (0%)

306

Staffordshire

6 (1.8%)

319 (97.0%)

4.0 (1.2%)

329

Suffolk

3 (2.4%)

118 (95.9%)

2.0 (1.6%)

123

Surrey

2 (1.2%)

155 (96.9%)

3.0 (1.9%)

160

Sussex

8 (3.1%)

246 (96.1%)

2.0 (0.8%)

256

Thames Valley

5 (2.1%)

234 (96.7%)

3.0 (1.2%)

242

Warwickshire

3 (3.9%)

73 (96.1%)

0.0 (0%)

76

West Mercia

7 (2.3%)

285 (95.6%)

6.0 (2.0%)

298

West Midlands

13 (2.1%)

602 (96.8%)

7.0 (1.1%)

622

West Yorkshire

3 (0.8%)

377 (98.7%)

2.0 (0.5%)

382

Wiltshire

1 (1.2%)

83 (96.5%)

2.0 (2.3%)

86

Total

198 (2%)

9,386 (96.2%)

169 (1.7%)

9,753
Registered Intermediaries
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)
Friday 6th March 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of vulnerable (a) victims and (b) witnesses assessed as requiring a registered intermediary under the Witness Intermediary Scheme were allocated one in each of the last three years; and how many requests were (i) refused and (ii) delayed due to availability constraints.

Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The table below sets out the proportion of requests for a registered intermediary that were successfully matched, as well as those that could not be matched, were cancelled by the police or CPS, or where matching was still in progress at the end of the calendar year. This is broken down for victims, prosecution witnesses and defence witnesses for the calendar years 2022-2024 (the most recent years for which published data is available through the Witness Intermediary Scheme annual report):

Year

Allocation status

Defence Witness

Prosecution Witness

Victim

Total

2022

Matched

3 (100%)

733 (95.2%)

7,018 (95.5%)

7,754 (95.4%)

Unmatched

16 (2%)

179 (2.4%)

195 (2.4%)

Cancelled

21 (2.7%)

151 (2.1%)

172 (2.1%)

In Progress

4 (0.1%)

4 (0%)

Total

3

770

7,352

8,125

2023

Matched

1 (100.0%)

678 (94.4%)

8,077 (94.8%)

8,756 (94.8%)

Unmatched

19 (2.6%)

182 (2.1%)

201 (2.2%)

Cancelled

19 (2.6%)

183 (2.1%)

202 (2.2%)

In Progress

2 (0.3%)

79 (0.9%)

81 (0.9%)

Total

1

718

8,521

9,240

2024

Matched

4 (100.0%)

554 (93.3%)

8,789 (96.0%)

9,347 (95.8%)

Unmatched

10 (1.7%)

130 (1.4%)

140 (1.4%)

Cancelled

20 (3.4%)

164 (1.8%)

184 (1.9%)

In Progress

10 (1.7%)

72 (0.8%)

82 (0.8%)

Total

4

594

9,155

9,753

Unmatched cases include those where:

  • A Registered Intermediary (RI) could not be assigned to a case because the Witness Intermediary Team could not provide a RI within the timeframe specified by the end user,
  • A RI initially accepted the case but then withdrew,
  • the court agreed to adjourn a case and a new request reflecting the new trial date was generated.

Therefore, not all unmatched requests indicate that the individual did not have a RI for their case.

The National Crime Agency, who administer the Witness Intermediary Scheme on behalf of the Ministry of Justice does not collect waiting times between the making of a request for a Registered Intermediary, so no data is available on the number of cases that were delayed due to capacity constraints.

The Ministry of Justice does not hold data on the waiting time between the request for a registered intermediary and matching of the intermediary. The allocation of a Registered Intermediary in each case will be dependent on a number of requirements including the availability of the witness and the investigation officer as well the availability and skillset of the registered intermediary. Where a case is flagged as urgent, the National Crime Agency will endeavour to prioritise the case, including seeking registered intermediary support out of hours or at the weekend.

The Ministry of Justice recruits and trains Registered Intermediaries on an ongoing basis to meet growing demand. These are informed by annual gap analyses to ascertain where demand is growing. In the 3 years to 2024, we have recruited 88 additional RIs to the Scheme.

The table below sets out the rate at which requests for a Registered Intermediary (from both the police and CPS) in each police force area were matched in 2024. We do not hold data on waiting times for intermediaries. We also do not hold data broken down by Crown Court circuit.

Police Force Area

Cancelled

Matched

Unmatched

Total

Avon & Somerset

1 (0.6%)

173 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.7%)

177

Bedfordshire

1 (1.5%)

66 (97.1%)

1.0 (1.5%)

68

Cambridgeshire

2 (1.4%)

139 (94.6%)

6.0 (4.1%)

147

Cheshire

5 (3.3%)

145 (96.7%)

0.0 (0%)

150

Cleveland

6 (5.4%)

102 (91.9%)

3.0 (2.7%)

111

Cumbria

2 (3.4%)

56 (94.9%)

1.0 (1.7%)

59

Derbyshire

2 (0.7%)

294 (98.0%)

4.0 (1.3%)

300

Devon & Cornwall

12 (2.5%)

450 (95.3%)

10.0 (2.1%)

472

Dorset

1 (0.6%)

171 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.7%)

175

Durham

5 (2.3%)

213 (95.9%)

4.0 (1.8%)

222

Dyfed-Powys

1 (1.4%)

69 (98.6%)

0.0 (0%)

70

Essex

5 (2.0%)

234 (95.9%)

5.0 (2.0%)

244

Gloucestershire

3 (2.2%)

129 (96.3%)

2.0 (1.5%)

134

Greater Manchester

6 (2.7%)

214 (96.4%)

2.0 (0.9%)

222

Gwent

2 (1.3%)

148 (95.5%)

5.0 (3.2%)

155

Hampshire

5 (1.5%)

318 (96.7%)

6.0 (1.8%)

329

Hertfordshire

1 (1.5%)

66 (97.1%)

1.0 (1.5%)

68

Humberside

3 (1.9%)

152 (98.1%)

0.0 (0%)

155

Kent

7 (1.6%)

421 (96.8%)

7.0 (1.6%)

435

Lancashire

0.0 (0%)

251 (99.2%)

2 (0.8%)

253

Leicestershire

3 (2.1%)

137 (95.1%)

4.0 (2.8%)

144

Lincolnshire

7 (4.1%)

147 (86.5%)

16.0 (9.4%)

170

London

21 (2.6%)

769 (95.4%)

16.0 (2.0%)

806

Merseyside

3 (1.1%)

258 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.1%)

264

Norfolk

9 (6.5%)

119 (86.2%)

10.0 (7.2%)

138

North Wales

4 (2.5%)

154 (95.7%)

3.0 (1.9%)

161

North Yorkshire

4 (2.0%)

193 (98.0%)

0.0 (0%)

197

Northamptonshire

4 (2.6%)

149 (96.1%)

2.0 (1.3%)

155

Northumbria

10 (3.0%)

321 (96.1%)

3.0 (0.9%)

334

Nottinghamshire

7 (2.9%)

227 (94.6%)

6.0 (2.5%)

240

South Wales

2 (0.6%)

306 (96.2%)

10.0 (3.1%)

318

South Yorkshire

3 (1.0%)

303 (99.0%)

0.0 (0%)

306

Staffordshire

6 (1.8%)

319 (97.0%)

4.0 (1.2%)

329

Suffolk

3 (2.4%)

118 (95.9%)

2.0 (1.6%)

123

Surrey

2 (1.2%)

155 (96.9%)

3.0 (1.9%)

160

Sussex

8 (3.1%)

246 (96.1%)

2.0 (0.8%)

256

Thames Valley

5 (2.1%)

234 (96.7%)

3.0 (1.2%)

242

Warwickshire

3 (3.9%)

73 (96.1%)

0.0 (0%)

76

West Mercia

7 (2.3%)

285 (95.6%)

6.0 (2.0%)

298

West Midlands

13 (2.1%)

602 (96.8%)

7.0 (1.1%)

622

West Yorkshire

3 (0.8%)

377 (98.7%)

2.0 (0.5%)

382

Wiltshire

1 (1.2%)

83 (96.5%)

2.0 (2.3%)

86

Total

198 (2%)

9,386 (96.2%)

169 (1.7%)

9,753
Registered Intermediaries
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)
Friday 6th March 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the registered intermediary allocation (a) rates and (b) waiting times are in each (i) police force area and (ii) Crown Court circuits; and what steps his Department is taking to help ensure that all vulnerable victims have access to intermediaries.

Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The table below sets out the proportion of requests for a registered intermediary that were successfully matched, as well as those that could not be matched, were cancelled by the police or CPS, or where matching was still in progress at the end of the calendar year. This is broken down for victims, prosecution witnesses and defence witnesses for the calendar years 2022-2024 (the most recent years for which published data is available through the Witness Intermediary Scheme annual report):

Year

Allocation status

Defence Witness

Prosecution Witness

Victim

Total

2022

Matched

3 (100%)

733 (95.2%)

7,018 (95.5%)

7,754 (95.4%)

Unmatched

16 (2%)

179 (2.4%)

195 (2.4%)

Cancelled

21 (2.7%)

151 (2.1%)

172 (2.1%)

In Progress

4 (0.1%)

4 (0%)

Total

3

770

7,352

8,125

2023

Matched

1 (100.0%)

678 (94.4%)

8,077 (94.8%)

8,756 (94.8%)

Unmatched

19 (2.6%)

182 (2.1%)

201 (2.2%)

Cancelled

19 (2.6%)

183 (2.1%)

202 (2.2%)

In Progress

2 (0.3%)

79 (0.9%)

81 (0.9%)

Total

1

718

8,521

9,240

2024

Matched

4 (100.0%)

554 (93.3%)

8,789 (96.0%)

9,347 (95.8%)

Unmatched

10 (1.7%)

130 (1.4%)

140 (1.4%)

Cancelled

20 (3.4%)

164 (1.8%)

184 (1.9%)

In Progress

10 (1.7%)

72 (0.8%)

82 (0.8%)

Total

4

594

9,155

9,753

Unmatched cases include those where:

  • A Registered Intermediary (RI) could not be assigned to a case because the Witness Intermediary Team could not provide a RI within the timeframe specified by the end user,
  • A RI initially accepted the case but then withdrew,
  • the court agreed to adjourn a case and a new request reflecting the new trial date was generated.

Therefore, not all unmatched requests indicate that the individual did not have a RI for their case.

The National Crime Agency, who administer the Witness Intermediary Scheme on behalf of the Ministry of Justice does not collect waiting times between the making of a request for a Registered Intermediary, so no data is available on the number of cases that were delayed due to capacity constraints.

The Ministry of Justice does not hold data on the waiting time between the request for a registered intermediary and matching of the intermediary. The allocation of a Registered Intermediary in each case will be dependent on a number of requirements including the availability of the witness and the investigation officer as well the availability and skillset of the registered intermediary. Where a case is flagged as urgent, the National Crime Agency will endeavour to prioritise the case, including seeking registered intermediary support out of hours or at the weekend.

The Ministry of Justice recruits and trains Registered Intermediaries on an ongoing basis to meet growing demand. These are informed by annual gap analyses to ascertain where demand is growing. In the 3 years to 2024, we have recruited 88 additional RIs to the Scheme.

The table below sets out the rate at which requests for a Registered Intermediary (from both the police and CPS) in each police force area were matched in 2024. We do not hold data on waiting times for intermediaries. We also do not hold data broken down by Crown Court circuit.

Police Force Area

Cancelled

Matched

Unmatched

Total

Avon & Somerset

1 (0.6%)

173 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.7%)

177

Bedfordshire

1 (1.5%)

66 (97.1%)

1.0 (1.5%)

68

Cambridgeshire

2 (1.4%)

139 (94.6%)

6.0 (4.1%)

147

Cheshire

5 (3.3%)

145 (96.7%)

0.0 (0%)

150

Cleveland

6 (5.4%)

102 (91.9%)

3.0 (2.7%)

111

Cumbria

2 (3.4%)

56 (94.9%)

1.0 (1.7%)

59

Derbyshire

2 (0.7%)

294 (98.0%)

4.0 (1.3%)

300

Devon & Cornwall

12 (2.5%)

450 (95.3%)

10.0 (2.1%)

472

Dorset

1 (0.6%)

171 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.7%)

175

Durham

5 (2.3%)

213 (95.9%)

4.0 (1.8%)

222

Dyfed-Powys

1 (1.4%)

69 (98.6%)

0.0 (0%)

70

Essex

5 (2.0%)

234 (95.9%)

5.0 (2.0%)

244

Gloucestershire

3 (2.2%)

129 (96.3%)

2.0 (1.5%)

134

Greater Manchester

6 (2.7%)

214 (96.4%)

2.0 (0.9%)

222

Gwent

2 (1.3%)

148 (95.5%)

5.0 (3.2%)

155

Hampshire

5 (1.5%)

318 (96.7%)

6.0 (1.8%)

329

Hertfordshire

1 (1.5%)

66 (97.1%)

1.0 (1.5%)

68

Humberside

3 (1.9%)

152 (98.1%)

0.0 (0%)

155

Kent

7 (1.6%)

421 (96.8%)

7.0 (1.6%)

435

Lancashire

0.0 (0%)

251 (99.2%)

2 (0.8%)

253

Leicestershire

3 (2.1%)

137 (95.1%)

4.0 (2.8%)

144

Lincolnshire

7 (4.1%)

147 (86.5%)

16.0 (9.4%)

170

London

21 (2.6%)

769 (95.4%)

16.0 (2.0%)

806

Merseyside

3 (1.1%)

258 (97.7%)

3.0 (1.1%)

264

Norfolk

9 (6.5%)

119 (86.2%)

10.0 (7.2%)

138

North Wales

4 (2.5%)

154 (95.7%)

3.0 (1.9%)

161

North Yorkshire

4 (2.0%)

193 (98.0%)

0.0 (0%)

197

Northamptonshire

4 (2.6%)

149 (96.1%)

2.0 (1.3%)

155

Northumbria

10 (3.0%)

321 (96.1%)

3.0 (0.9%)

334

Nottinghamshire

7 (2.9%)

227 (94.6%)

6.0 (2.5%)

240

South Wales

2 (0.6%)

306 (96.2%)

10.0 (3.1%)

318

South Yorkshire

3 (1.0%)

303 (99.0%)

0.0 (0%)

306

Staffordshire

6 (1.8%)

319 (97.0%)

4.0 (1.2%)

329

Suffolk

3 (2.4%)

118 (95.9%)

2.0 (1.6%)

123

Surrey

2 (1.2%)

155 (96.9%)

3.0 (1.9%)

160

Sussex

8 (3.1%)

246 (96.1%)

2.0 (0.8%)

256

Thames Valley

5 (2.1%)

234 (96.7%)

3.0 (1.2%)

242

Warwickshire

3 (3.9%)

73 (96.1%)

0.0 (0%)

76

West Mercia

7 (2.3%)

285 (95.6%)

6.0 (2.0%)

298

West Midlands

13 (2.1%)

602 (96.8%)

7.0 (1.1%)

622

West Yorkshire

3 (0.8%)

377 (98.7%)

2.0 (0.5%)

382

Wiltshire

1 (1.2%)

83 (96.5%)

2.0 (2.3%)

86

Total

198 (2%)

9,386 (96.2%)

169 (1.7%)

9,753
Social Media: Young People
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)
Tuesday 10th March 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to support the mental health of young people reliant on online communities for emotional and social support.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The government recognises that for many young people, online communities can play an important role in providing emotional and social support. It is vital that these online spaces are safe. Through the Online Safety Act, in-scope services are required to protect children from illegal and harmful and age-inappropriate content.

On 2 March, the government launched a consultation which will explore options to ensure children’s experiences online are safe and enriching.

The Department of Health and Social Care is working to improve access to mental health support for young people, both online and offline.
Social Media: Children
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)
Tuesday 10th March 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether she plans to evaluate the potential impact of the proposed under-16 social media ban on young people’s access to support and educational resources.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The government recognises that there are benefits for children being online and for many young people, online services can play an important role in providing support and access to educational resources.

On 2 March, the government launched a consultation on how to ensure children can grow up with a safer and more enriching relationship with the online world. The consultation seeks views on a range of options to help shape our next steps and the potential impacts of these.
Trade Unions: Public Consultation
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)
Thursday 12th March 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, when he plans to publish the response to the consultation on trade union right of access to workplaces.

Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)

Officials are in the process of reviewing the responses to the consultation, and the government will publish a formal response in due course.


Early Day Motions Signed
Tuesday 3rd February
Mohammad Yasin signed this EDM on Wednesday 25th March 2026

New US sanctions on Cuba

109 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026)
Tabled by: Steve Witherden (Labour - Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr)
That this House expresses grave concern at the executive order signed on 29 January 2026 by US President Donald Trump, which unjustifiably declares Cuba as an “extraordinary threat” to the national security of the United States and authorises new sanctions against any country supplying oil to Cuba; notes that Cuba …
Thursday 12th March
Mohammad Yasin signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 12th March 2026

Closure of Al-Aqsa Mosque during Ramadan

35 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026)
Tabled by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East)
That this House condemns the closure of Al-Aqsa Sanctuary in Jerusalem by Israeli authorities during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan; notes that this action infringes Palestinians’ right to freedom of worship, violates Israel’s obligations under international humanitarian law and UN resolutions, and breaches the longstanding status quo governing the …
Tuesday 24th February
Mohammad Yasin signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 10th March 2026

Student finance

11 signatures (Most recent: 17 Mar 2026)
Tabled by: Peter Prinsley (Labour - Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket)
That this House notes with concern the growing complexity of the student loan system in England, including differing repayment thresholds, interest rates and write-off periods, which make it difficult for prospective students to understand their long-term financial obligations; further notes that many young people enter higher education without clear knowledge …


Mohammad Yasin mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.
9 Mar 2026, 6:40 p.m. - House of Commons
" Mohammad Yasin Madam Deputy Speaker, US and Israeli strikes on Speaker, US and Israeli strikes on Iran have pushed the region into deeper instability over a thousands of civilians, including children, "
Mohammad Yasin MP (Bedford, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
11 Mar 2026, 11:55 a.m. - House of Commons
" Come to Topicals Mohammad Yasin. >> Mr. speaker, following International Women's Day, this government is taking another step towards a fairer Britain. We have "
Rt Hon Bridget Phillipson MP, Minister for Women and Equalities (Houghton and Sunderland South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
11 Mar 2026, 11:55 a.m. - House of Commons
" Mohammad Yasin Mr. "
Mohammad Yasin MP (Bedford, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript