Rachel Hopkins Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Rachel Hopkins

Information between 21st October 2026 - 31st October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
27 Oct 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 66
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 10
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 11
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 15
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 11
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 11
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 11
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 11
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10
20 Oct 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10
21 Oct 2026 - Railways - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108
21 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 111
21 Oct 2026 - Support for Farmers - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 278 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 279
21 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland - View Vote Context
Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108



Rachel Hopkins mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Building Safety (Remediation of Unsafe Cladding etc) Bill
107 speeches (29,317 words)
2nd reading
Tuesday 27th October 2026 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Mentions:
1: Florence Eshalomi (LAB - Vauxhall and Camberwell Green) —(Rachel Hopkins.)Question agreed to.Building Safety (Remediation of Unsafe Cladding etc) Bill (Money - Link to Speech

Business without Debate
1 speech (6 words)
Tuesday 27th October 2026 - Commons Chamber


Department Publications - Transparency
Thursday 5th November 2026
Cabinet Office
Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: September 2026
Document: (webpage)

Found: Nil Return Laurence Turner Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Rachel Hopkins

Thursday 5th November 2026
Cabinet Office
Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: September 2026
Document: View online (webpage)

Found:

Rachel Hopkins

Thursday 5th November 2026
Cabinet Office
Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: September 2026
Document: (webpage)

Found: Nil Return Nil Return Laurence Turner Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Rachel Hopkins

Thursday 5th November 2026
Cabinet Office
Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: September 2026
Document: View online (webpage)

Found:

Rachel Hopkins




Rachel Hopkins - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 1st December 2026 11:30 a.m.
Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 11th November 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes of the Modernisation Committee in Session 2026-27

Modernisation Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
11 Nov 2026
Private Members Bills
Modernisation Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 10 Jan 2027)


The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry Private Members Bills, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons.

Private Members’ Bills can be introduced by MPs who are not Government Ministers, often known as backbench MPs. It’s up to the MP to choose the topic of the Bill. There are three ways in which an MP can introduce a Private Members' Bill: via the ballot, as a ten-minute-rule bill and as a presentation bill. Ballot bills have the best chance of becoming law, as they get priority for the limited amount of debating time available for Private Members’ Bills. 

As part of this inquiry, the Modernisation Committee will explore whether the amount of time allocated for considering Private Members’ Bills is right, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of debating these Bills on Fridays, and what the procedural implications would be of moving these debates to another day would be.

The Committee will also investigate the effectiveness of the ballot and the use of presentation bills and Ten-Minute Rule bills as mechanisms for introducing and progressing Private Members’ Bills.

The inquiry is focused on the process for Private Members’ Bills, rather than on the merits of individual Bills.

Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry.