Information between 8th January 2026 - 18th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 26 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Richard Quigley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Richard Quigley speeches from: Gambling Harms: Children and Young People
Richard Quigley contributed 1 speech (668 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Sovereign Grant
Asked by: Richard Quigley (Labour - Isle of Wight West) Friday 9th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how often HM Treasury reviews (a) the level of the Sovereign Grant, and (b) what criteria are used in that review. Answered by James Murray - Chief Secretary to the Treasury The requirements for reviewing the Sovereign Grant have been set by Parliament in the Sovereign Grant Act 2011, sections 6 and 7. The Government has also committed to bring forward legislation to reset the Grant to a lower level from 2027-28 once Buckingham Palace Reservicing works are completed. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 26th January Richard Quigley signed this EDM on Monday 26th January 2026 British forces on the front line in Afghanistan 48 signatures (Most recent: 28 Jan 2026)Tabled by: Adam Jogee (Labour - Newcastle-under-Lyme) This House expresses its sincere gratitude to all members of the British armed forces who served on the front line in Afghanistan with courage, bravery and skill; mourns the loss of the 457 personnel who made the ultimate sacrifice and lost their lives in Afghanistan serving freedom, decency and our … |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 9th January 2026
Report - 4th Report - Ministerial Statements and the Ministerial Code Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: Peter Lamb (Labour; Crawley) John Lamont (Conservative; Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Mr Richard Quigley |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Civil Service Commission At 10:00am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston - First Civil Service Commissioner at Civil Service Commission At 11:00am: Oral evidence Sir Laurie Magnus CBE - Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 28th January 2026 2:45 p.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Cabinet Office At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon Nick Thomas-Symonds MP - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office (Minister for the Constitution and European Union Relations) at Cabinet Office Catherine Little CB - Chief Operating Officer for the Civil Service and Permanent Secretary to the Cabinet Office at Cabinet Office Hermione Gough - EU Director at Cabinet Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Councillor Matt Boughton - Chair of the LGA Safer and Stronger Communities Committee at Local Government Association, and Leader at Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Councillor Iain Hamilton - Chair at National Association of Local Councils Kim Wright - Spokesperson on Leadership and Learning at Solace, and Chief Executive at Brent Council View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
23 Jan 2026
The work and performance of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 27 Feb 2026) The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee scrutinises the work and performance of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. New Ombudsman Paula Sussex CBE has been in post since August 2025 and the Committee plans to hold an oral evidence session with her and other senior leaders soon. The Committee is keen to examine the organisation’s priorities under new leadership, with the new corporate strategy due to be published soon, as well as its performance in handling individual complaints and utilising data to identify wider potential concerns in public sector administration. Read the call for evidence for more information. |