Information between 2nd March 2024 - 11th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 25th April 2024 Lord Hain (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: President Putin's re-election and sanctions against Russian individuals View calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 180 |
|
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 122 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 169 |
|
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 172 |
|
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 118 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 171 |
|
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 167 |
|
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 184 |
|
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189 |
|
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 181 |
|
13 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 96 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 154 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 124 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Hain speeches from: Foreign Affairs
Lord Hain contributed 1 speech (618 words) Tuesday 5th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Property Management Companies: Fees and Charges
Asked by: Lord Hain (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 14th March 2024 Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities: To ask His Majesty's Government what regulatory powers they have to ensure leaseholders are protected from unreasonable charges or inadequate services property management agents. Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities) By law all variable service charges must be reasonable and, where costs relate to works or services, the works or services must be of a reasonable standard and leaseholders may challenge them at the property tribunal. It is also a legal requirement for managing and letting agents in England to belong to one of the two Government approved redress schemes. The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill will make it easier for leaseholders to scrutinise costs and challenge the services provided by both landlords and property managing agents. The Bill includes measures to require landlords to provide further information to leaseholders upfront and increase the transparency of their service charges and administration charges, as well as providing more information to leaseholders when requested. For those homeowners on private and mixed tenure freehold estates, the Bill will also give them rights to challenge costs at the tribunal and improved rights of transparency of costs and services. The Government intends to work closely with stakeholders to determine the detail of how the measures will work to protect leaseholders, which will be set out in secondary legislation. These measures, alongside existing protections and work undertaken by industry, will make property managing agents more accountable to the leaseholders and homeowners on freehold estates that pay for their services, and we will keep under review the need for further regulation in the sector. |
|
Leasehold: Fees and Charges
Asked by: Lord Hain (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 14th March 2024 Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have any plans to launch a consultation about the experiences of leaseholders in relation to service charges. Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities) By law all variable service charges must be reasonable and, where costs relate to works or services, the works or services must be of a reasonable standard and leaseholders may challenge them at the property tribunal. It is also a legal requirement for managing and letting agents in England to belong to one of the two Government approved redress schemes. The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill will make it easier for leaseholders to scrutinise costs and challenge the services provided by both landlords and property managing agents. The Bill includes measures to require landlords to provide further information to leaseholders upfront and increase the transparency of their service charges and administration charges, as well as providing more information to leaseholders when requested. For those homeowners on private and mixed tenure freehold estates, the Bill will also give them rights to challenge costs at the tribunal and improved rights of transparency of costs and services. The Government intends to work closely with stakeholders to determine the detail of how the measures will work to protect leaseholders, which will be set out in secondary legislation. These measures, alongside existing protections and work undertaken by industry, will make property managing agents more accountable to the leaseholders and homeowners on freehold estates that pay for their services, and we will keep under review the need for further regulation in the sector. |
|
Property Management Companies
Asked by: Lord Hain (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 14th March 2024 Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the transparency of ownership structures of freehold property management agents. Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities) By law all variable service charges must be reasonable and, where costs relate to works or services, the works or services must be of a reasonable standard and leaseholders may challenge them at the property tribunal. It is also a legal requirement for managing and letting agents in England to belong to one of the two Government approved redress schemes. The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill will make it easier for leaseholders to scrutinise costs and challenge the services provided by both landlords and property managing agents. The Bill includes measures to require landlords to provide further information to leaseholders upfront and increase the transparency of their service charges and administration charges, as well as providing more information to leaseholders when requested. For those homeowners on private and mixed tenure freehold estates, the Bill will also give them rights to challenge costs at the tribunal and improved rights of transparency of costs and services. The Government intends to work closely with stakeholders to determine the detail of how the measures will work to protect leaseholders, which will be set out in secondary legislation. These measures, alongside existing protections and work undertaken by industry, will make property managing agents more accountable to the leaseholders and homeowners on freehold estates that pay for their services, and we will keep under review the need for further regulation in the sector. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Human Rights: Sportswashing
23 speeches (16,210 words) Thursday 21st March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: Lord Thomas of Gresford (LD - Life peer) South Africa play at Twickenham, I was confronted by a well-known Liberal—a friend of the noble Lord, Lord - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Hain, not currently in his place, spoke extremely powerfully at the Second Reading - Link to Speech |
|
Foreign Affairs
82 speeches (33,311 words) Tuesday 5th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Suttie (LD - Life peer) My Lords, it is always a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Hain, with all his experience.I have - Link to Speech |
|
Foreign Affairs
50 speeches (21,456 words) Tuesday 5th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton (Con - Life peer) a part of the unstoppable momentum that we need to see towards a two-state solution.The noble Lord, Lord - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 14th March 2024
Declarations of interest - Declarations of Interests - 14 March 2024 Windsor Framework Sub-Committee Found: British -Irish Parliamentary Assembly Baroness Goudie • No relevant interests to declare Lord |
|
Wednesday 13th March 2024
Oral Evidence - Cabinet Office, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, DEFRA, and Cabinet Office Veterinary medicines and the Windsor Framework - Windsor Framework Sub-Committee Found: Lord Hain: All of them. |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Mar. 22 2024
HL Bill 38-I(c) Amendment for Committee (Supplementary to the Marshalled List) Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: MOVED IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE [Supplementary to the Marshalled List] The Schedule LORD |
|
Mar. 18 2024
HL Bill 38-I Marshalled list for Committee Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: BARONESS BRYAN OF PARTICK BARONESS RITCHIE OF DOWNPATRICK LORD HAIN LORD THOMAS OF CWMGIEDD |
|
Mar. 15 2024
HL Bill 38 Running list of amendments Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: Clause 3 BARONESS BRYAN OF PARTICK BARONESS RITCHIE OF DOWNPATRICK LORD HAIN LORD THOMAS |
|
Mar. 14 2024
HL Bill 38 Running list of amendments Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: Clause 3 BARONESS BRYAN OF PARTICK BARONESS RITCHIE OF DOWNPATRICK LORD HAIN LORD THOMAS |
|
Mar. 13 2024
HL Bill 38 Running list of amendments Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: Clause 3 BARONESS BRYAN OF PARTICK BARONESS RITCHIE OF DOWNPATRICK LORD HAIN LORD THOMAS |
|
Mar. 12 2024
HL Bill 38 Running list of amendments Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: Clause 3 BARONESS BRYAN OF PARTICK BARONESS RITCHIE OF DOWNPATRICK LORD HAIN _ Clause 3, page |
|
Mar. 07 2024
HL Bill 38 Running list of amendments Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: Clause 3 BARONESS BRYAN OF PARTICK BARONESS RITCHIE OF DOWNPATRICK LORD HAIN _ Clause 3, page |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 20th March 2024 2 p.m. Windsor Framework Sub-Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
|
Wednesday 24th April 2024 3 p.m. Windsor Framework Sub-Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
|
Wednesday 1st May 2024 3 p.m. Windsor Framework Sub-Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |