Lord Inglewood Portrait

Lord Inglewood

Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary

Joined House of Lords: 23rd November 1989

Left House: 29th April 2026 (Excluded)


Malvern Hills Bill [HL] Committee
15th Oct 2025 - 22nd Apr 2026
EU Goods Sub-Committee
5th May 2020 - 31st Mar 2021
Lord Speaker's Advisory Panel on Works of Art
25th Jan 2017 - 23rd Oct 2019
International Relations and Defence Committee
25th May 2016 - 27th Apr 2017
Works of Art Committee (Lords)
8th Jun 2015 - 31st Aug 2016
National Policy for the Built Environment Committee
18th Jun 2015 - 11th Feb 2016
Extradition Law
12th Jun 2014 - 25th Feb 2015
Communications and Digital Committee
23rd Apr 2007 - 14th May 2014
Communications and Digital Committee
7th Mar 2011 - 14th May 2014
Opposition Spokesperson (Environment, Transport and the Regions)
1st May 1997 - 1st Jul 1998
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department of National Heritage) (Broadcasting and Tourism)
6th Jul 1995 - 2nd May 1997
Procedure and Privileges Committee
12th Jan 1995 - 8th Nov 1995
Refreshment Sub Committee
28th Mar 1995 - 8th Nov 1995
Captain of the Queen's Bodyguard of the Yeomen of the Guard (HM Household) (Deputy Chief Whip, House of Lords)
1st Jan 1995 - 1st Jul 1995
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
21st Jul 1994 - 11th Jan 1995


Division Voting information

Lord Inglewood has voted in 947 divisions, and 34 times against the majority of their Party.

8 May 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 15 Conservative Aye votes vs 185 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 218
8 May 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 7 Conservative Aye votes vs 180 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 194
2 May 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 17 Conservative Aye votes vs 194 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 242
30 Apr 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 17 Conservative Aye votes vs 195 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 244
30 Apr 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Conservative Aye votes vs 194 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 233
25 Apr 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 12 Conservative Aye votes vs 197 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 349 Noes - 221
18 Apr 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 22 Conservative Aye votes vs 183 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 225
29 Mar 2017 - Digital Economy Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 181 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 201
7 Mar 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Conservative Aye votes vs 208 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 268
5 Feb 2015 - Deregulation Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Conservative Aye votes vs 120 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 175
24 Jan 2014 - European Union (Referendum) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 145 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 158
24 Jan 2014 - European Union (Referendum) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 144 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 157
16 Oct 2013 - Care Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 139 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 224
10 Jul 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 37 Conservative Aye votes vs 47 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 267
8 Jul 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 50 Conservative Aye votes vs 63 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 314
8 Jul 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 50 Conservative Aye votes vs 50 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 278
5 Feb 2013 - Defamation Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 13 Conservative Aye votes vs 108 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 141
24 Apr 2012 - Protection of Freedoms Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 21 Conservative Aye votes vs 101 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 190
6 Feb 2012 - Protection of Freedoms Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 8 Conservative Aye votes vs 102 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 206 Noes - 194
31 Oct 2011 - Localism Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Conservative Aye votes vs 91 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 140
25 Nov 2008 - Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2008 - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Conservative Aye votes vs 19 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 116
25 Feb 2008 - Climate Change Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 71 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 123 Noes - 143
15 Jan 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 42 Conservative No votes vs 51 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 268
14 Mar 2007 - House of Lords: Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Conservative Aye votes vs 133 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 122 Noes - 326
22 Jan 2024 - Asylum: UK-Rwanda Agreement - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 8 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 171
6 Feb 2024 - Automated Vehicles Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 204
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 6 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 7 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 7 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 4 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 154
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 7 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 211
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 6 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 208
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 175
4 Sep 2024 - Holocaust Memorial Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Inglewood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 99
View All Lord Inglewood Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
(16 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Legislation Debates
Agriculture Act 2020
(7,581 words contributed)
Holocaust Memorial Act 2026
(5,473 words contributed)
Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025
(4,407 words contributed)
View All Legislation Debates
View all Lord Inglewood's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Inglewood, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Inglewood has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Inglewood has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 50 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
3 Other Department Questions
18th Jul 2023
To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker what plans there are, if any, for the traditional gas lamps on the Parliamentary Estate.

There are gas or combined gas and electricity lamps in New Palace Yard, Peers Car Park and Old Palace Yard and Black Rod’s Garden. Those in New Palace Yard have been degassed ready for conversion to electricity, with planning consent granted in 2019. The lamp columns and globes will remain unchanged after conversion and engagement continues with Westminster City Council and Historic England to ensure the new LED lights are comparable in appearance to the original gas. There are no immediate plans to convert other lamps to electricity, but all are due to be converted in the near future in tandem with other works impacting on gas supply pipes and in line with work to make Parliament more environmentally sustainable.

25th Jun 2019
To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker whether non-affiliated members of the House of Lords are considered for places on select committees; and if so, what criteria are applied as to whether or not places are offered.

Non-affiliated members who wish to be considered for appointment to select committees should write to me, as the Chairman of the Committee of Selection, setting out which particular committee they would like to be considered for and why. Representations that I receive are then put to the Committee of Selection for consideration when agreeing proposals to the House for membership of committees. In deciding whether to recommend a nomination the Committee of Selection will take account of the particular experience that the member concerned would bring, the current composition of the committee and the nature of its work, as well as any other relevant factors.

4th Nov 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many EU directives have been transposed into UK law without any additional material being included since the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and what percentage of the total number of directives transposed that number represents.

The information requested is not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost. However, in July 2011 the Government put in place its Guiding Principles for EU Legislation, which state that the Government will not go beyond the minimum requirements of the measure which is being transposed, save in exceptional circumstances. Since the Guiding Principles have applied there have been only five instances of new “gold-plating” of EU Directives that have placed additional costs on business which is attached.



Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Shadow Minister (Treasury)
2nd Dec 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans are in place to ensure those areas in England without mayors and not part of a combined authority will be represented in the Council of the Nations and the Regions to enable them to contribute and participate.

The membership of the Council of the Nations and Regions is drawn from the directly elected leaders of central, devolved and local government across the UK with additional devolved powers. On 16 July 2024 the Deputy Prime Minister wrote to all areas that do not have a devolution deal to invite them to come forward with a proposal. New Mayors established through this process would also be eligible to sit on the Council of the Nations and Regions. The Government is committed to working productively with local government and has established the Leaders Council to bring together other local government leaders and Ministers to identify and tackle the strategic challenges facing local government.

Baroness Twycross
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
4th Feb 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the number of people who are UK (1) citizens, and (2) residents who (a) have, or (b) are entitled to dual nationality of another EU member state.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the Authority to reply.

Dear Lord Inglewood,

As National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority, I am replying to your Parliamentary Question asking what estimate has been made of people who are UK (1) citizens, and (2) residents who (a) have, or (b) are entitled to dual nationality of another EU member state (HL13401).

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) publishes estimates of the UK population by country of birth and nationality based on the Annual Population Survey (APS)[1]. The latest estimates are for the year July 2017 to June 2018 and these show the number of British citizens resident in the UK was 59,216,000, with a confidence interval of plus or minus 364,000, and the citizens of other EU member states resident in the UK as 3,723,000, with a confidence interval of plus or minus 91,000 (all figures rounded to the nearest thousand).

In the 2011 census, ONS collected data about dual passport holders which is the closest approximation to dual nationality available. Table 1 below shows the numbers from the census. ONS has no data about entitlement to dual nationality.

Yours sincerely,

John Pullinger

[1]https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/datasets/populationoftheunitedkingdombycountryofbirthandnationality

8th Nov 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many holders of a British passport living outside the UK were not entitled to vote in the referendum on leaving the EU.

The Government does not hold this information.

5th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the percentage annual increase in construction costs in central London in each of the last ten years.

The Government does not collect data on annual increases in construction costs at local level. At national level, ONS data shows that the overall cost of construction, which takes into account materials, labour and overheads, has increased by 24% between December 2019 and December 2024. In addition, data published by DBT show that the cost of construction materials has increased by 37.1% between January 2020 and January 2025. Construction wage rates correspond to activity in the sector. ONS statistics show that the annual growth for regular pay in the construction sector was 6.6% in the year to December 2024.

25th Jun 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of incorporating lessons learned from the recent US bombing of Iran in the planned design of the repositories for the long-term storage of high-level nuclear waste.

The geological disposal facility will isolate and secure radioactive waste against credible threats, in accordance with regulatory requirements. The design of the facility will incorporate international learning, to contain the waste in engineered vaults at a depth of hundreds of metres, so that no harmful quantity of radioactivity reaches the surface environment. The independent Office for Nuclear Regulation is responsible for assessing the safety and approving security arrangements for the facility, and for securing compliance with those arrangements once a nuclear site licence has been granted.

Lord Wilson of Sedgefield
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
18th Dec 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the guidance available for organisations purchasing telecommunications services about the due diligence they should undertake.

The Government is committed to ensuring the security and resilience of the UK’s telecommunications networks and services, including supporting informed purchasing decisions by businesses and other organisations.

The Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 (TSA) amended the Communications Act 2003 to establish a robust security framework for UK public telecoms networks and services. Ofcom provides guidance to businesses purchasing telecommunications services and enforces protections for business customers through the General Conditions of Entitlement, which all telecommunications operators must meet to provide services in the UK.

The Government will continue to keep the security of telecoms networks under review.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
18th Dec 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of how aware organisations purchasing telecommunications services are of provider obligations under the Telecommunications Security Act 2021.

The Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 (TSA) established a robust security framework for UK public telecoms networks and services, placing new legal duties on public telecoms providers to identify and mitigate security risks. The framework is designed to ensure that security is embedded within the networks and services, so those using them can have confidence in their security.

DSIT works with Ofcom and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) to ensure providers are aware of their obligations. Ofcom produces annual security reports for the Secretary of State on providers’ compliance with their obligations in the Act, and their progress against the guidance measures set out in the accompanying Telecommunications Security Code of Practice. These measures have staggered implementation timeframes based on factors such as their complexity and cost.

The first report was published on GOV.UK in January 2025, and is available to organisations purchasing telecommunications services. The report helps the Government monitor compliance approaches across the sector, including progress against guidance measures in the Code of Practice as they fall due.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
17th Dec 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of security risks resulting from critical public services provided with telecommunications by organisations that are not in the scope of the Telecommunications Security Act 2021, and which are instead regulated by other countries.

The Government is committed to ensuring the security and resilience of the UK’s telecommunications networks and services. This includes regular assessment of security and resilience risks relating to such networks and services.

The Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 (TSA) amended the Communications Act 2003 to establish a robust security framework for UK public telecoms networks and services, placing new legal duties on public telecoms providers to identify and mitigate security risks.

Some essential services may use private telecoms networks outside the scope of the TSA. However, under the Network and Information Systems (NIS) Regulations 2018, operators of essential services are required to manage risks to those services resulting from their use of such networks. In addition, the National Security and Investment Act 2021 includes powers to scrutinise and, if necessary, intervene in foreign acquisitions or investments in the UK telecoms sector that may pose national security risks.

The UK government also works closely to promote the adoption of appropriate and proportionate telecoms security regulations by other countries.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
29th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the adequacy of the current framework for Ofcom in promoting economic growth under (1) the general duties of Ofcom under section 3 of the Communications Act 2003, (2) its interpretation through the Government's statements of strategic priorities, and (3) the growth duty extended to Ofcom.

Ofcom’s central duty is to further the interests of citizens and consumers, where appropriate by promoting competition, and having regard, amongst other things, to encouraging investment and innovation. Resultantly, Ofcom’s regulatory regime supports the drivers of economic growth in the markets they regulate, and the impact of this on these sectors can be seen, for example, in how the telecoms market has grown 25% in the last ten years.

The current statement of Strategic Priorities for Telecommunications, Spectrum Management and Postal Services was designated in 2019. The digital landscape and market conditions have changed significantly since then, and we are currently updating the Statement to respond to these changes and set out the Government’s key priorities for these sectors that support Government’s mission to kickstart economic growth.

30th Jun 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have any plans to leave the European Atomic Energy Community.

The implications of the European referendum result for our membership of the European Atomic Energy Community have yet to be determined. It will be for the Government, under the new Prime Minister, to begin negotiations to exit the EU and determine our future relationship with the European Atomic Energy Community.

11th May 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of leaving the EU on businesses that trade with Europe, and how those businesses may communicate that impact.

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. Ministers will correspond directly with my noble Friend.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Shadow Minister (Treasury)
13th Nov 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the Ofcom to ensure that all complaints regarding BBC productions are treated equally.

The principle of BBC First - where the BBC has the opportunity to try and resolve complaints about its content before consideration by Ofcom - was formalised by the BBC’s current Charter. The Framework Agreement then sets out considerations the BBC should take into account as part of its complaints procedures, including that complaints must be considered and resolved effectively.

If a complainant is not satisfied by the BBC’s initial response to their complaint, they have the option to escalate it for consideration by the independent regulator, Ofcom. The Framework Agreement requires Ofcom’s timely and effective handling of complaints referred on to it.

The forthcoming Charter Review will look at how the BBC can remain independent and accountable to the public it serves and continue to provide trusted and truthful news to combat an era of growing disinformation.

Baroness Twycross
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
13th Nov 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government, as part of the upcoming BBC Charter review, whether they will take steps to ensure that the BBC treats all complaints regarding its productions equally.

The principle of BBC First - where the BBC has the opportunity to try and resolve complaints about its content before consideration by Ofcom - was formalised by the BBC’s current Charter. The Framework Agreement then sets out considerations the BBC should take into account as part of its complaints procedures, including that complaints must be considered and resolved effectively.

If a complainant is not satisfied by the BBC’s initial response to their complaint, they have the option to escalate it for consideration by the independent regulator, Ofcom. The Framework Agreement requires Ofcom’s timely and effective handling of complaints referred on to it.

The forthcoming Charter Review will look at how the BBC can remain independent and accountable to the public it serves and continue to provide trusted and truthful news to combat an era of growing disinformation.

Baroness Twycross
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
8th Sep 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government how many people were employed by Historic England in (1) 2015, (2) 2020 and (3) 2025.

The average full time equivalent staff number employed by Historic England in (1) 2015/16 was 878, (2) 2019/20 was 828 and (3) 2024/25 was 982.

Baroness Twycross
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
5th Dec 2022
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to retain gas lamps on (1) their own, and (2) other publicly-owned, land.

The Royal Parks, a public corporation and independent charity, is contracted by DCMS to manage the Royal parks, which are Crown land for which management responsibility rests with His Majesty’s Government. There are approximately 360 gas lamps within the sites which The Royal Parks manages, of which approximately 215 are listed. There is no programme currently in place to switch existing gas lamps to electricity, but such matters are kept under review. My Department is not aware of any other gas lamps within our own estate.

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay
Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)
30th Apr 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have a target date for the introduction of electronic licences for the export of works of art; and if not, when they anticipate they will announce a target date.

The feasibility of electronic licensing for the export of cultural objects is under active consideration by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and Arts Council England. The Department recognises the potential benefits of an electronic system as a means of simplifying the export licensing system and speeding up processes at the border. We are working with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, Border Force, and organisations in the arts and museums sectors who export cultural objects, to understand what systems may need to be maintained or introduced by the end of the EU exit implementation period. We will set a target timeframe for introducing electronic licenses pending further investigation and decisions on the development and implementation options.

17th Jan 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they are proposing to seek an exemption from the provisions of the proposed EU Regulation on the import of cultural goods in respect of domestic personal effects of those proposing to live and work in the EU post-Brexit.

The proposed EU Regulation on the import of cultural goods is currently under negotiation with the EU. The UK’s future adherence to EU Regulations, will be subject to exit negotiations.

21st Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Neville-Rolfe on 20 July (HL1072), in the light of imminent decisions regarding the BBC's Charter, why they have made no estimate of when television will be delivered predominantly across the internet.

The Government’s BBC Charter Review public consultation is open until 8 October and no decisions on the BBC’s Charter are imminent.

Further to my answer of 20 July to Question HL1072, there is already a range of industry research on the future of television distribution and a wide variety of views about migration to internet protocol distribution of television services. This includes the 'Future of Innovation in Television Technology Report,' which DCMS officials contributed to, and which was published by the cross-television industry Digital Television Group in May 2014.

In May 2014, Ofcom's discussion document ‘The Future of Free to View TV’, also considered which trends that might make universal distribution of internet protocol television possible. In the statement on the future of 700Mhz spectrum, Ofcom concluded that: 'digital terrestrial television is likely to retain this central role over the next decade, with a full switch to alternative technologies such as IPTV not appearing until at least 2030'.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Shadow Minister (Treasury)
6th Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what estimate they have made of when television will be delivered predominantly across the internet.

The Government has made no estimate of when this will happen.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Shadow Minister (Treasury)
12th May 2021
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of education provision in Cumbria, following the closure of Askham Bryan College’s Newton Rigg campus; whether they have made any legal assessment of the implications of the closure of that institution; and what discussions they have had with the Further Education Commissioner regarding its closure.

A comprehensive analysis of local provision needs for Newton Rigg and the surrounding area was undertaken in 2020 by the Further Education Commissioner and the Education and Skills Funding Agency. The core objective of this analysis was to establish if there was a need for college provision within the general vicinity of Newton Rigg campus. It considered the location of neighbouring further education colleges in relation to travel to learn options and identified that the majority of enrolments could be accommodated at other statutory further education institutions. Where gaps in provision were identified, alternative arrangements for the next academic year have been introduced to ensure continuity of delivery after Newton Rigg closes.

If further evidence of gaps in provision are highlighted as a result of the closure of Newton Rigg in support of local authorities’ statutory duty to secure provision in an area, the Education and Skills Funding Agency will consider requests to fill a gap in provision. Where this cannot be met through negotiation with good existing providers the requirements are put out to tender through open competition.

We routinely consider the legal implications of decisions that are made.

Officials from the Education and Skills Funding Agency continue to work closely with the Further Education Commissioner’s team with regard to the closure of Newton Rigg.

28th Apr 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether it is their policy that farmers farming on common land are provided with equivalent financial support to those occupying freehold land.

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. Ministers will correspond directly with the Member.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
4th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of registration anomalies relating to common land; and what steps they are taking to rectify them.

The Government recognises that there are registration anomalies relating to common land arising from the former Commons Registration Act 1965. These include issues such as incorrectly drawn boundaries, buildings mistakenly included within registered commons, and land recorded that did not meet the legal definition of common land. Schedule 2 of the Commons Act 2006 provides mechanisms to correct such historic registration errors.

To support this process, and as part of the partial implementation of Part 1 of the Commons Act 2006, the Government has provided grant funding to a limited number of local authorities to undertake this work. Funding was initially made available to seven “pioneer” authorities from October 2008 and later extended to two additional authorities in 2014. These authorities—Cumberland Council and North Yorkshire Council—continue to receive funding to carry out their statutory duties under the Act. To date, they have been allocated £494,858 and £326,339 respectively, with funding scheduled to run until March 2027.

There are currently no plans to roll out Part 1 of the Commons Act 2006 more widely across England, but we will keep this under consideration.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
27th Jan 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the amount of land registered as common land which was incorrectly registered.

The Government has not made a formal assessment of the total amount of land incorrectly registered as common land. However, the Commons Act 2006 acknowledges that registration errors occurred under the Commons Registration Act 1965, including wrongly drawn boundaries, buildings mistakenly included, and land that did not meet the legal definition of common land. Schedule 2 of the Commons Act 2006 provides mechanisms to correct registration errors, but implementation is limited to specific areas with varying deadlines - applications closed in pioneer areas in December 2020, while deregistration applications in other English areas must be made by 15 March 2027.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
19th Jan 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to review legislation affecting common land.

There are currently no plans to review legislation affecting common land.

However, the Government has announced that we will bring forward an Access to Nature Green Paper by the end of this Parliament. This will provide an opportunity to feed in views on common land and related access issues.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
13th Dec 2023
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to introduce legislation along the lines of the proposed Forest Risk Commodity regulations in respect of foodstuffs produced outside the UK in a manner which is forbidden to UK producers of the same commodity.

The Government shares the public’s high regard for the UK’s environmental protections, food standards and animal welfare. All agri-food products must comply with the UK’s import requirements in order to be placed on the UK market. For example, hormone-treated beef and chlorinated chicken are banned in the UK and the Prime Minister has been clear that these will not be allowed to enter the UK market. This includes products from longstanding trading partners alongside products traded under the terms of new Free Trade Agreements.

The Forest Risk Commodities Scheme will be introduced through provisions in Schedule 17 of the Environment Act 2021. This new due diligence legislation requires regulated organisations to establish and implement a due diligence system for any regulated commodity, and any products derived from them, that they use in their commercial activities. The scheme will cover foodstuffs, including cattle products (excluding dairy), cocoa, palm oil and soy.

2nd Feb 2023
To ask His Majesty's Government how they intend to enforce their policy that food produced to lower environmental and welfare standards outside the UK will not be placed on the UK market, despite being allowed tariff-free access to the country.

The UK is a world leader on environmental and animal welfare standards. Environmental and animal welfare considerations continue to be central to our approach to agricultural trade in line with our clear manifesto commitment that the UK's high environmental protection, animal welfare and food standards will not be compromised by our trade negotiations.

Lord Benyon
Lord Chamberlain (HM Household)
7th Apr 2022
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Benyon on 6 April (HL7283), what plans they have, if any, to redress the strategic balance between food production, environmental protection and other priorities within rural land use policy in response to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Under the Agriculture Act 2020, we have a legal duty to assess the impact of all our schemes, including our new environmental land management schemes, on food production. The first Food Security Report was published in December 2021. The Government will continue to monitor the situation in Ukraine and respond appropriately.

Lord Benyon
Lord Chamberlain (HM Household)
23rd Mar 2022
To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to reconsider their priorities for agriculture and rural land use policy owing to the impact of the war in Ukraine.

On 30 March the Government announced steps to assist farmers, address uncertainty and keep costs down. Planned changes to the use of urea fertiliser have been delayed by at least a year. The delay has been made to help farmers deal with rising input costs and to give them more time to adapt.

The Government also published revised statutory guidance on how farmers should limit the use of slurry and other farmyard manure at certain times of the year. This will be supported through new slurry storage grants as of this year, helping farmers reduce their dependence on artificial fertiliser.

Alongside this, the Government has published further details on the Sustainable Farming Incentive. The scheme will pay farmers to build the health and fertility of their soil and reduce soil erosion which are essential for sustainable food production, helping to bolster food security and longer-term resilience of the sector.

The Government will pay farmers to help with the costs of sowing nitrogen fixing plants and green manures or in advance of their crops. This will help substitute some of their fertiliser requirements for the coming season and reduce their dependence on manufactured fertilisers linked to the price of gas. In addition, an industry fertiliser roundtable has been set up and chaired by the Farming Minister, to work on these issues, identify solutions and better understand the pressures facing farmers at this time.

Lord Benyon
Lord Chamberlain (HM Household)
6th Sep 2021
To ask Her Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of (1) the number of roadside ash trees in England, (2) how many of these trees will need to be felled due to ash dieback, and (3) the average cost of felling and removing each tree.

The Government has a long-established Ash Dieback Health and Safety Taskforce comprising the Forestry Commission, Natural England and key stakeholders such as the National Trust, Woodland Trust, Tree Council, CLA, Arboricultural Association, Highways Agency, Network Rail and ten Local Authorities, which meets regularly and guides our approach on reducing the impact of ash dieback on public health and safety.

Working with the Health and Safety Taskforce, we estimate that there are approximately four million ash trees situated alongside roads, of which a large proportion (approximately 1.4 million) will need to be managed. The costs of felling a tree can vary considerably, and we have used case study examples to help inform assessments – these examples range from £400-£500. A strategic approach to planning and coordination can help reduce costs, and to support Local Authorities and other regional bodies dealing with ash dieback, Defra has worked with the Tree Council to develop an Ash Dieback Toolkit. The Government has recently announced a new Tree Health pilot, which is designed to support action against pests and diseases affecting trees, the pilot includes support for diseased and infested trees outside of woodland, for example roadside ash with ash dieback.

Lord Benyon
Lord Chamberlain (HM Household)
23rd Jul 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the estimated total annual gross cost of the registration scheme outlined in the Ivory Bill in respect of pre-1947 items with low ivory content; and how many items they anticipate will be registered each year.

We are working on the design and development of the new IT system to facilitate the registration process, in line with the principles of managing public money. Those registering items will need to pay a fee to cover the costs of registration.

The data available does not provide an exact number of items in the UK that are made of or contain ivory. We are therefore unable to anticipate how many items owners may wish to sell, and subsequently register, each year under this exemption.

We will, however, once the ban is in force, be publishing headline data on the number of exemption certificates that have been issued for each category of exemption.

23rd Jul 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the estimated total number of items in the UK which fall within the Ivory Bill's definition of pre-1947 items with low ivory content.

During the consultation on our ivory ban, we sought evidence from the antiques trade and others, including on the nature and number of items in the UK that are made of or contain ivory. However, the data available is limited and we are therefore unable to specify how many items fall under this exemption.

However, once the ban is in force, we will be publishing headline data on the number of exemption certificates that have been issued for each category of exemption.

23rd Feb 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the Forestry Commission permits forms of shooting on any of its land in circumstances which fall within its definition of "free shooting".

The Forestry Commission only associates the term free-shooting with the control of grey squirrels for the protection of red squirrel populations and the reduction of damage to timber crops, not any other wildlife management activity.

There may be occasions where free-shooting takes place by the holders of Game Shooting Leases or by its own wildlife rangers. There may also be free-shooting of grey squirrels carried out where there are retained sporting rights over which the Forestry Commission does not exercise any direct control.

23rd Feb 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many grey squirrels were culled on the public estate in each Forest District of England and Wales in each of the last three years; and how many were culled by (1) trapping, and (2) shooting, in each of the years in each of the Districts.

The Forestry Commission does not hold records of the numbers of squirrels killed on the public forest estate in England. The Forestry Commission ceased to operate in Wales on 1 April 2013 with the creation of Natural Resources Wales and we do not hold any information on grey squirrel culling on the Welsh Government woodland estate.

2nd Feb 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Gardiner of Kimble on 1 February (HL5225) about grey squirrel control, what is their definition of "free shooting".

The Government does not have a standard definition for the free-shooting of grey squirrels. However, Forestry Commission England considers free-shooting of grey squirrels to be where they are shot in any circumstances other than after having been live trapped, lured into or located in a pre-prepared area with, for example, a ground feeding station and high seat to facilitate shooting with a safe backstop.

2nd Feb 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many people in England have been killed or injured during grey squirrel control with guns during the last decade.

This information is not held centrally. I can confirm that the Forestry Commission in England does not have any record of anyone being killed or injured during grey squirrel control with guns on the Public Forest Estate in the last decade. However, it does not hold any record of incidents elsewhere.

19th Jan 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government why the Forestry Commission refuses to allow the use of air rifles by experienced, trained, and insured volunteers as part of an integrated programme for grey squirrel control.

Landowners are free to choose any legal method to control grey squirrels on their own land and to choose the methods they believe to be most effective and appropriate in any location. However, Forestry Commission England currently considers that free shooting has limited effectiveness in controlling grey squirrel populations, with better, more effective methods often available. In addition, the majority of the public forest estate has unrestricted public access and public safety is of paramount importance. For these reasons the Commission does not allow the shooting of grey squirrels by volunteers on its land. Volunteers are, nevertheless, an essential part of controlling grey squirrels and control methodologies continue to be developed and evaluated against the criteria of efficacy, safety and animal welfare. The Commission is additionally encouraging improvements to other methods of control including trapping, as well as assessing the findings of a recent study from Ireland which suggested that an increased pine marten population may result in a reduced grey squirrel population.

The Commission is seriously concerned about the negative impact of grey squirrel populations on woodland and specifically on native woodland. The Government is committed to pursuing co-ordinated action at a national level and in conjunction with partners through the Squirrel Accord, to which both Defra and Forestry Commission England are signatories. Work is continuing to improve the effectiveness of control methods; the structure of grants has been changed to support grey squirrel control and substantial work continues with partners to support our red squirrel populations, including through the control of grey squirrels. The Commission is open to further engagement with national and local organisations as well as landowners sharing our commitment to grey squirrel control for the protection of woodland and red squirrel populations.

23rd Jul 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to publish a concise and comprehensive comparative economic analysis of the impact of (1) a no deal situation, (2) the arrangements set out in The future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and (3) remaining in the EU, before any meaningful decision about Brexit.

The Government is undertaking a wide range of continuing analysis and preparatory work, across a range of scenarios, looking at the implications of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. Our overall programme of work is comprehensive, thorough and is continuously updated.

The Government has confirmed that when we bring forward the vote on the final deal, we will ensure that Parliament is presented with the appropriate analysis to make an informed decision. At this stage of the negotiation, it would not be practical or appropriate to set out the details of exactly how the Government will analyse the final deal.

Lord Callanan
Shadow Minister (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
27th Jun 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure the continuation after Brexit of the Falkland Islands' current tariff-free access to EU markets for meat and fish products.

The Government has always been clear that we are committed to engaging the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories as we exit the EU, to ensure that their interests and priorities are properly taken into account.

We are seeking a bold and ambitious economic partnership with the EU and want to have the greatest possible tariff- and barrier-free trade with our European neighbours, so that British companies, including Falkland Islands companies, have the maximum freedom to trade with and operate within European markets.

DExEU Minister of State Robin Walker most recently met Hon. Teslyn Barkman, the Falklands Legislative Assembly Member leading on Exit issues, at the 4th Joint Ministerial Council Overseas Territories EU Negotiations held on the 14th of June. Through discussions in this forum, supported by official level contact, the Government understands the importance to the economic wellbeing of the Falklands Islands of their access to the EU market for fish and meat.

We also welcome the substantive input we have received from the Falkland Islands’ Government as the UK prepares to exit the EU.

Lord Callanan
Shadow Minister (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
26th Feb 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the statement by Baroness Evans of Bowes Park on 29 March 2017 (HL Deb, col 611), what is their definition of "frictionless trade".

We are seeking a bold and ambitious economic partnership that is of greater scope and ambition than any such existing agreement.

We want to have the greatest possible tariff- and barrier-free trade with our European neighbours, as well as being able to negotiate our own trade agreements around the world. That means, for goods, we want a customs trading relationship and agreement on non-tariff barriers that enables as frictionless trade as possible between the UK and the EU.

With regards to services trade, we will be seeking the broadest ever agreement that limits the number of barriers that could prevent UK firms from setting up in the EU and vice versa and avoids discrimination of each other's service providers. We also want to agree an appropriate labour mobility framework that enables UK and EU businesses and self-employed professionals to travel in order to provide services to clients in person.

We want to ensure that UK companies have the maximum possible freedom to trade with and operate within European markets – and to let European businesses do the same in the UK.

Lord Callanan
Shadow Minister (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
17th Jan 2017
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what factors underlie their intention to take the UK outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The people voted in the referendum to leave the European Union. This is why the Prime Minister has been clear that we intend to bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in the United Kingdom.

Leaving the European Union will mean that our laws will be made in Westminster, Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast, and those laws will be interpreted by judges not in Luxembourg, but in courts across this country.

10th Oct 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have any plans to preserve UK citizens' legal right to live in and travel freely across Europe following Brexit.

The Prime Minister has been clear that she wants to protect the status of UK nationals already living in mainland Europe, and that of EU nationals already living here. The only circumstances in which that would not be possible is if British citizens’ rights in other EU member states were not protected in return. UK nationals that have lived lawfully and continuously for a period of 5 years in a given EU Member State will automatically have a permanent right to reside there.

The reciprocal rights and entitlements that will apply following the UK’s exit are subject to the wider negotiation on our future relationship with the EU. We have not yet begun these negotiations, so it is not possible to set out any positions in advance. However, at every step of this negotiation we will seek to ensure the best possible outcome for the British people, at home and overseas.
11th Feb 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what was the average monthly payout for delays by Avanti West Coast on the West Coast Main Line in 2025.

The Government produces annual figures relating to the amount of delay repay compensation that is paid out by train operating companies including Avanti West Coast. The data for 2024-25 has been collected and will be published in due course. The data for 2025-26 will be collected at the end of the financial year and subsequently published.

In addition to data published by the Department, Avanti West Coast publish data by rail period via its website which may be found on Avanti’s website: https://www.avantiwestcoast.co.uk/help-and-support/delay-repay.

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Minister of State (Department for Transport)
6th Oct 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the case for providing regular bus connections for passengers to Oxenholme and Penrith during the forthcoming diversion of the West Coast Main Line.

Avanti West Coast (AWC) has announced rail replacement bus services will be in operation for passengers wishing to travel to and from Lancaster, Oxenholme and Penrith during the January engineering works. Further details on this will be available on the AWC website soon.

The Department regularly discusses with AWC the provision of services for passengers, including during engineering works. The Department has not undertaken an assessment of AWCs proposed bus connections.

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Minister of State (Department for Transport)
26th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what is their estimate of the percentages of total delays on the West Coast Main Line caused by (1) mechanical failure, (2) infrastructure failure, and (3) staff problems.

The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) publishes data on train delays, which can be publicly accessed through their data portal. The ORR also reports the causes of these delays by operator. Given that multiple operators provide services on the West Coast Main Line, it is not possible to isolate the causes of delays occurring specifically on this route.

However, data on the delay causes for Avanti West Coast, the primary operator of intercity services on the West Coast Main Line, for the last 12 months for which data is available is set out in the attached document.

(1) Mechanical failure - 18% of Avanti West Coast delay minutes were attributed to ‘Fleet’, either the TOC’s own or that of another operator.

(2) Infrastructure failure - 64% of Avanti West Coast delay minutes were attributed to ‘Network Rail’ including track, and network Management.

(3) Staff Problems - 8% of Avanti West Coast delay minutes were attributed to ‘Traincrew’ either the TOC’s own or that of another operator.

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Minister of State (Department for Transport)