Andrew Mitchell Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Andrew Mitchell

Information between 14th January 2026 - 24th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 184
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 182
20 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 127
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 185
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 326


Speeches
Andrew Mitchell speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Andrew Mitchell contributed 1 speech (74 words)
Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Commons Chamber
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Andrew Mitchell speeches from: Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
Andrew Mitchell contributed 1 speech (72 words)
Consideration of Lords amendments
Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Commons Chamber
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Andrew Mitchell speeches from: West Midlands Police
Andrew Mitchell contributed 1 speech (106 words)
Wednesday 14th January 2026 - Commons Chamber
Home Office
Andrew Mitchell speeches from: Iran
Andrew Mitchell contributed 1 speech (154 words)
Tuesday 13th January 2026 - Commons Chamber
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office


Written Answers
Diabetes: West Midlands
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield)
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to help tackle inequalities in (a) waiting times and (b) access to treatment for diabetes in the West Midlands.

Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Action is being taken across the West Midland integrated care boards (ICBs) to address inequalities in waiting times and access to treatment for diabetes

This action includes strengthening monitoring of data and to identify delays and variation, improving general practice (GP) engagement through Protected Learning Time sessions, streamlining referral pathways and supporting GPs to proactively identify and engage patients using improved data and low-literacy-friendly approaches

ICBs are also take actions to identify groups at greatest risk of poor outcomes who face barriers in accessing services. The aim of these actions is to deliver fairer waiting times, more consistent access to treatment, and equitable, high‑quality diabetes care for all communities.

Biodiversity and Pollution: Sutton Park
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield)
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 18 December 2025 to Question 98739 on Biodiversity and Pollution: Sutton Park, what steps her Department has taken since the decline in the condition of the park was first detected.

Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

Natural England (NE) and the Forestry Commission are working with Birmingham City Council (BCC) to review on-site management to address the decline in habitat condition. This includes: improved grazing; addressing scrub and bracken encroachment; management of invasive species; increased woodland thinning; and visitor management. NE also provided a detailed response to BCC’s 2025 consultation on its Sutton Park National Nature Reserve management plan, which identifies the key objectives and actions for managing the Park. NE is also discussing with BCC future funding support through agri-environment schemes and other sources.

NE is working with BCC and other neighbouring Local Planning Authorities to influence strategic development and transport plans to ensure housing needs are met while protecting the habitats of the Site of Special Scientific Interest from recreational pressure and air pollution.

NE and the Environment Agency continue to work with Severn Trent Water to address pollution risks from sewage infrastructure as part of the Water Industry Natural Environment Programme.

The recently published West Midlands Combined Authority Local Nature Recovery Strategy recognises the importance of Sutton Park, both for nature and for people. Actions identified in the Strategy, both within the Park and the wider area, will also support habitat recovery in the Park.

Biodiversity and Pollution: Sutton Park
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield)
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 18 December 2025 to Question 98739 on Biodiversity and Pollution: Sutton Park, on what date a decline in the condition of the park’s woodland and heathland habitats was first detected as part of Natural England's Site of Special Scientific Interest monitoring programme.

Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The woodland feature has been recorded as unfavourable since 2012, and was first identified as declining in the condition assessment published in March 2025. The heathland feature has been unfavourable since 2000, and was first identified as declining in September 2012. For both habitats, prior to their being recorded as unfavourable declining, they had previously been considered as unfavourable recovering. Unfavourable condition means that the habitat is not meeting its definition of favourable condition, and ‘recovering/declining’ indicates whether the management of on and off-site pressures will enable the habitat to become favourable.

Biodiversity and Pollution: Sutton Park
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield)
Tuesday 20th January 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 18 December 2025 to Question 98739 on Biodiversity and Pollution: Sutton Park, what official guidance has been issued by the Forestry Commission to Birmingham City Council on improving the management of Sutton Park.

Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Forestry Commission has approved a Felling Licence based on a management plan, which includes permissions for both thinning and conditional felling, alongside 4.99 hectares of heathland restoration.

This plan was approved for a 10-year period in September 2025 and will remain in effect until 14 September 2035.

The management plan sets out the following environmental objectives:

  • Manage woodlands towards the recovery of positive conditions on “Plantations on Ancient Woodlands” (PAWS) and “Site of Special Scientific Interest” (SSSI) through a mix of active planting and natural regeneration.
  • Promote good health and resilience of woodlands, diversifying age class and species composition using conventional and continuous cover forestry.
  • Manage priority habitat by cutting back undesirable scrub and regeneration.
  • Promote habitat connectivity by managing rides, footpaths, and edge woodlands.
  • Increase fauna and flora diversity through retention of veteran trees, standing deadwood, brash piles, and targeted thinning.

The management plan aims to ensure that Sutton Park’s woodlands are managed sustainably, enhancing biodiversity and supporting the long-term resilience of these important habitats. All of the above is in-line with the Government’s UK Forest Standard.

Pollution Control: Sutton Park
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield)
Wednesday 21st January 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 18 December 2025 to Question 98739 on Biodiversity and Pollution: Sutton Park, what recent discussions her Department has had with Severn Trent on how sewage infrastructure failures can be avoided in Sutton Park.

Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The most recent discussion Natural England has had with Severn Trent regarding how sewage infrastructure failures can be avoided in Sutton Park was a meeting on 13 November 2025 in conjunction with the Environment Agency. This discussion was part of ongoing discussions regarding Severn Trent's commitment within the Water Industry National Environment Programme (WINEP) to investigate the sources and impacts of water pollution at Sutton Park. The next meeting is due on 21 January 2026.

Natural England has noted that the number of serious incidents has reduced (from four in 2021 to two in 2025). Severn Trent has recently employed a new Ranger to support this work. However, there is still more work to reduce incidents. We will continue to work with Severn Trent alongside the Environment Agency to ensure Severn Trent delivers its commitments within the WINEP.




Andrew Mitchell mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

14 Jan 2026, 2:28 p.m. - House of Commons
" So Andrew Mitchell. >> Can I thank the Home Secretary who, like me as a local member of Parliament for her well-judged "
Rt Hon Sir Andrew Mitchell MP (Sutton Coldfield, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Waste Collection: Birmingham and the West Midlands
60 speeches (10,488 words)
Wednesday 21st January 2026 - Westminster Hall
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Mentions:
1: Wendy Morton (Con - Aldridge-Brownhills) Friend the Member for Sutton Coldfield (Sir Andrew Mitchell), who is sadly unable to be with us today - Link to Speech

Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
172 speeches (18,623 words)
Consideration of Lords amendments
Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Commons Chamber
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Mentions:
1: Stephen Doughty (LAB - Cardiff South and Penarth) Member for Sutton Coldfield (Sir Andrew Mitchell).The UK will never compromise on our national security - Link to Speech

Oral Answers to Questions
166 speeches (11,409 words)
Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Commons Chamber
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Mentions:
1: David Taylor (Lab - Hemel Hempstead) Member for Sutton Coldfield (Sir Andrew Mitchell), who I respect greatly, but in an era when we have - Link to Speech