Information between 7th January 2026 - 17th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Emma Lewell speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Emma Lewell contributed 2 speeches (102 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Emma Lewell speeches from: Digital ID
Emma Lewell contributed 1 speech (93 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
|
Emma Lewell speeches from: Gambling Harms: Children and Young People
Emma Lewell contributed 1 speech (10 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Emma Lewell speeches from: Business of the House
Emma Lewell contributed 1 speech (100 words) Tuesday 13th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Retail Trade: Business Rates
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether it is her policy that the business rates system should level the playing field between high street businesses and online retailers. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The amount of business rates paid on each property is based on the rateable value of the property, assessed by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA), and the multiplier values, which are set by the Government. Rateable values are re-assessed every three years. Revaluations ensure that the rateable values of properties (i.e. the tax base) remain in line with market changes, and that the tax rates adjust to reflect changes in the tax base.
At the Budget, the VOA announced updated property values from the 2026 revaluation. This revaluation is the first since Covid, which has led to significant increases in rateable values for some properties. To support with bill increases, at the Budget, the Government introduced a support package worth £4.3 billion over the next three years to protect ratepayers seeing their bills increase because of the revaluation. As a result, over half of ratepayers will see no bill increases, including 23% seeing their bills go down. Government support also means that most properties seeing increases will see them capped at 15% or less next year, or £800 for the smallest.
More broadly, the Government is delivering a long overdue reform to rebalance the business rates system and support the high street, as promised in our manifesto. The Government is doing this by introducing permanently lower tax rates for eligible retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) properties, including grassroots music venues, while ensuring that warehouses used by online giants will pay more. The new RHL tax rates replace the temporary RHL relief that has been winding down since Covid.
Unlike RHL relief, the new rates are permanent, giving businesses certainty and stability, and there will be no cap, meaning all qualifying properties on high streets across England will benefit.
Without this support, pubs would have faced a 45% increase in the total bills they pay next year. However, because of the support the Government has put in place, this has fallen to just 4%.
|
|
Public Houses: Business Rates
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the reasons why the recent business rates revaluation results in projected increases of up to 76 per cent in liabilities for pubs over the three-year revaluation period, after transition, compared with projected increases of around 16 per cent for distribution warehouses. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The amount of business rates paid on each property is based on the rateable value of the property, assessed by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA), and the multiplier values, which are set by the Government. Rateable values are re-assessed every three years. Revaluations ensure that the rateable values of properties (i.e. the tax base) remain in line with market changes, and that the tax rates adjust to reflect changes in the tax base.
At the Budget, the VOA announced updated property values from the 2026 revaluation. This revaluation is the first since Covid, which has led to significant increases in rateable values for some properties. To support with bill increases, at the Budget, the Government introduced a support package worth £4.3 billion over the next three years to protect ratepayers seeing their bills increase because of the revaluation. As a result, over half of ratepayers will see no bill increases, including 23% seeing their bills go down. Government support also means that most properties seeing increases will see them capped at 15% or less next year, or £800 for the smallest.
More broadly, the Government is delivering a long overdue reform to rebalance the business rates system and support the high street, as promised in our manifesto. The Government is doing this by introducing permanently lower tax rates for eligible retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) properties, including grassroots music venues, while ensuring that warehouses used by online giants will pay more. The new RHL tax rates replace the temporary RHL relief that has been winding down since Covid.
Unlike RHL relief, the new rates are permanent, giving businesses certainty and stability, and there will be no cap, meaning all qualifying properties on high streets across England will benefit.
Without this support, pubs would have faced a 45% increase in the total bills they pay next year. However, because of the support the Government has put in place, this has fallen to just 4%.
|
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 15th December Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Thursday 29th January 2026 28 signatures (Most recent: 29 Jan 2026) Tabled by: Rachael Maskell (Labour (Co-op) - York Central) That this House expresses its alarm at the growing number of higher education institutions deploying approaches which are having a negative impact on the pension schemes of academics and staff, including through fire and rehire proposals and other approaches tantamount to forcing workers onto worse contracts, terms and conditions; further … |
|
Tuesday 13th January Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Tuesday 13th January 2026 Centenary of the derailment of the Flying Scotsman 23 signatures (Most recent: 14 Jan 2026)Tabled by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) That this House notes that 10 May 2026 will mark the centenary of the inadvertent derailment of the Flying Scotsman at Cramlington during the General Strike of 1926; further notes that the intention of the miners involved was to disrupt the movement of a strike-breaking coal train and that, despite … |
|
Wednesday 7th January Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Monday 12th January 2026 Newborn bloodspot screening for spinal muscular atrophy 33 signatures (Most recent: 26 Jan 2026)Tabled by: Sorcha Eastwood (Alliance - Lagan Valley) That this House recognises the life-changing difference early diagnosis and treatment can make for babies with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA); notes that SMA is a rare but serious genetic condition which, if untreated, can cause severe disability or early death; further notes that gene therapies exist which are most effective … |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Gambling Harms: Children and Young People
33 speeches (13,766 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Regulation of Houses in Multiple Occupation
0 speeches (None words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Petitions Mentions: 1: None —[Presented by Emma Lewell, Official Report, 03 November 2025; Vol. 774, c. 728.] - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Monday 12th January 2026
Oral Evidence - Ministry of Defence Defence Committee Found: Members present: Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Chair); Mr Calvin Bailey; Alex Baker; Lincoln Jopp; Emma Lewell |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 20th January 2026 9:30 a.m. Defence Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes At 10:15am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Sir Ben Wallace, former Secretary of State for Defence At 11:00am: Oral evidence Rt Hon James Heappey, former Minister of State for the Armed Forces At 11:45am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Sir Grant Shapps, former Secretary of State for Defence View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026 10 a.m. Defence Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 10 a.m. Defence Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd March 2026 10 a.m. Defence Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 1:30 p.m. Defence Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Secretary of State for Defence At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon John Healey MP - Secretary of State at Ministry of Defence Jeremy Pocklington - Permanent Secretary at Ministry of Defence General Dame Sharon Nesmith - Vice Chief of the Defence Staff at Ministry of Defence View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 10 a.m. Defence Committee - Oral evidence Subject: One-off Session on the Future of Warfare At 10:30am: Oral evidence Sir Hew Strachan - Wardlaw Professor of International Relations at University of St Andrews Air Marshal (Retd) Edward Stringer - Senior Fellow at Policy Exchange Dr Keith Dear - CEO and Founder at Cassi View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
28 Jan 2026
Defence in the High North Defence Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 25 Mar 2026) The inquiry will examine the current and emerging threats in the region. It will ask what the UK’s defence and security interests are, and whether we have the correct strategies, capabilities and alliances to counter these threats, particularly from Russia. |