James Cartlidge Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for James Cartlidge

Information between 8th October 2026 - 18th October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 193
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 304
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 306
13 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over Extension) - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 179
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context
James Cartlidge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231


Written Answers
Social Services: Suffolk
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk)
Wednesday 14th October 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what discussions she has had with Suffolk County Council and care providers in Suffolk on the financial sustainability of community and adult social care services, in the context of increases in employer National Insurance contributions.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Baroness Casey has made clear that one of the core purposes of the Big Conversation on Care that she is leading is to hear from people, families, carers, charities, care providers, and other organisations with direct, real-life experience of the pressures facing the current social care system, so she can reflect those experiences in her recommendations for reform. That includes local authorities and care providers in different regions.

Social Services: Suffolk
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk)
Wednesday 14th October 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps she is taking to ensure that local authority commissioning rates in Suffolk take account of the impact of increases in employer National Insurance contributions on care providers.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Baroness Casey has made clear that one of the core purposes of the Big Conversation on Care that she is leading is to hear from people, families, carers, charities, care providers, and other organisations with direct, real-life experience of the pressures facing the current social care system, so she can reflect those experiences in her recommendations for reform. That includes local authorities and care providers in different regions.

Health Services: Suffolk
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk)
Wednesday 14th October 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of increases in employer National Insurance contributions on the availability and continuity of community support services in Suffolk.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Baroness Casey has made clear that one of the core purposes of the Big Conversation on Care that she is leading is to hear from people, families, carers, charities, care providers, and other organisations with direct, real-life experience of the pressures facing the current social care system, so she can reflect those experiences in her recommendations for reform. That includes local authorities and care providers in different regions.

Social Services: Suffolk
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk)
Wednesday 14th October 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what measures are available to support community and adult social care providers in Suffolk affected by increases in employer National Insurance contributions.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Baroness Casey has made clear that one of the core purposes of the Big Conversation on Care that she is leading is to hear from people, families, carers, charities, care providers, and other organisations with direct, real-life experience of the pressures facing the current social care system, so she can reflect those experiences in her recommendations for reform. That includes local authorities and care providers in different regions.

Social Services: Suffolk
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk)
Wednesday 14th October 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of increases in employer National Insurance contributions on community and adult social care providers in Suffolk.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Baroness Casey has made clear that one of the core purposes of the Big Conversation on Care that she is leading is to hear from people, families, carers, charities, care providers, and other organisations with direct, real-life experience of the pressures facing the current social care system, so she can reflect those experiences in her recommendations for reform. That includes local authorities and care providers in different regions.

Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk)
Wednesday 14th October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, how much her Department has spent on Local Government Reorganisation in Suffolk in financial years a) 2024/25 b) 2025/26 c) 2026/27.

Answered by Jim McMahon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

As set out by the Secretary of State in her oral statement of 7 September, the government has withdrawn the March 2026 decisions for Essex, Hampshire, Norfolk and Suffolk, and paused activity in a further 14 areas while a full review of the local government reorganisation programme is conducted. We recognise the need for clarity and will set out next steps as soon as possible. We also recognise that areas will have committed resources to reorganisation and ministers will consider this matter alongside the review.