Information between 8th September 2025 - 18th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context James Wild was Teller for the Noes and against the House Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context James Wild was Teller for the Ayes and against the House Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 292 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Child Poverty Strategy (Removal of Two Child Limit) - View Vote Context James Wild was Teller for the Noes and against the House Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 79 |
|
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 179 |
|
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 116 Noes - 333 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 324 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context James Wild voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 319 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
James Wild speeches from: Official Secrets Act Case: Witness Statements
James Wild contributed 1 speech (73 words) Thursday 16th October 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
James Wild speeches from: Jhoots Pharmacy
James Wild contributed 1 speech (102 words) Wednesday 15th October 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
James Wild speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
James Wild contributed 1 speech (89 words) Tuesday 14th October 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
James Wild speeches from: Employment Rights Bill
James Wild contributed 1 speech (91 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 15th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
|
James Wild speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
James Wild contributed 1 speech (91 words) Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Landfill Tax
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed reforms in the Consultation on Reform of Landfill Tax in England and Northern Ireland, published on 28 April 2025 on costs to the average UK infrastructure project. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The government consulted on proposals for reform of Landfill Tax on 28 April following a call for evidence in 2021. The consultation closed on 28 July, and the government is currently considering responses.
As part of the consultation, the Government has received a wide range of views from stakeholders, including representatives from the construction sector. Reducing the amount of waste material sent to landfill remains a key environmental objective, supporting the transition to a circular economy. The government recently published a 10-year infrastructure strategy that set out the government’s long-term plan for economic, housing and social infrastructure to drive growth.
The Government will continue to work across government and engage with stakeholders, including the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority, to assess the potential impacts on infrastructure projects. This approach will ensure that infrastructure delivery is supported while advancing circular economy objectives.
The government will respond to the consultation in due course. |
|
Landfill Tax
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed abolition of the lower rate of Landfill Tax, included in the Consultation on Reform of Landfill Tax in England and Northern Ireland, published on 28 April 2025 on costs to (a) households and (b) the construction industry. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The government consulted on proposals for reform of Landfill Tax on 28 April following a call for evidence in 2021. The consultation closed on 28 July, and the government is currently considering responses.
As part of the consultation, the Government has received a wide range of views from stakeholders, including representatives from the construction sector. Reducing the amount of waste material sent to landfill remains a key environmental objective, supporting the transition to a circular economy. The government recently published a 10-year infrastructure strategy that set out the government’s long-term plan for economic, housing and social infrastructure to drive growth.
The Government will continue to work across government and engage with stakeholders, including the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority, to assess the potential impacts on infrastructure projects. This approach will ensure that infrastructure delivery is supported while advancing circular economy objectives.
The government will respond to the consultation in due course. |
|
Landfill Tax
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed reforms in the Consultation on Reform of Landfill Tax in England and Northern Ireland, published on 28 April 2025 on UK infrastructure projects. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The government consulted on proposals for reform of Landfill Tax on 28 April following a call for evidence in 2021. The consultation closed on 28 July, and the government is currently considering responses.
As part of the consultation, the Government has received a wide range of views from stakeholders, including representatives from the construction sector. Reducing the amount of waste material sent to landfill remains a key environmental objective, supporting the transition to a circular economy. The government recently published a 10-year infrastructure strategy that set out the government’s long-term plan for economic, housing and social infrastructure to drive growth.
The Government will continue to work across government and engage with stakeholders, including the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority, to assess the potential impacts on infrastructure projects. This approach will ensure that infrastructure delivery is supported while advancing circular economy objectives.
The government will respond to the consultation in due course. |
|
Landfill Tax
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed reforms in the Consultation on Reform of Landfill Tax in England and Northern Ireland, published on 28 April 2025 on the Government’s housebuilding target. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The government consulted on proposals for reform of Landfill Tax on 28 April following a call for evidence in 2021. The consultation closed on 28 July, and the government is currently considering responses.
The government is committed to delivering 1.5 million homes over 5 years as set out in the Plan for Change. The government are working with the Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government to assess these impacts and is considering the potential impacts of proposed Landfill Tax reforms on housing delivery and government targets.
The government will respond to the consultation in due course. |
|
Holiday Activities and Food Programme: Finance
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Friday 3rd October 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department’s Spending Review settlement includes funding for a multi-year extension to the Holiday activities and food programme. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Through our Plan for Change, we are committed to giving every child the best start in life. On 28 August 2025 we confirmed over £600 million for the holiday activities and food (HAF) programme for the next three financial years (from 2026/27) which equates to just over £200 million each year. |
|
Angela Rayner
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the former Deputy Prime Minister has received a Ministerial severance payment. Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office On 21 July 2025, this Government announced reforms to Ministerial severance pay to ensure severance payments are proportionate and fair. These changes came into effect from 13 October. Before this, decisions as to whether a Minister accepted a severance payment were for the outgoing minister, in line with the practice of previous administrations.
Details of ministerial severance payments are published in the relevant department’s annual report and accounts.
|
|
Self-assessment: Fines
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will take steps to prevent people who owe no tax from being charged HMRC late-filing penalties. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The tax system contains obligations, set out in law, to ensure that HMRC can collect the correct tax to fund vital public services. HMRC is bound by law to apply penalties where customers do not meet these obligations. Penalties also help to reassure customers who comply with their obligations that HMRC are applying the rules fairly and consistently.
For Self Assessment (SA), HMRC requires the information from customers in their tax returns to determine whether they have Income Tax to pay. Even if a customer has no tax to pay, the information provided can ensure taxpayers receive the benefits to which they are entitled, such as Tax-Free Childcare. The current policy and legislation on SA penalties has been in place since 2011.
The government will soon introduce a new penalty regime for late filing of SA returns and late payment of income tax. As well as reducing the penalties a customer can accumulate for filing late, this will introduce a further safeguard so people will not receive a financial penalty for a single failure to file on time. The penalties will focus on people who repeatedly file late.
Where HMRC charges a penalty, a customer can appeal. HMRC will cancel any penalties where they accept that a taxpayer no longer needs to be in SA or has a reasonable excuse for not filing their return on time.
HMRC regularly reviews its guidance and communications, including making it easier for customers to explain why they were unable to file their return and to inform HMRC if they no longer need to be in SA.
HMRC has dedicated support in place for those facing personal difficulties and encourages anyone struggling to meet their obligations to contact them as soon as possible by phone or online.
|
|
Self-assessment: Fines
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of (a) abolishing and (b) capping the penalty for a single missed tax return for people earning less than £50,000. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The tax system contains obligations, set out in law, to ensure that HMRC can collect the correct tax to fund vital public services. HMRC is bound by law to apply penalties where customers do not meet these obligations. Penalties also help to reassure customers who comply with their obligations that HMRC are applying the rules fairly and consistently.
For Self Assessment (SA), HMRC requires the information from customers in their tax returns to determine whether they have Income Tax to pay. Even if a customer has no tax to pay, the information provided can ensure taxpayers receive the benefits to which they are entitled, such as Tax-Free Childcare. The current policy and legislation on SA penalties has been in place since 2011.
The government will soon introduce a new penalty regime for late filing of SA returns and late payment of income tax. As well as reducing the penalties a customer can accumulate for filing late, this will introduce a further safeguard so people will not receive a financial penalty for a single failure to file on time. The penalties will focus on people who repeatedly file late.
Where HMRC charges a penalty, a customer can appeal. HMRC will cancel any penalties where they accept that a taxpayer no longer needs to be in SA or has a reasonable excuse for not filing their return on time.
HMRC regularly reviews its guidance and communications, including making it easier for customers to explain why they were unable to file their return and to inform HMRC if they no longer need to be in SA.
HMRC has dedicated support in place for those facing personal difficulties and encourages anyone struggling to meet their obligations to contact them as soon as possible by phone or online.
|
|
Self-assessment: Fines
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of reviewing HMRC late-filing penalties. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The tax system contains obligations, set out in law, to ensure that HMRC can collect the correct tax to fund vital public services. HMRC is bound by law to apply penalties where customers do not meet these obligations. Penalties also help to reassure customers who comply with their obligations that HMRC are applying the rules fairly and consistently.
For Self Assessment (SA), HMRC requires the information from customers in their tax returns to determine whether they have Income Tax to pay. Even if a customer has no tax to pay, the information provided can ensure taxpayers receive the benefits to which they are entitled, such as Tax-Free Childcare. The current policy and legislation on SA penalties has been in place since 2011.
The government will soon introduce a new penalty regime for late filing of SA returns and late payment of income tax. As well as reducing the penalties a customer can accumulate for filing late, this will introduce a further safeguard so people will not receive a financial penalty for a single failure to file on time. The penalties will focus on people who repeatedly file late.
Where HMRC charges a penalty, a customer can appeal. HMRC will cancel any penalties where they accept that a taxpayer no longer needs to be in SA or has a reasonable excuse for not filing their return on time.
HMRC regularly reviews its guidance and communications, including making it easier for customers to explain why they were unable to file their return and to inform HMRC if they no longer need to be in SA.
HMRC has dedicated support in place for those facing personal difficulties and encourages anyone struggling to meet their obligations to contact them as soon as possible by phone or online.
|
|
Retail Trade: Business Rates
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed higher business rates multiplier on employment in the retail sector. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government is creating a fairer business rates system that protects the high street, supports investment, and is fit for the 21st century.
As set out at Autumn Budget 2024, the Government will introduce permanently lower tax rates for retail, hospitality, and leisure (RHL) properties with ratable values (RVs) below £500,000 from 2026-27. This permanent tax cut will ensure they benefit from much-needed certainty and support.
This tax cut must be sustainably funded, and so the Government will introduce a higher rate on the most valuable properties in 2026/27 - those with RVs of £500,000 and above. These represent less than one per cent of all properties, but cover the majority of large distribution warehouses, including those used by online giants.
The final design, including the rates, for the new business rates multipliers will be announced at Budget 2025, so that the Government can factor the revaluation outcomes and broader economic and fiscal context into decision-making. When the new multipliers are set, HM Treasury intends to publish analysis of the effects of the new multiplier arrangements. |
|
Solar Power: Norfolk
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Friday 17th October 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what discussions his Department has had with Island Green Power on the proposed plans for The Droves Solar Farm; and if he will publish (a) the minutes and (b) the agenda of any such meetings. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Details of Ministers' and Permanent Secretaries' meetings with external individuals and organisations are published quarterly in arrears on GOV.UK. |
|
Hospitals: Concrete
Asked by: James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk) Friday 17th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 29 January 2025 to Question 25328 on the Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn, whether he has received a copy of the report; and, with reference to his Department policy paper entitled New Hospital Programme; plan for implementation, published on 20 January 2025, what his planned timetable is for the publication of the site-by-site report of the RAAC hospitals. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The safety of staff and patients at the seven predominantly reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) hospitals remains our utmost priority. The completion date for the report has been extended to ensure a detailed understanding of the complex data and issues considered, including the RAAC condition, planned and current mitigations, and the remaining expected life of the hospital sites. By building a better understanding, we can support each scheme to move forward more effectively. We expect the report will be complete this year. A decision has not yet been taken regarding the publication of the report. In the interim, the seven predominantly RAAC hospitals continue their programme of RAAC mitigation works and the plans for the replacement hospitals continue at pace. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
14 Oct 2025, 12:03 p.m. - House of Commons "problem, not to bury our heads in the sand and not deliver the investment that's necessary. >> James Wild, thank you very much. Mr Speaker. " Michael Shanks MP, Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) (Rutherglen, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
15 Oct 2025, 1:22 p.m. - House of Commons " James Wild thank you. " James Wild MP (North West Norfolk, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
16 Oct 2025, 11:03 a.m. - House of Commons "afraid that isn't. I'm afraid that isn't that I'm not across the specific of that in my brief. I'll come back to. >> One James Wild. " James Wild MP (North West Norfolk, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Oral Answers to Questions
151 speeches (10,119 words) Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Rachel Reeves (Lab - Leeds West and Pudsey) Member for North West Norfolk (James Wild) says that that is spending. - Link to Speech |