Samantha Niblett Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Samantha Niblett

Information between 21st November 2025 - 1st December 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 309
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 314 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 321
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320


Written Answers
Visas: Married People
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Wednesday 26th November 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to ensure that spousal visa applications are processed in line with equality standards, especially where one party has (a) a learning disability and (b) Down's Syndrome.

Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)

The partner route under Appendix FM includes different requirements for those who have a disability in recognition of the Home Office’s equality obligations. For example, where the sponsor is claiming certain health disability allowances the family must meet the adequate maintenance test rather than the minimum income requirement and applicants are exempt from meeting English language requirements if they have a disability which prevents them learning English.

All applications are considered on a case-by-case basis and where there are vulnerabilities, the caseworker will take this into consideration. Equality Impact Assessments are kept under review and updated as necessary.

Internet: Outages
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 24th November 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Treasury has estimated the economic cost of outages on hyperscale cloud providers, and whether such risks are factored into national digital resilience planning.

Answered by James Murray - Chief Secretary to the Treasury

The Government monitors systemic risks to UK critical national infrastructure, including resilience measures and contingency planning, including cloud providers.

The Government recognises the importance of robust protections for the services essential to our society and economy. That is why we introduced the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill on 12 November. The Bill will make sure more types of essential and digital services adhere to robust cyber security practices.

Digital Service Providers: Competition
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 24th November 2025

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what actions she will take to address restrictive software licensing practices by dominant cloud providers, as identified by the CMA, to ensure fair competition in the cloud services market.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Government is committed to supporting a competitive and innovative digital economy. This is why we prioritised the commencement of the Competition and Markets Authority’s (the CMA) new powers in digital markets. The CMA is independent of Government, and any decisions on which markets it investigates is for their Board.

Digital Service Providers
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 24th November 2025

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps the Government is taking to ensure greater competition, interoperability, and diversity in the UK cloud market, in light of successive large-scale outages from Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

In July, the Competition and Markets Authority (the CMA) recommended their board prioritise a future Strategic Market Status investigation into competition in the cloud market. The CMA is independent of Government and any decisions on which markets it investigates is for their Board.

Digital Service Providers
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 24th November 2025

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that the Competition and Markets Authority accelerates the Digital Markets Unit strategic market status designation process for cloud services.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Competition and Markets Authority (the CMA) has completed 3 Strategic Market Status investigations this year. The CMA is independent of the Government and decisions on which markets to investigate is for their Board. The CMA has published guidance on its website on how it will prioritise Strategic Market Status designations.

Digital Service Providers
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 24th November 2025

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the systemic risks posed to the UK economy and critical services by reliance on two dominant hyperscale cloud providers, following recent outages on Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) continues to monitor systemic risks to UK critical national infrastructure from reliance on cloud providers, including resilience measures and contingency planning following recent service outages. DSIT works closely with each cloud provider during and after any incident to ensure improved resilience and lessons learnt are shared across Government. For example, following earlier global digital resilience incidents, we are working to strengthen our capability to coordinate this kind of incident across Government.

Government recommends that public sector organisations adopt a multi-region approach, in which they make controlled, considered use of regions in a way which is compatible with UK law. This helps improve resilience by removing the reliance on any one region.

DSIT will publish the Government Cyber Action Plan this Winter, which sets out a clear approach for Government and the public sector to manage cyber security and resilience incidents impacting Government services.

Government also recognises the importance of robust protections for the services essential to our society and economy – that is why we introduced the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill on 12 November.

Recreation Spaces
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Thursday 27th November 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of parks and green spaces on communities.

Answered by Miatta Fahnbulleh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Parks and urban green spaces are important for community cohesion, biodiversity, climate change mitigation, and civic pride.

Responsibility for funding, managing and maintaining them lies mainly with local authorities. The government is committed to supporting Local Authorities in developing best practice to look after parks and green spaces.

The cornerstone of our support for communities is the government’s Pride in Place Programme, providing up to £5 billion funding and support over 10 years to 244 places. This flagship offer will help build strong, resilient and integrated communities in areas that experience the most entrenched social and economic challenges. This includes opportunities for communities to invest in their local parks and green spaces.

We are also committed to maintaining the quality of parks and green spaces through the MHCLG-owned Green Flag Award, which sets the national quality standard. The scheme has helped to transform thousands of parks and green spaces across the country.

The government's statutory guidance on local government reorganisation requires that unitary structures must prioritise the delivery of high quality and sustainable public services to citizens and that unitary structures should enable stronger community engagement and deliver genuine opportunity for neighbourhood empowerment, including parks and green spaces.

The government’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is also clear that planning policies should set out an overall strategy for the pattern, scale and design quality of places and make sufficient provision for the conservation and enhancement of the natural, built and historic environment, including green infrastructure.

Recreation Spaces
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Thursday 27th November 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps he is taking to protect green spaces and parks as part of the local government review.

Answered by Miatta Fahnbulleh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Parks and urban green spaces are important for community cohesion, biodiversity, climate change mitigation, and civic pride.

Responsibility for funding, managing and maintaining them lies mainly with local authorities. The government is committed to supporting Local Authorities in developing best practice to look after parks and green spaces.

The cornerstone of our support for communities is the government’s Pride in Place Programme, providing up to £5 billion funding and support over 10 years to 244 places. This flagship offer will help build strong, resilient and integrated communities in areas that experience the most entrenched social and economic challenges. This includes opportunities for communities to invest in their local parks and green spaces.

We are also committed to maintaining the quality of parks and green spaces through the MHCLG-owned Green Flag Award, which sets the national quality standard. The scheme has helped to transform thousands of parks and green spaces across the country.

The government's statutory guidance on local government reorganisation requires that unitary structures must prioritise the delivery of high quality and sustainable public services to citizens and that unitary structures should enable stronger community engagement and deliver genuine opportunity for neighbourhood empowerment, including parks and green spaces.

The government’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is also clear that planning policies should set out an overall strategy for the pattern, scale and design quality of places and make sufficient provision for the conservation and enhancement of the natural, built and historic environment, including green infrastructure.



Early Day Motions Signed
Thursday 4th December
Samantha Niblett signed this EDM on Tuesday 9th December 2025

Thanking postal workers

72 signatures (Most recent: 15 Dec 2025)
Tabled by: Lee Barron (Labour - Corby and East Northamptonshire)
That this House notes that a majority of Britons, 54 percent, intend to send their Christmas gifts this year using Royal Mail, an increase from 30 percent in 2024; recognises the vital role Royal Mail continues to play in connecting families and communities; and expresses its sincere thanks to every …



Samantha Niblett - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 9 a.m.
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Innovation showcase
At 9:30am: Oral evidence
Dr Rebecca Chubb - Deputy Clinical Director at North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare Trust
Joe McCrea - Associate Director of Communications at North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare Trust
At 9:45am: Oral evidence
Dr Manjari Chandran-Ramesh - Partner at Amadeus Capital Partners
Jessica Wade - Associate Professor at Imperial College London
At 10:30am: Oral evidence
Jonathan Legh-Smith - Executive Director at UKQuantum
Duncan Jones - General Manager at Quantinuum
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 9 a.m.
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Work of the Secretary of State for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
At 9:45am: Oral evidence
Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP - Secretary of State at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Emran Mian - Permanent Secretary at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 9th December 2025 9 a.m.
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Digital inclusion and telecoms
At 9:30am: Oral evidence
Paul Hollingshead - Lead, UK & Europe at Saronic
At 9:45am: Oral evidence
The Baroness Lloyd of Effra CBE - Minister for Digital Economy at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Kevin Adams - Interim Director Digital Infrastructure at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Jenny Hall - Director Digital and Data Policy at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, re: Update on the Roadmap for Modern Digital Government, 19 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Science, Innovation, Research and Nuclear, re: UKRI R&D Allocations and Innovation for Growth Summit, 24 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister of State for Policing and Crime, re; Animals in science, 27 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Chair to Open Rights Group, re: Information Commissioner’s performance, 26 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Science, Innovation, Research and Nuclear, re: Updated UKRI Framework Document, 24 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Chair to Minister for Science, Innovation, Research and Nuclear, re: UKRI R&D allocations, 26 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister of State for AI and Online Safety, re: New measures harnessing AI, 21 December 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister of State for AI and Online Safety, re: The Online Safety Act 2023 (fees) (threshold figure) Regulations 2025, 19 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Digital Government and Data, re: Data Act’s Digital Verification Services powers, 20 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Thursday 4th December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Science, Innovation, Research and Nuclear, re: UKRI R&D allocations and Innovation for Growth Summit, 2 December 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Thursday 4th December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister of State for Digital Government and Data, re: Data (Use and Access) Act Commencement Update, 2 December 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Thursday 4th December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister of State for Digital Government and Data, re: Digital centre of government inquiry – follow up, 2 December 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare Trust, and North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare Trust

Innovation showcase - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - Imperial College London, and Amadeus Capital Partners

Science diplomacy - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - UKQuantum, and Quantinuum

Science diplomacy - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 10th December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Chief Executive of UK Space Agency, re: UK’s negotiation at the ESA Council of Ministers, 28 November 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 10th December 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Chair to Minister for AI and Online Safety, re: Delivering AI Growth Zones, 01 December 2025

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 10th December 2025
Written Evidence - Breast Cancer Now
LSI0058 - Life sciences investment

Life sciences investment - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 10th December 2025
Written Evidence - University of Liverpool
APD0001 - Asteroids and planetary defence

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Tuesday 9th December 2025
Oral Evidence - Saronic

Innovation showcase - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Tuesday 9th December 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
6 Nov 2025
The science and regulation of hair and beauty products and treatments
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Hair and beauty products (chemicals applied to the hair or body for cosmetic purposes) and treatments (cosmetic procedures typically performed by specialists) can cause harm to consumers if they contain unregulated ingredients or if they are improperly administered.  The inquiry will respond to recent research which has led to concerns about the current scientific evidence base and regulation for these products, as well as the required training and qualifications of specialists performing treatments.  The inquiry will also investigate the growing concern that certain products that are commonly used by marginalised groups, such as creams to ‘relax’ afro-type hair and synthetic hair, can contain harmful chemicals.

  • How do UK regulators assess scientific evidence to ensure the safety of beauty products and treatments? Are existing processes effective, including for individuals with diverse hair and skin types? 
  • Is there sufficient transparency in how scientific evidence is used in regulatory decisions for hair and beauty products to ensure public trust? 
  • How well are consumers informed about the potential harms of beauty products and treatments? How can this be improved? 
  • For beauty products and treatments where the evidence suggests there may be risks, what studies need to take place to better understand potential harms for users, including in the longer term? 
  • How effective are existing training and qualifications requirements for individuals who administer beauty treatments in minimising harm to their recipients? How could this be improved?
  • What changes (regulatory, legal or otherwise) could ensure that consumers are better protected from and aware of the risks of potentially harmful beauty products and treatments?

24 Nov 2025
Data security across government
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

On 15 July 2025 the Defence Secretary told the House of Commons about a large-scale data breach that had taken place in 2022, when a Ministry of Defence official emailed a spreadsheet to an external contact, unaware that it contained details relating to 18,700 Afghan nationals applying for relocation.

In the wake of this, and other serious public sector data breaches, the committee chair wrote to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, and the Information Commissioner, to find out more about data hygiene and data management practices across government. This led to the publication in August 2025 of an Information Security Review which had been undertaken by the Cabinet Office in 2023 but not published. In August and then October 2025 the government announced further details of their intended response to the Afghan data breach - and others like it – and the subsequent review. 

On 21 October 2025 the committee questioned the Information Commissioner about his office's response to the February 2022 breach and wider learnings for government information and data security. In February 2026, the committee will question the Security Minister and Minister for Digital Government and Data on how the government has responded to the breach, and implemented the recommendations made in the Information Security Review.