Samantha Niblett Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Samantha Niblett

Information between 16th April 2026 - 26th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 289 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 158
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 159
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 61
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 156
22 Apr 2026 - Draft Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 Draft Immigration and Asylum (Provision of Accommodation to Failed Asylum-Seekers) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 1
22 Apr 2026 - Draft Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 Draft Immigration and Asylum (Provision of Accommodation to Failed Asylum-Seekers) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 2


Speeches
Samantha Niblett speeches from: Business of the House
Samantha Niblett contributed 1 speech (120 words)
Thursday 16th April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Leader of the House
Samantha Niblett speeches from: Women’s Health Strategy
Samantha Niblett contributed 1 speech (123 words)
Thursday 16th April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care
Samantha Niblett speeches from: Neuroscience and Digital Childhoods
Samantha Niblett contributed 1 speech (192 words)
Thursday 16th April 2026 - Westminster Hall
Samantha Niblett speeches from: NHS Federated Data Platform
Samantha Niblett contributed 1 speech (381 words)
Thursday 16th April 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Mobile Phones: Aerials
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the concentration of ownership of UK mobile towers among wireless infrastructure providers; and what assessment she has made of the implications of this market structure for competition and mobile coverage.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Government continually monitors developments across the mobile market to understand how they may shape investment in comprehensive, high-quality mobile connectivity that is secure and affordable for consumers and business.

On 10 February, the Government published the Mobile Market Review call for evidence, inviting stakeholders to provide detailed evidence on the technological, structural and financial developments across the mobile ecosystem and how they impact investment, competition and consumer outcomes, and on what further actions the Government could take to support these objectives.

The call for evidence closes on 5 May. The Government encourages all relevant stakeholders to engage with the process and provide robust evidence to help inform future policy development.

Telecommunications: Infrastructure
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of 2017 Electronic Communications Code reforms on relationships between telecoms operators and site providers; and whether she has made an estimate of the number of site providers who have declined to renew mast agreements as a result.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Government wants Code agreements to be negotiated collaboratively; and the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022 made changes to the Code intended to support this.

The Department has not undertaken comprehensive monitoring of the number of active Code agreements following the 2017 reforms.

However, landowners can terminate agreements governed by the Electronic Communications Code for a number of reasons, including if they intend to redevelop the land. Therefore, any data on the number of terminated agreements alone would not be indicative of the effectiveness of the 2017 reforms.

It should also be noted that 4G geographic coverage from all four operators has risen from 40% in 2016 to 81% in 2025 and 5G premises (outdoor) coverage has reached 47% from all four operators in 2025.

The 2022 reforms also introduced a requirement for operators to inform landowners of the availability of alternative dispute resolution and to consider using it before issuing legal proceedings. Section 70 of the Act, which will be implemented in due course, will introduce a new process for the handling of complaints about the conduct of operators under the Electronic Communications Code.

Mobile Phones: Aerials
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of trends in the level of ownership of UK mobile towers among wireless infrastructure providers; and what assessment she has made of the potential impact of that market structure on competition, pricing and mobile coverage.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The government continually monitors developments across the market to understand how they may impact investment in comprehensive, high-quality mobile connectivity that is secure and affordable for consumers and business.

On 10 February, the Government published the Mobile Market Review call for evidence, inviting stakeholders to provide detailed evidence on how technological, structural and financial developments across the mobile ecosystem may impact investment, competition and consumer outcomes, and on what further actions Government could take to support these objectives.

The call for evidence closes on 5 May, and the Government encourages all relevant stakeholders to engage with the process to help inform future policy development.

Motability: Rural Areas
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of mileage restrictions applied to Motability scheme vehicles on disabled people and families living in semi‑rural and rural areas, particularly those reliant on their vehicle to travel longer distances to work, education settings and schools, healthcare appointments and other essential services; and what steps his Department is taking to ensure that such restrictions do not create geographic inequality for disabled people.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Responsibility for the terms and administration of the Scheme sits with Motability Foundation and its Board of Governors.

The changes to the leasing package were announced on 26 March and include reducing the mileage allowance from 20,000 per year to 10,000 per year. Changes only apply to new leases and there are no changes to the mileage allowance of existing leases. Motability Foundation have advised that approximately 75% of customers on the Scheme already use less miles than the proposed new mileage allowance. They have acknowledged that there will be an impact on some customers and are considering if the impact can be mitigated in some limited circumstances.

Police: Pay
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she plans to oppose proposed changes submitted to the Police Remuneration Review Body on reducing compensation for cancelled rest days and altering re-roster arrangements for police officers.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Police Remuneration Review Body (PRRB) makes recommendations to the Government on the appropriate level of pay and allowances for police officers, including payments for cancelled rest days. The PRRB gathers and invites parties to submit evidence to inform their decisions. The Government will give very careful consideration to any recommendations made by the PRRB.

The Government expects any changes to police pay and conditions to take into account the welfare, morale and retention of officers, alongside the operational needs of policing. We are clear that officer wellbeing must remain a central consideration in any changes.

More widely, this Government remains firmly committed to supporting the wellbeing of police officers and staff through the Police Covenant. This includes ongoing work to ensure that officers have access to appropriate support in key areas such as mental health, physical protection, and support for their families.

Police: Pay
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of proposals by the National Police Chiefs’ Council to change compensation arrangements for cancelled police rest days on officer welfare, morale and retention.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Police Remuneration Review Body (PRRB) makes recommendations to the Government on the appropriate level of pay and allowances for police officers, including payments for cancelled rest days. The PRRB gathers and invites parties to submit evidence to inform their decisions. The Government will give very careful consideration to any recommendations made by the PRRB.

The Government expects any changes to police pay and conditions to take into account the welfare, morale and retention of officers, alongside the operational needs of policing. We are clear that officer wellbeing must remain a central consideration in any changes.

More widely, this Government remains firmly committed to supporting the wellbeing of police officers and staff through the Police Covenant. This includes ongoing work to ensure that officers have access to appropriate support in key areas such as mental health, physical protection, and support for their families.

Minimum Wage: National Insurance Contributions
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, following the announcement in the Budget on 30th October 2025 and its requirement for both the National Minimum Wage and employer National Insurance contributions to be increased, whether assurances will be given to General Practices nationally that they will be reimbursed for these increased costs.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Funding for general practice (GP) is agreed annually through consultation on the GP Contract, which considers wider cost pressures facing practices as part of the overall settlement. These funding decisions are informed by a range of factors, including independent recommendations from the Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration, where relevant, as well as affordability considerations. However, the GP Contract does not provide for automatic reimbursement of individual cost increases, including changes to National Insurance contributions or the National Minimum Wage.

In this context, we have uplifted the GP Contract by £601 million for 2026/27. This builds on last year’s £1.1 billion of investment, taking the two-year increase to £1.7 billion, or 13.8% in cash terms and 8.1% in real terms. Through consultation with stakeholders, we set these uplifts and changes to the contract with regard to the pressures faced by businesses. This includes the costs associated with the Government’s agreement to implement review body recommendations, including a 3.5% pay rise for GPs.

Urinary Tract Infections: Vaccination
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps are required for vaccines for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections to obtain regulatory approval including an indicative timeline for licensing.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

For any new medicine to be introduced to the United Kingdom market an application to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is required. The MHRA is ready to support companies that are looking to introduce new medicines to the United Kingdom market, offering regulatory and scientific advice to help companies at any stage of the product development process. The MHRA has established procedures in place to review any applications we receive to evaluate the benefit risk of a product in relation to its quality, safety, and efficacy. The exact timeframe will depend on the type of submission the company makes.

Heart Diseases: Health Services
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether NHS England plans to update its clinical guidance on long‑term support for cardiac arrest survivors, including access to free medication.

Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

NHS England is focused on improving long‑term, holistic follow‑up and rehabilitation after cardiac arrest. In December 2024, to support local systems to commission high quality cardiac rehabilitation, NHS England published Commissioning standards for cardiac rehabilitation, which is available at the following link:

https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/commissioning-standards-for-cardiovascular-rehabilitation/

Access to prescribed medicines is determined through existing medicines and prescribing policy.

Heart Diseases: Prescriptions
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Friday 24th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent discussions his Department has had with NHS England on expanding medical exemption criteria to include cardiac arrest survivors dependent on long‑term rhythm‑stabilising medication.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

There are no current plans to add cardiac arrest to the list of medical conditions that entitle someone to apply for a medical exemption certificate, and no discussions have been held with NHS England on this matter.

People who require long-term heart medication may be eligible for exemption from National Health Service prescription charges for another reason. Eligibility depends on the patient’s age, whether they are in qualifying full-time education, whether they are pregnant or have recently given birth, whether they have a qualifying medical condition, and whether they are in receipt of certain benefits or a war pension.

Additionally, people on a low income can seek help under the NHS Low Income Scheme, and people who have to pay NHS prescription charges and need many prescription items could save money with a prescription prepayment certificate.

Heart Diseases: Prescriptions
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Friday 24th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his department plans to review prescription charge exemptions for people who require lifelong medication following a cardiac arrest.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

There are no current plans to add cardiac arrest to the list of medical conditions that entitle someone to apply for a medical exemption certificate, and no discussions have been held with NHS England on this matter.

People who require long-term heart medication may be eligible for exemption from National Health Service prescription charges for another reason. Eligibility depends on the patient’s age, whether they are in qualifying full-time education, whether they are pregnant or have recently given birth, whether they have a qualifying medical condition, and whether they are in receipt of certain benefits or a war pension.

Additionally, people on a low income can seek help under the NHS Low Income Scheme, and people who have to pay NHS prescription charges and need many prescription items could save money with a prescription prepayment certificate.

Heart Diseases: Prescriptions
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Friday 24th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to ensure that people access long‑term heart medication given the level of prescription charges.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

There are no current plans to add cardiac arrest to the list of medical conditions that entitle someone to apply for a medical exemption certificate, and no discussions have been held with NHS England on this matter.

People who require long-term heart medication may be eligible for exemption from National Health Service prescription charges for another reason. Eligibility depends on the patient’s age, whether they are in qualifying full-time education, whether they are pregnant or have recently given birth, whether they have a qualifying medical condition, and whether they are in receipt of certain benefits or a war pension.

Additionally, people on a low income can seek help under the NHS Low Income Scheme, and people who have to pay NHS prescription charges and need many prescription items could save money with a prescription prepayment certificate.

British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme: Agriculture and Food
Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of expanding the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme to include (a) farmers and (b) food production.

Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

Eligibility for the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme is informed by the Government’s Industrial Strategy and by the recent consultation on scheme eligibility.

Decisions on eligibility have been taken to drive economic growth in line with the Industrial Strategy, by targeting manufacturing frontier industries within its growth sectors, as well as manufacturing foundational industries that provide important inputs to them, where electricity costs most directly affect international competitiveness.

Farming and food production are therefore not within the scope of the Scheme.



Early Day Motions Signed
Monday 13th April
Samantha Niblett signed this EDM on Monday 20th April 2026

100th anniversary of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II

101 signatures (Most recent: 21 Apr 2026)
Tabled by: Adam Jogee (Labour - Newcastle-under-Lyme)
That this House notes, with affection and respect, the 100th anniversary, on 21 April 2026 of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II; reflects on the sense of loss that people throughout the United Kingdom, the realms, territories and Commonwealth still feel following Her late Majesty’s death on …



Samantha Niblett mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Neuroscience and Digital Childhoods
12 speeches (2,432 words)
Thursday 16th April 2026 - Westminster Hall

Mentions:
1: Chi Onwurah (Lab - Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West) Friend the Member for South Derbyshire (Samantha Niblett) about Government action. - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Thursday 23rd April 2026
Report - 4th Report - Pre-appointment hearing for the Chair of UK Research and Innovation

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee

Found: Allison Gardner (Labour; Stoke-on-Trent South) Kit Malthouse (Conservative; North West Hampshire) Samantha Niblett

Wednesday 15th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Ola Labib, Rachael Healy, and Get Off Live Comedy

Experiences of women in live comedy - Women and Equalities Committee

Found: I also want to pay tribute to a couple of colleagues, Simon Opher MP and Samantha Niblett MP, who have




Samantha Niblett - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 29th April 2026 9 a.m.
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Science, Innovation, Research and Nuclear and UKRI CEO, re: Further follow-ups from letter sent on 26 March from Chair in relation to scientific research funding, 9 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - L’Oréal UKI
HBT0014 - The science and regulation of hair and beauty products and treatments

The science and regulation of hair and beauty products and treatments - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab)
SDY0061 - Science diplomacy

Science diplomacy - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Digital Economy, re: Telecoms Modernisation, 24 March 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Digital Government and Data, re: Roadmap for modern digital government 2025-2030 update, 1 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Digital Economy, re: Digital Inclusion Action Plan – ‘One Year On’ progress report, 24 March 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Science, Research and Innovation and Minister for Health Innovation and Safety, re: UK-US Arrangement on Pharmaceuticals Pricing and Tariffs, 2 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Tim Gershon, Department of physics, University of Warwick, re: Scientific research funding and Particle Physics, Astronomy and Nuclear Physics (PPAN), 1 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Dr William Barter, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, re: Drayson Partitions, 31 March 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Dr Paula Collins, CERN, re: Scientific research funding, 28 March 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Co-signatures, re: Impact of STFC funding delays and cuts on early-career researchers in Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Nuclear Physics, 18 March 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from, Dr Simon J. Williams, Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, University of Durham, re: Briefing: STFC Astronomy Grants - The Numbers, 18 March 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Science, Innovation and Nuclear and Minister for the Indo-Pacific, re: Follow-ups from 17 March oral evidence session on Science diplomacy, 9 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Professor Jon Butterworth, Professor Catherine Heymans and Dr Simon Williams, re: Follow-ups from 4 March oral evidence session on Scientific research funding, 9 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Digital Economy, re: UK investment in OneWeb, 16 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Digital Economy, re: Radiofrequency jammers, 10 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Professor Mark Lancaster, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, re: Comments on Lord Vallance and Sir Ian Chapman written response dated 19 March in relation to scientific research funding, 2 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Dr Simon Williams, Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, University of Durham, re: Update based on Lord Vallance and Sir Ian Chapman written response dated 19 March in relation to scientific research funding, 9 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Oral Evidence - UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Thursday 23rd April 2026
Report - 4th Report - Pre-appointment hearing for the Chair of UK Research and Innovation

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Digital Government and Data, re: Code of practice on AI and automated decision-making, 21 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister for Digital Economy, re: Strategic priorities for telecommunications, the management of radio spectrum and postal services, 27 April 2026

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
16 Apr 2026
Low-energy computing
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 14 May 2026)


AI model sizes and data volumes are growing significantly. At the same time, areas like quantum computing and protein synthesis also require increasing amounts of computational power.

This trend is exerting increasing demands on energy supplies, and it has been suggested that new innovations in silicon photonics and neuromorphic computing could offer a solution. 

The Science, Innovation and Technology committee is examining how realistic a possibility this is, when breakthroughs might be expected to take place and what the government is doing to support research and innovation activity in this area.

This inquiry has been launched following pitches made to the committee as part of its Under the Microscope initiative.