Mentions:
1: Toby Perkins (Lab - Chesterfield) There has been no trend of improvement on tree planting between 2018 and 2023. - Speech Link
2: Robbie Moore (Con - Keighley) There is no better champion than my hon. Friend on the challenge of coastal erosion. - Speech Link
3: Mark Spencer (Con - Sherwood) Under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, groomers must protect dogs under their control from harm and provide - Speech Link
4: Duncan Baker (Con - North Norfolk) that, as the Minister says, the Animal Welfare Act provides some framework in relation to intentional harm - Speech Link
5: Rebecca Pow (Con - Taunton Deane) I must first commend the national forest for all that it has achieved. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Andrea Leadsom (Con - South Northamptonshire) First, I pay tribute to my hon. - Speech Link
2: Preet Kaur Gill (LAB - Birmingham, Edgbaston) I see no issue with that.I do, however, have questions about implementation. - Speech Link
3: Caroline Johnson (Con - Sleaford and North Hykeham) I say, first, that I fully support this Bill and what it intends to do. - Speech Link
4: Rachael Maskell (LAB - York Central) However, we do not yet know the extent of the harm that can be done by vaping, so we could well be back - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: David Davis (Con - Haltemprice and Howden) we are trying to do. - Speech Link
2: David Davis (Con - Haltemprice and Howden) we are trying to do. - Speech Link
3: Mike Freer (Con - Finchley and Golders Green) Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill mentioned, we do not have a first amendment, so there is a nervousness - Speech Link
4: David Davis (Con - Haltemprice and Howden) This is not a first amendment clause at all. - Speech Link
5: Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) to harm, distress, expense, inconvenience or harassment. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: James Cleverly (Con - Braintree) They are the first charges to be brought under the new National Security Act. - Speech Link
2: Yvette Cooper (Lab - Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) keep our country safe from those who wish to do us harm, not least those who wish to undermine our democracy - Speech Link
3: James Cleverly (Con - Braintree) There is no doubt about her commitment among Government Members. - Speech Link
4: James Cleverly (Con - Braintree) As far as I am aware, no one has seized or liquidated Russian assets. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Young of Cookham (Con - Life peer) that those who stand for elected office should be protected from those who wish them or their families harm - Speech Link
2: Lord Naseby (Con - Life peer) if we go back to the 1960s, when I stood for election in the London Borough of Islington and was the first - Speech Link
3: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Con - Life peer) What more can we do? - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) Indeed—and let me first thank my noble friend for bringing up this important matter. - Speech Link
2: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) First, let me absolutely endorse the noble Lord’s sentiment: this is a deplorable way to behave that - Speech Link
3: Viscount Stansgate (Lab - Excepted Hereditary) Does Ofcom have the resources necessary to do this? - Speech Link
4: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) It is a very interesting question, but I am afraid I have no information on that as it is not DSIT’s - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Margaret Hodge (Lab - Barking) First, I call on the Government to act firmly and proscribe the IRGC as a terrorist group. - Speech Link
2: Iain Duncan Smith (Con - Chingford and Woodford Green) Lady touched on, but I first want to say something very important. - Speech Link
3: Chris Law (SNP - Dundee West) It has no interest in helping them. - Speech Link
4: Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) we do about the IRGC? - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: None This act of harm would diminish the creative industries and, in doing so, would diminish our public service - Speech Link
2: None The first is to pursue truth with no agenda, the second is to back British storytelling, and the third - Speech Link
3: None As the noble Baroness, Lady Bull, said, do not harm it. - Speech Link
4: Baroness Thornton (Lab - Life peer) There is no requirement for a minimum amount and no requirements relating to new content. - Speech Link
5: Baroness Thornton (Lab - Life peer) When the Government first released Up Next, the White Paper that preceded the Bill, it made no reference - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord de Clifford (XB - Excepted Hereditary) amendment both in Committee and in the House today, and for her support and advice in helping me table my first - Speech Link
2: Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I begin by congratulating the noble Lord, Lord de Clifford, on his first amendment. - Speech Link
3: Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Lab - Life peer) There is plenty of evidence from the RSPCA and others of the harm this causes animals, and plenty of - Speech Link
4: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer) My Lords, I apologise that this is the first time I have taken part in the debates on the Bill. - Speech Link
5: Lord Douglas-Miller (Con - Life peer) The first is the issue of Northern Ireland being used as a loophole by transporters. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Grant Shapps (Con - Welwyn Hatfield) Gentleman is right to say that the welfare of our personnel is our absolute first priority. - Speech Link
2: Bob Seely (Con - Isle of Wight) First, I thank the Minister for his call this morning. - Speech Link
3: John Redwood (Con - Wokingham) further harm can occur? - Speech Link
4: Grant Shapps (Con - Welwyn Hatfield) In answer to the first point, no, there is no indication. - Speech Link
5: Grant Shapps (Con - Welwyn Hatfield) The answers are: no evidence of ransomware; no evidence of data published; a very small number of addresses - Speech Link