Information between 8th July 2025 - 18th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 340 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 47 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 330 Labour Aye votes vs 37 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 135 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour No votes vs 47 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 35 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443 |
11 Jul 2025 - House of Commons - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 40 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 1 Noes - 58 |
11 Jul 2025 - Unauthorised Entry to Football Matches Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 42 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 0 Noes - 47 |
15 Jul 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 342 |
15 Jul 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 440 |
16 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 54 |
16 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 334 Noes - 54 |
17 Jul 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
17 Jul 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill (Third sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
17 Jul 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill (Third sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
Speeches |
---|
Amanda Hack speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Amanda Hack contributed 1 speech (59 words) Thursday 17th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
Amanda Hack speeches from: RAF Photographic Reconnaissance Unit
Amanda Hack contributed 1 speech (538 words) Thursday 17th July 2025 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Defence |
Amanda Hack speeches from: Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill (Second sitting)
Amanda Hack contributed 6 speeches (1,136 words) Committee stage: 2nd sitting Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Public Bill Committees |
Amanda Hack speeches from: Rare Cancers Bill
Amanda Hack contributed 1 speech (583 words) Report stage Friday 11th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
Amanda Hack speeches from: Business of the House
Amanda Hack contributed 1 speech (101 words) Thursday 10th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
Amanda Hack speeches from: Government Resilience Action Plan
Amanda Hack contributed 1 speech (84 words) Tuesday 8th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
Amanda Hack speeches from: Road and Rail Projects
Amanda Hack contributed 1 speech (97 words) Tuesday 8th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
Written Answers |
---|
Brain: Injuries
Asked by: Amanda Hack (Labour - North West Leicestershire) Tuesday 8th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent progress he has made on ensuring that (a) patients and (b) families affected by brain aneurysms receive adequate (i) screening, (ii) treatment, (iii) care, (iv) long-term monitoring and (v) rehabilitation. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) It is the responsibility of integrated care boards (ICBs) to make available appropriate provision to meet the health and care needs of their local population, including services for people with brain aneurysms, as they are best placed to make decisions according to local need. The process of commissioning services should take into account best practice guidance, including that published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Nationally, there are several initiatives that are supporting improvements to neurological services more generally. NHS England’s Getting It Right First Time Neurology Programme aims to reduce unwarranted variation and improve efficiency across neurological services, through data-driven analysis and best practice sharing. Additionally, NHS England’s Neurology Transformation Programme is supporting integrated care systems to transform neurology services by promoting integrated care, prevention, and early intervention. NICE is currently developing the guidance Rehabilitation for chronic neurological disorders including acquired brain injury, which is expected to be published in September 2025. The guideline covers rehabilitation in all settings for children, young people, and adults with a chronic neurological disorder, neurological impairment, or disabling neurological symptoms resulting from acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve disorder, progressive neurological disease, or functional neurological disorder. Further information is available at the following link: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-ng10181 NICE has also published the guidance Subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by a ruptured aneurysm: diagnosis and management. The guideline focuses on the diagnosis and management of individuals who are suspected of having a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) caused by ruptured aneurysm and includes recommendations on follow-up care and support for patients, their families, and carers. This guidance also covers familial aneurysms in the context of SAH and recommends that that individuals with two or more first-degree relatives who have had a SAH may be offered screening to detect potential aneurysms. This guidance is available at the following link: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng228 The Government expects the healthcare system and commissioners to take NICE guidelines fully into account when designing services for their local population, and to work towards their implementation over time. Our 10-year health plan will make the three big shifts the National Health Service needs to be prepared for future challenges, from hospital to community care, from analogue to digital, and from sickness to prevention. We are committed to expanding community-based access to tests and scans, promoting a more collaborative service delivery, and enhancing the use of apps and wearable technology. These changes will help people manage their long-term conditions, including brain aneurysms, more effectively and closer to their homes. Earlier diagnosis will play a key role in preventing disease progression and improving outcomes. |
Brain: Injuries
Asked by: Amanda Hack (Labour - North West Leicestershire) Tuesday 8th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to ensure that brain aneurysms are (a) recognised and (b) dealt with (i) in the NHS ten-year plan and (ii) by his Department. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) It is the responsibility of integrated care boards (ICBs) to make available appropriate provision to meet the health and care needs of their local population, including services for people with brain aneurysms, as they are best placed to make decisions according to local need. The process of commissioning services should take into account best practice guidance, including that published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Nationally, there are several initiatives that are supporting improvements to neurological services more generally. NHS England’s Getting It Right First Time Neurology Programme aims to reduce unwarranted variation and improve efficiency across neurological services, through data-driven analysis and best practice sharing. Additionally, NHS England’s Neurology Transformation Programme is supporting integrated care systems to transform neurology services by promoting integrated care, prevention, and early intervention. NICE is currently developing the guidance Rehabilitation for chronic neurological disorders including acquired brain injury, which is expected to be published in September 2025. The guideline covers rehabilitation in all settings for children, young people, and adults with a chronic neurological disorder, neurological impairment, or disabling neurological symptoms resulting from acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve disorder, progressive neurological disease, or functional neurological disorder. Further information is available at the following link: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-ng10181 NICE has also published the guidance Subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by a ruptured aneurysm: diagnosis and management. The guideline focuses on the diagnosis and management of individuals who are suspected of having a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) caused by ruptured aneurysm and includes recommendations on follow-up care and support for patients, their families, and carers. This guidance also covers familial aneurysms in the context of SAH and recommends that that individuals with two or more first-degree relatives who have had a SAH may be offered screening to detect potential aneurysms. This guidance is available at the following link: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng228 The Government expects the healthcare system and commissioners to take NICE guidelines fully into account when designing services for their local population, and to work towards their implementation over time. Our 10-year health plan will make the three big shifts the National Health Service needs to be prepared for future challenges, from hospital to community care, from analogue to digital, and from sickness to prevention. We are committed to expanding community-based access to tests and scans, promoting a more collaborative service delivery, and enhancing the use of apps and wearable technology. These changes will help people manage their long-term conditions, including brain aneurysms, more effectively and closer to their homes. Earlier diagnosis will play a key role in preventing disease progression and improving outcomes. |
Heart Diseases: Young People
Asked by: Amanda Hack (Labour - North West Leicestershire) Monday 14th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has had discussions with NHS England on the potential merits of funding research on using AI based on the knowledge of expert cardiologists to help interpret ECGs for the diagnosis of young people with cardiac conditions in (a) primary and (b) secondary care. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The National Health Service has set an ambitious goal in its new 10-Year Plan that by 2035, artificial intelligence (AI) should be seamlessly integrated into most clinical pathways, with tools like generative AI being widely adopted and continuously improved. The aim is for the NHS to become a global leader in the ethical use of AI. One promising area is the use of AI to interpret electrocardiograms (ECGs). While AI is not yet routinely used for ECG interpretation in NHS practice, it is being actively developed and tested in research and pilot settings. Major funders such as the British Heart Foundation, the National Institute for Health and Care Research, and the Medical Research Council are supporting this work to improve the speed, accuracy, and accessibility of ECG analysis. However, there are still important challenges to overcome. Different studies use different types of ECG recordings and data preparation methods, making it difficult to compare results or identify best practices. AI models also need further refinement to ensure they work well across diverse patient groups, including young people. Importantly, these tools must be thoroughly validated, clinicians must be trained to use them, and appropriate legal and ethical frameworks must be in place before they can be safely adopted into routine care. Research teams are working to address these barriers. For example, NHS trials are planned to begin in late 2025 at the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. These trials will test whether an AI model can accurately predict long-term health risks from routine ECGs. At the same time, United Kingdom health regulators are developing the rules and safety checks needed to ensure that AI tools are accurate, fair, and safe for patients. |
School Meals: Standards
Asked by: Amanda Hack (Labour - North West Leicestershire) Thursday 17th July 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential implications for its policies of the finding on p.22 of the report by the Food Standards Agency entitled School Food Standards Compliance Pilot: Discovery Research, published in November 2023, on the awareness by schools of their responsibilities in relation to school food standards. Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) It is important that children eat nutritious food at school and the department understands the value of compliance with the school food standards. We continue to work with the Food Standards Agency (FSA) following the findings of the compliance pilot run by the department and the FSA during the 2022/23 academic year. School governors and trustees have a responsibility to ensure compliance with the school food standards and should work with the headteacher and the senior leadership team to ensure the school is meeting its obligations. To support governors, in November 2024 the department, along with the National Governance Association, launched an online training course on school food for governors and trustees. This training is designed to improve understanding of the school food standards and give governing boards confidence to hold their school leaders to account on their whole school approach to food. Additionally, to ensure quality and nutrition in meals for the future, the department is acting quickly with experts across the sector to revise the school food standards, so every school is supported with the latest nutrition guidance. We will consider approaches to compliance to ensure children receive the nutritious meals they need. |
Early Day Motions Signed |
---|
Thursday 17th July Amanda Hack signed this EDM on Monday 21st July 2025 Changing Places Toilets Awareness Day 21 signatures (Most recent: 22 Jul 2025)Tabled by: Daniel Francis (Labour - Bexleyheath and Crayford) That this House notes Changing Places Toilet Awareness Day 2025 which takes place on 19 July; recognises the importance of Changing Places toilets for disabled people and their families across the United Kingdom; supports their call for a Changing Places toilet in all public venues so that everyone, regardless of … |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
RAF Photographic Reconnaissance Unit
38 speeches (12,414 words) Thursday 17th July 2025 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Defence Mentions: 1: David Reed (Con - Exmouth and Exeter East) Member for North West Leicestershire (Amanda Hack) talked about her constituent James, who died in an - Link to Speech 2: Julie Minns (Lab - Carlisle) and Westminster (Rachel Blake), West Ham and Beckton (James Asser), North West Leicestershire (Amanda Hack - Link to Speech |
Schools (Allergy Safety)
2 speeches (1,197 words) 1st reading Wednesday 9th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Chris Bloore (Lab - Redditch) put and agreed to.Ordered,That Chris Bloore, Tahir Ali, Sarah Coombes, Cat Eccles, Sarah Edwards, Amanda Hack - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Work and Pensions, and Department for Work and Pensions Work and Pensions Committee Found: Members present: Debbie Abrahams (Chair); Johanna Baxter; Steve Darling; Damien Egan; Gill German; Amanda Hack |
APPG Publications |
---|
Maternity APPG Document: Minutes Maternity APPG Inaugural Meeting 10 March 2025.docx Found: Hastings and Rye), Mark Ferguson MP (Gateshead Central and Whickham), Jodie Gosling MP (Nuneaton), Amanda Hack |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
16 Jul 2025
Employment support for disabled people Work and Pensions Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 29 Sep 2025) With the disability employment gap persistently at nearly 30%, the Government has announced it will spend an additional £2.2 billion on employment support over the next four years. The Committee will explore the reasons behind the disability employment gap, scrutinise Government programmes to support disabled people into work and make recommendations for future support. |
30 Jul 2025
Child Maintenance Service Work and Pensions Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Millions of children and parents are served by the Child Maintenance Service. But is it working as effectively as it could be so that the best interests of the child are being met? The Government has recently proposed changes to how the Child Maintenance Service administers payments. This inquiry will look at those proposals and more broadly how to boost the Service’s effectiveness in increasing payment compliance rates and improving the way it deals with families.
Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry. |