Information between 6th January 2026 - 16th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 26 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jim McMahon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Jim McMahon speeches from: Digital ID
Jim McMahon contributed 1 speech (148 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
|
Jim McMahon speeches from: Business of the House
Jim McMahon contributed 1 speech (80 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Jim McMahon speeches from: Northern Powerhouse Rail
Jim McMahon contributed 1 speech (127 words) Wednesday 14th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
|
Jim McMahon speeches from: Airport Drop-off Charges
Jim McMahon contributed 9 speeches (1,576 words) Tuesday 13th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Transport |
|
Jim McMahon speeches from: Business of the House
Jim McMahon contributed 1 speech (85 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Jim McMahon speeches from: Road Safety Strategy
Jim McMahon contributed 1 speech (139 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Media: Standards
Asked by: Jim McMahon (Labour (Co-op) - Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton) Wednesday 7th January 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of local and regional press and media monopolies on the adequacy of levels of varied and balanced reporting. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government remains committed to a pluralistic media landscape. A free, strong and plural media plays an essential role in democracy. It is a key source of trustworthy information and plays a vital role in holding power and public institutions to account. Under the Enterprise Act 2002’s newspaper merger regime, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport has a quasi-judicial role and can intervene on public interest grounds to refer a merger to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), subject to a jurisdictional test. These public interest grounds for intervention include plurality of views and plurality of persons with control, within the United Kingdom, or a part of the United Kingdom. More broadly, the Government is concerned about the sustainability of local journalism and DCMS is developing a Local Media Strategy, in recognition of the importance of this vital sector. We recognise that the industry has faced significant financial challenges for some time, and consolidation and mergers have been a part of the response in order to keep many struggling titles open. Our vision is a thriving local media that can continue to play an invaluable role as a key channel of trustworthy information at local level, reporting on the issues that matter to communities in a varied and balanced way, reflecting their contributions and perspectives, and helping to foster a self-confident nation in which everyone feels that their contribution is part of an inclusive national story. More will be announced on the Strategy in due course. |
|
Copyright: Artificial Intelligence
Asked by: Jim McMahon (Labour (Co-op) - Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton) Wednesday 7th January 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if she will regulate the commercial use of copyright protected material by generative AI. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) This is a complex and evolving area. The government’s priority is to get this right - not legislate prematurely. We have said that we won’t act unless that action works for creators. We continue to engage with a range of stakeholders across sectors, and with parliament as we consider all options. This includes engagement through our technical working groups and the parliamentary working group chaired by the DCMS and DSIT Secretaries of State. We will also publish an economic impact assessment and a report on the use of copyright works in the development of AI systems, by 18 March 2026. |
|
Buildings: Construction
Asked by: Jim McMahon (Labour (Co-op) - Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many (a) plumbers, (b) electricians, (c) joiners, (d) bricklayers and (e) plasterers are forecast to leave and join the labour market in each year to 2030. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The Department does not hold up to date data on the numbers of (a) plumbers, (b) electricians, (c) joiners, (d) bricklayers and (e) plasterers leaving and joining the labour market. The CITB (Construction Industry Training Board) does produce the Construction Workforce Outlook for England which projects the growth in these occupations from 2024 to 2029 and is available here: https://www.citb.co.uk/cwo/reports/cwo_report_england.pdf. |
|
Dental Services: Greater Manchester
Asked by: Jim McMahon (Labour (Co-op) - Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton) Tuesday 13th January 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many additional urgent dentist appointments will be provided in (a) Greater Manchester and (b) Oldham this year. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) We have asked integrated care boards (ICBs) to commission extra urgent dental appointments to make sure that patients with urgent dental needs can get the treatment they require. ICBs have been making extra appointments available from April 2025. Appointments are available across the country, with specific expectations for each region. These appointments are more heavily weighted towards those areas where they are needed the most. Data on delivery of urgent dental care, including additional delivery, will be published annually as part of the NHS Dental Statistics England Official Statistics series. These statistics are released each August and are the primary source of data on the delivery of NHS dental care. |
|
Discrimination: Education
Asked by: Jim McMahon (Labour (Co-op) - Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton) Tuesday 13th January 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of education in schools relating to toxic masculinity and misogyny; and what steps her Department is taking to improve culture and behaviours and to promote positive male role models. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) Every parent should be able to trust that their child is safe at school, online and in their relationships. But too often toxic ideas are taking hold early and going unchallenged. In December 2025, this government published a new strategy to tackle violence against women and girls. We want to protect young people and drive forward education on healthy relationships, and we will be investing £11 million to pilot the best interventions in schools over the next three years. The updated relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) guidance, available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/relationships-education-relationships-and-sex-education-rse-and-health-education, significantly strengthens content including an emphasis on building healthy relationships skills from the start of primary school, focusing on kindness and respect. Pupils are expected to develop an understanding of the concepts and laws around misogyny, sexual harassment and sexual violence, including recognising sexism and misogyny and how to report abuse. It emphasises opening conversations with young people about positive conceptions of masculinity and femininity, including how to identify and learn from positive male role models. Through a whole school approach, positive action should be taken to build a culture where misogynistic attitudes and behaviour are not tolerated, and any occurrences are identified and tackled. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
8 Jan 2026, 11 a.m. - House of Commons " Jim McMahon thank you, Mr. >> Speaker, and Happy New Year to you and to the House. High street banks have left many towns high and " Jim McMahon MP (Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Jan 2026, 1:14 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Jim McMahon speaker this is welcome. The North of England has been held back for far too long, " Jim McMahon MP (Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
15 Jan 2026, 10:55 a.m. - House of Commons " Jim McMahon. revision to the government's policy on the mandatory element of this, and I do think there is some " Jim McMahon MP (Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
15 Jan 2026, 11:46 a.m. - House of Commons " Jim McMahon. government might be looking to bring a package of support forward for our pubs is much welcome. We know just how important they are " Jim McMahon MP (Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Airport Drop-off Charges
66 speeches (13,596 words) Tuesday 13th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Rebecca Paul (Con - Reigate) Member for Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton (Jim McMahon) eloquently highlighted. - Link to Speech 2: Al Pinkerton (LD - Surrey Heath) Member for Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton (Jim McMahon) made a series of excellent points, and I - Link to Speech 3: Jerome Mayhew (Con - Broadland and Fakenham) Member for Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton (Jim McMahon) that it is okay to charge for drop-offs, - Link to Speech 4: Keir Mather (Lab - Selby) Friend the Member for Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton (Jim McMahon). - Link to Speech 5: Jerome Mayhew (Con - Broadland and Fakenham) Member for Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton (Jim McMahon) made the very good point that the notice - Link to Speech |