Information between 15th July 2026 - 3rd September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Jul 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 109 |
|
15 Jul 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 109 |
|
14 Jul 2026 - Public Office (Accountability) Bill - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 102 Noes - 409 |
|
14 Jul 2026 - Public Office (Accountability) Bill - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 329 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 412 |
|
14 Jul 2026 - Public Office (Accountability) Bill - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 321 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 93 Noes - 323 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 411 Noes - 102 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 427 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Katrina Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 346 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Katrina Murray speeches from: Direction of Government
Katrina Murray contributed 1 speech (67 words) Tuesday 1st September 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Horizon Shortfall Scheme: Appeals
Asked by: Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, whether he has identified any category of Horizon claimants who are unable to access an independent reassessment of compensation because they do not meet the eligibility criteria for the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process was introduced in response to concerns raised by the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board (HCAB) that many applicants to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS) may not have received comprehensive legal advice when settling their claims. The eligibility criteria therefore exclude individuals who settled with the benefit of fully funded legal advice provided by the Post Office. These criteria were developed in consultation with the HCAB, claimants’ legal representatives and postmaster organisations. This means that a small number of individuals have not been eligible to access HSSA. However, the appeals process was specifically designed to provide funded legal support from the outset, helping applicants to fully understand and pursue their claims. |
|
Horizon Shortfall Scheme: Appeals
Asked by: Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, whether he plans to review the eligibility criteria for the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process to ensure that claimants are not excluded from an independent assessment of their compensation because of legal costs arrangements. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process was introduced in response to concerns raised by the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board (HCAB) that many applicants to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS) may not have received comprehensive legal advice when settling their claims. The eligibility criteria therefore exclude individuals who settled with the benefit of fully funded legal advice provided by the Post Office. These criteria were developed in consultation with the HCAB, claimants’ legal representatives and postmaster organisations. This means that a small number of individuals have not been eligible to access HSSA. However, the appeals process was specifically designed to provide funded legal support from the outset, helping applicants to fully understand and pursue their claims. |
|
Horizon Shortfall Scheme: Appeals
Asked by: Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what guidance has been issued to officials assessing eligibility for the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process on cases involving contributions by Post Office Ltd towards claimants' legal costs. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process was introduced in response to concerns raised by the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board (HCAB) that many applicants to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS) may not have received comprehensive legal advice when settling their claims. The eligibility criteria therefore exclude individuals who settled with the benefit of fully funded legal advice provided by the Post Office. These criteria were developed in consultation with the HCAB, claimants’ legal representatives and postmaster organisations. This means that a small number of individuals have not been eligible to access HSSA. However, the appeals process was specifically designed to provide funded legal support from the outset, helping applicants to fully understand and pursue their claims. |
|
Horizon Shortfall Scheme: Appeals
Asked by: Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, how many claimants have been found ineligible for the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process because they received a contribution from Post Office Ltd towards legal costs. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process was introduced in response to concerns raised by the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board (HCAB) that many applicants to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS) may not have received comprehensive legal advice when settling their claims. The eligibility criteria therefore exclude individuals who settled with the benefit of fully funded legal advice provided by the Post Office. These criteria were developed in consultation with the HCAB, claimants’ legal representatives and postmaster organisations. This means that a small number of individuals have not been eligible to access HSSA. However, the appeals process was specifically designed to provide funded legal support from the outset, helping applicants to fully understand and pursue their claims. |
|
Horizon Shortfall Scheme: Appeals
Asked by: Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, for what reason claimants are excluded from the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process where Post Office Ltd contributed towards part of their legal costs. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process was introduced in response to concerns raised by the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board (HCAB) that many applicants to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS) may not have received comprehensive legal advice when settling their claims. The eligibility criteria therefore exclude individuals who settled with the benefit of fully funded legal advice provided by the Post Office. These criteria were developed in consultation with the HCAB, claimants’ legal representatives and postmaster organisations. This means that a small number of individuals have not been eligible to access HSSA. However, the appeals process was specifically designed to provide funded legal support from the outset, helping applicants to fully understand and pursue their claims. |
|
Horizon Shortfall Scheme: Appeals
Asked by: Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, whether the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process contains any discretion to admit exceptional cases where the application of the eligibility criteria would prevent a claimant's compensation from being independently reassessed. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process was introduced in response to concerns raised by the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board (HCAB) that many applicants to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS) may not have received comprehensive legal advice when settling their claims. The eligibility criteria therefore exclude individuals who settled with the benefit of fully funded legal advice provided by the Post Office. These criteria were developed in consultation with the HCAB, claimants’ legal representatives and postmaster organisations. This means that a small number of individuals have not been eligible to access HSSA. However, the appeals process was specifically designed to provide funded legal support from the outset, helping applicants to fully understand and pursue their claims. |
|
Horizon Shortfall Scheme: Appeals
Asked by: Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, whether claimants whose compensation has not been independently reassessed because they received a contribution from Post Office Ltd towards legal costs meet the eligibility criteria for the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process was introduced in response to concerns raised by the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board (HCAB) that many applicants to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS) may not have received comprehensive legal advice when settling their claims. The eligibility criteria therefore exclude individuals who settled with the benefit of fully funded legal advice provided by the Post Office. These criteria were developed in consultation with the HCAB, claimants’ legal representatives and postmaster organisations. This means that a small number of individuals have not been eligible to access HSSA. However, the appeals process was specifically designed to provide funded legal support from the outset, helping applicants to fully understand and pursue their claims. |
|
Horizon Shortfall Scheme: Appeals
Asked by: Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment he has made of the equity of applying eligibility criteria for the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process based on legal costs arrangements entered into before that appeals process existed. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process was introduced in response to concerns raised by the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board (HCAB) that many applicants to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS) may not have received comprehensive legal advice when settling their claims. The eligibility criteria therefore exclude individuals who settled with the benefit of fully funded legal advice provided by the Post Office. These criteria were developed in consultation with the HCAB, claimants’ legal representatives and postmaster organisations. This means that a small number of individuals have not been eligible to access HSSA. However, the appeals process was specifically designed to provide funded legal support from the outset, helping applicants to fully understand and pursue their claims. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Wednesday 9th September Katrina Murray signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 10th September 2026 John McNab Not In Vain campaign 6 signatures (Most recent: 14 Sep 2026)Tabled by: Tracy Gilbert (Labour - Edinburgh North and Leith) That this House remembers John McNab, who tragically lost his life following a stabbing in Leith on 2nd September 2025; commends his mother, Lisa Petrie, for establishing the Not In Vain campaign in his memory; recognises the campaign's work is to increase access to emergency bleed control kits and training … |
|
Wednesday 15th July Katrina Murray signed this EDM on Thursday 16th July 2026 Retirement of Godfrey Asare and Margaret Labulo from the Members' Tea Room 38 signatures (Most recent: 3 Sep 2026)Tabled by: Josh Babarinde (Liberal Democrat - Eastbourne) That this House pays tribute to Godfrey Asare and Margaret Labulo, General Assistants in the Members' Tea Room, on the occasion of their retirement from the service of Parliament; recognises their many years of dedicated and loyal service to this House and its Members and staff who have relied upon … |
|
Monday 13th July Katrina Murray signed this EDM on Thursday 16th July 2026 80 signatures (Most recent: 3 Sep 2026) Tabled by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) That this House celebrates Richard Pengelly and his 37 years of dedicated service to the House of Commons; notes that he began his parliamentary career in the Pugin Room before becoming one of the best-known and best-loved faces behind the bar in the Strangers’ Bar; recognises that his warmth, kindness, … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
1 Sep 2026, 5:19 p.m. - House of Commons " Katrina Murray thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. >> And I welcome my right hon. Friend to to his place during the summer recess, I spent time " Katrina Murray MP (Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 3rd September 2026
Special Report - 2nd Special Report - Policing and security in Northern Ireland: Government Response Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Found: Newcastle-under-Lyme) Mike Kane (Labour; Wythenshawe and Sale East) Mr Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat; Wimbledon) Katrina Murray |
|
Wednesday 15th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Northern Ireland Office, and Northern Ireland Office Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Found: Tonia Antoniazzi (Chair); Chris Bloore; Claire Hanna; Adam Jogee; Mike Kane; Mr Paul Kohler; Katrina Murray |
|
Wednesday 15th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Northern Ireland Fiscal Council, Northern Ireland Fiscal Council, and Northern Ireland Fiscal Council Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Found: Tonia Antoniazzi (Chair); Chris Bloore; Claire Hanna; Adam Jogee; Mike Kane; Mr Paul Kohler; Katrina Murray |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 2nd September 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 2nd September 2026 9 a.m. Northern Ireland Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The taxation of the hospitality and tourism sectors in Northern Ireland At 9:45am: Oral evidence Michael Cadden - Chair at Hospitality Ulster Selina Horshi - Member at Hospitality Ulster Adrian Cummins - CEO at Restaurants Association of Ireland At 10:45am: Oral evidence Gareth Hetherington - Director of the Economic Policy Centre at Ulster University View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 9th September 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 9th September 2026 9 a.m. Northern Ireland Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Reconciliation At 9:30am: Oral evidence Sandra Peake - Chief Executive Officer at Wave Trauma Centre Kenny Donaldson - Director at SEFF Mark Thompson - CEO at Relatives for Justice (RFJ) At 10:30am: Oral evidence Joe McVey OBE - Commissioner at Commission for Victims and Survivors for Northern Ireland View calendar - Add to calendar |