Preet Kaur Gill Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Preet Kaur Gill

Information between 12th April 2026 - 2nd May 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 245 Labour Aye votes vs 4 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 261 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 162
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 289 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 158
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 159
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 61
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 156
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 149
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152
27 Apr 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over) - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 176
27 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 164
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 268 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 171
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 170
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 265 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 170
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 268 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 167
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 64
28 Apr 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 6 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 28
28 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 158
28 Apr 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 81
28 Apr 2026 - Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges - View Vote Context
Preet Kaur Gill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour No votes vs 15 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 335


Speeches
Preet Kaur Gill speeches from: Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges
Preet Kaur Gill contributed 1 speech (59 words)
Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Preet Kaur Gill speeches from: Peter Mandelson: Government Appointment
Preet Kaur Gill contributed 1 speech (41 words)
Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office
Preet Kaur Gill speeches from: Security Vetting
Preet Kaur Gill contributed 1 speech (101 words)
Monday 20th April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office


Written Answers
Employment: Women
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask the Minister for Cabinet Office, what information his Department holds on the number of women who are employed by companies with more than 250 employees.

Answered by Satvir Kaur - Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet Office)

The information requested falls under the remit of the UK Statistics Authority.

A response to the Hon lady’s Parliamentary Question of 25th March is attached.

Equal Pay: Disability
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of using the Government Statistical Service categories in the Government's response to the consultation on ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting on the risk of legal challenge relating to the inclusion of Sikhs and Jews as distinct ethnicity options.

Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

Public bodies usually collect ethnicity data in line with the ethnicity harmonised standard, which is developed by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

The current harmonised standard for ethnicity data does not include specific “Sikh” and “Jewish” categories for a person’s ethnic group. However, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which is independent of government, is currently running a public consultation which seeks to review the harmonised standard to ensure it meets the needs of both data users and respondents. The views of Sikh and Jewish communities are being carefully considered as part of the review. We will monitor its progress and consider its findings closely.

We published the government response to the consultation on mandatory ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting on 25 March. The majority of respondents (77%) agreed with the proposal in the consultation that large employers should collect ethnicity data using the GSS harmonised standards for ethnicity.

The legislation being developed will provide flexibility if the list of ethnicity classifications of the harmonised standard is updated following the review.

Equal Pay: Gender
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Wednesday 15th April 2026

Question

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, whether Gender Pay Gap Reporting will use biological sex.

Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

We recognise that the terms “male”, “female”, “men” and “women” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a person’s biological sex, and that this has implications for the guidance provided on gender pay gap reporting.

As currently set out on the “Preparing your data” guidance page, we are reviewing the relevant section of this guidance to ensure it is accurate. Further updates on this will be provided shortly.

Health Services: Innovation
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Thursday 16th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what progress has been made in establishing Regional Health Innovation Zones as part of the Life Sciences Sector Plan.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed

Work to establish Regional Health Innovation Zones is ongoing. Given the cross-cutting nature of the policy, spanning health, research, local government, and economic systems, significant engagement and careful policy design are essential before any Regional Health Innovation Zones can be formally established.

Officials have conducted substantial internal engagement across Government departments and with NHS England to build out the conceptual model and ensure it is aligned with wider strategic priorities. Substantial engagement with local government, National Health Service systems, and industry will happen in due course.

Health Services: Innovation
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Thursday 16th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what consideration has been given to the West Midlands and Birmingham as an early Regional Health Innovation Zone.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed

Regional Health Innovation Zones will be selected using a fair and open bidding process.

Initially, two to three regions with strong existing life sciences assets, including data assets, research infrastructure, Health Innovation Networks, industry footprints, and local government support, and a clear plan for how to use the designation will be selected as trailblazers.

Further information on the process and timelines for how regions can secure zone designation will be shared in due course, once finalised, to ensure a fair and transparent opportunity for all interested areas.

Strokes: Health Services
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to improve early intervention for strokes.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Department recognises the importance of early access to treatment in the event of a stroke. We have committed to improving ambulance response times for category 2 incidents, which includes strokes, from 30 to 25 minutes on average in 2026/27.

The National Health Service is also working to increase the delivery of thrombolysis and thrombectomy rates as a key intervention to support improved patient outcomes.

Radiotherapy: West Midlands
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to improve access to radiotherapy for cancer patients in the West Midlands.

Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Department remains committed to ensuring that all patients have access to timely diagnosis and treatments, including those in the West Midlands.

Radiotherapy is vital in cancer care, and it remains a key priority for the Government to provide the highest quality of treatment available. We have invested £70 million of central funding into new radiotherapy treatment machines to replace older, less efficient machines. These newer machines will reduce treatment times, boost productivity, and allow more patients to be seen over the same period.

Responsibility for purchasing new machines sits at the local level. Local providers have been allocated £15 billion in operational capital for local priorities, and £5 billion to support a return to constitutional standards on waiting times. We expect local systems to use this capital to deliver further investment into new radiotherapy equipment, to meet local needs, including for patients in the West Midlands.

Through the National Cancer Plan, we are modernising cancer services, expanding the workforce and tackling inequalities in access, so that all patients receive high-quality care regardless of where they live.

Strokes: Rehabilitation
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of stroke rehabilitation provision across England; and what steps are being taken to reduce regional disparities in access to specialist rehabilitation services for stroke survivors.

Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government is committed to achieving a 25% reduction in premature mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke across England. To accelerate progress and tackle variation across the country, a new CVD Modern Service Framework will be published in 2026. This framework will support improvement, reduce inequalities, and foster innovation where it is needed most.

The National Integrated Community Stroke Service (ICSS) Model provides best practice for stroke care, including post-discharge, which should include comprehensive rehabilitation and personalised care and support.

The National Stroke Quality Improvement in Rehabilitation programme is helping to transform community-based care by increasing access to specialist stroke rehabilitation at home. NHS England continues to provide the national clinical leadership needed to transform services so there is less fragmented provision, moving from separate delivery of early supported discharge and separate community stroke teams to integrated teams delivering the ICSS model.

Strokes: Mental Health Services
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Tuesday 21st April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to ensure timely access to mental health services for stroke survivors and their families.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed

The National Health Service Integrated Community Stroke Service model sets out that rehabilitation should begin as soon as the patient is medically stable, often within 24 to 72 hours following discharge. Rehabilitation should be tailored to the individual's needs, focusing on regaining independence, improving mobility, and managing cognitive or emotional changes.

Access to community-based stroke rehabilitation services has increased across England, for instance access to Early Supported Discharge/community stroke teams has increased from 64.5% in October 2024 to 67.5% in September 2025.

NHS England is supporting improvements through funding for 20 Integrated Stroke Delivery Networks and the Stroke Quality Improvement for Rehabilitation network, embedded in each NHS England region.

Strokes: Health Services
Asked by: Preet Kaur Gill (Labour (Co-op) - Birmingham Edgbaston)
Tuesday 21st April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to improve support for stroke survivors and their families during the transition from hospital to home.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed

As set out in the 10-Year Health Plan, we are committed to improving services for patients locally by increasing the provision of services outside of a hospital setting that are delivered closer to home in the community.

The National Stroke Service Model provides best practice for stroke care, including post-discharge, which should include comprehensive rehabilitation and personalised care and support.

The National Stroke Quality Improvement in Rehabilitation programme is helping to transform community-based care by increasing access to specialist stroke rehabilitation at home.




Preet Kaur Gill mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

20 Apr 2026, 4:21 p.m. - House of Commons
" Preet Kaur Gill Mr. Speaker, the House and the public understand the importance of independent security vetting and why sensitive personal vetting and why sensitive personal information must be protected. But they are also shocked that decisions of such significance "
Preet Kaur Gill MP (Birmingham Edgbaston, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript