Rebecca Long Bailey - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Rebecca Long Bailey

Information between 8th December 2025 - 18th December 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 96
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 162
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 162
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 395 Noes - 98
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 96
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 332
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 173
10 Dec 2025 - Seasonal Work - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 325
10 Dec 2025 - Conduct of the Chancellor of the Exchequer - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 297
10 Dec 2025 - Seasonal Work - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 98
15 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 96
16 Dec 2025 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 329 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 341 Noes - 195
16 Dec 2025 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Long Bailey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 118 Noes - 340

Speeches
Rebecca Long Bailey speeches from: Kashmir: Self-determination Rebecca Long Bailey contributed 1 speech (44 words) Wednesday 10th December 2025 - Westminster Hall Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Rebecca Long Bailey speeches from: Railways Bill Rebecca Long Bailey contributed 1 speech (645 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 9th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport
Rebecca Long Bailey speeches from: Digital ID Rebecca Long Bailey contributed 3 speeches (478 words) Monday 8th December 2025 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office

Written Answers
Railways: Access Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the sanction of a Withdrawal of Implied Permission notice by one Train Operating Company is confined to the services of the train operating company applying that sanction. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Individuals who have been issued with a full Withdrawal of Implied Permission (WIP) will be banned from accessing the station the WIP was issued from and will be prohibited from using any train of that particular train operating company that passes through the same station.
Railways: Access Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which train companies contracted to her Department utilise Withdrawal of Implied Permission notices. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Usage of Withdrawal of Implied Permission (WIP) notices are an operational matter for the train operating company or Network Rail. The Department does not hold data on which operators utilise WIPs.
Railways: Access Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking to support the development of a railway-wide Withdrawal of Implied Permission notice. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Department keeps security under constant review, however no change of policy for Withdrawal of Implied Permission (WIP) is planned at this stage.
Railways: Access Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what data she holds on the use of Withdrawal of Implied Permission notices by train operating companies. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Use of Withdrawal of Implied Permission (WIP) notices is an operational matter for the train operating companies. The Department does not hold data on WIP notices.
Railways: Access Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what guidance she has given to train companies contracted to her Department on the usage of Withdrawal of Implied Permission notices. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Usage of Withdrawal of Implied Permission (WIP) notices are an operational matter for the train operating company or Network Rail and the Department does not issue guidance. The Rail Delivery Group are able to provide guidance to operators on WIP notices.
Alaa Abd El-Fattah Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) Tuesday 9th December 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what recent progress her Department has made in ensuring British-Egyptian national Alaa Abd El-Fattah's safe travel to the UK. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) As I stated in the latest session of FCDO Oral Questions on 2 December, the Prime Minister raised this case with President Sisi on 18 November, and the Foreign Secretary has pressed for Mr el-Fattah's return on multiple occasions with the Egyptian Foreign Minister, most recently on 25 November. Mr el-Fattah must be allowed to return to the UK and be reunited with his family.

Written Answers

Railways: Access
Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford)
Monday 8th December 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the sanction of a Withdrawal of Implied Permission notice by one Train Operating Company is confined to the services of the train operating company applying that sanction.