Information between 12th November 2025 - 2nd December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 105 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 327 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Telecommunications - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 321 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Richard Tice speeches from: Office for Budget Responsibility Forecasts
Richard Tice contributed 1 speech (95 words) Monday 1st December 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Richard Tice speeches from: Budget: Press Briefings
Richard Tice contributed 1 speech (51 words) Monday 17th November 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Teachers: Workplace Pensions
Asked by: Richard Tice (Reform UK - Boston and Skegness) Wednesday 26th November 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of awarding the Teachers’ Pension Scheme administration contract to Tata Consultancy Services on national security, service standards and domestic employment; and whether UK-based providers were invited to bid for this contract. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) The procurement to appoint a new administrator of the Teachers’ Pension Scheme was conducted under the Public Contract Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), which aims to ensure an open, transparent and fair competition. During the procurement exercise several UK companies participated in the formal process. This procurement followed the standard due diligence checks and the standard departmental governance procedures. These checks did not highlight any concerns in relation to national security. As part of the assessment process the potential bidders were required to contractually commit to the mandatory requirements to meet all necessary IT security standards. Domestic employment was not a part of the evaluation criteria for potential providers. The evaluation criteria did assess a potential provider’s capability to meet the required service standards. |
|
HMP Dartmoor
Asked by: Richard Tice (Reform UK - Boston and Skegness) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, for what reason HMP Dartmoor remains closed in the context of the shortage of prison spaces. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip Following the temporary closure of HMP Dartmoor in August 2024, after detection of elevated levels of radon gas, we have been working with specialist radon experts to investigate and assess options to allow us to reopen the prison safely. The decision on reopening will be made based on the viability of the site, the effectiveness of works to reduce levels of radon, and value for money. We need to be satisfied that reopening the prison is justified in the light of a range of considerations, including compliance with legislative requirements, operational viability, and the cost of mitigation measures. |
|
Employment: Statistics
Asked by: Richard Tice (Reform UK - Boston and Skegness) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment her Department has made of the (a) transparency and (b) independence of the process used by the Office for National Statistics to revise historic employment data; and what discussions she has had with the Office for National Statistics on the revisions made since July 2024. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The ONS is an independent organisation and is accountable to the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) board and the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR) for the transparency and independence of its statistics. The Government trusts economic statistics produced by the ONS. The Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR) is responsible for ensuring that official statistics meet the standards set out in the Code of Practice, including the requirements set out in the Code’s Standards for Official Statistics that: - ‘Producers must lead responsibly and make impartial decisions about statistics, under the direction and authority of the Chief Statistician/Head of Profession for Statistics - ‘Producers must release statistics in a transparent way.’ - Producers must be ‘open about quality’ and must ‘prominently explain the quality of the statistics’.
The OSR continues periodically to review labour market statistics from the Labour Force Survey against the Code of Practice for Statistics. Their most recent report, published in February 2025, highlighted ONS’s efforts to ensure transparency.
Revisions to the Labour Force Survey employment data since July 2024, such as those relating to the reweighting of the survey in December 2024, have been communicated by the ONS publicly. The ONS continues to advise caution when interpreting changes in the Labour Force Survey over the past two years due to the effects of methodological changes. The Treasury is engaged with the ONS’ processes on data quality monitoring, with engagement at every level.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
17 Nov 2025, 4:02 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Richard Tice. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. >> Given the chaos around this budget, none of us, frankly, would " Richard Tice MP (Boston and Skegness, Reform UK) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
25 Nov 2025, 1:30 p.m. - House of Commons "House hearing this, knowing they're sitting on their hands and doing absolutely nothing about it. >> Richard Tice. " Mr Alex Barros-Curtis MP (Cardiff West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
25 Nov 2025, 1:30 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Richard Tice. >> Thank you. Madam Deputy Speaker. May I may. >> I remind the House. May I. " Mr Alex Barros-Curtis MP (Cardiff West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Budget Resolutions
264 speeches (48,734 words) Wednesday 26th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Bill Esterson (Lab - Sefton Central) Member for Boston and Skegness (Richard Tice), has just tried to tell us it is. - Link to Speech |
| Parliamentary Research |
|---|
|
Autumn Budget 2025: Background briefing - CBP-10400
Nov. 20 2025 Found: the Bank of England, 29 August 2025 169 Reform UK, Our contract with you, 2024; Letter from Richard Tice |