Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what guidance his Department provides on the assessment of cumulative and in-combination recreational impacts on Special Areas of Conservation where multiple housing developments and associated mitigation schemes are proposed within the same zone of influence; and whether such assessments should take account of (a) cross-use of mitigation areas, (b) shared rights of way and (c) cumulative visitor pressure on the protected site.

Answered by Jenny Riddell-Carpenter - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The overarching policy framework for assessment of development impacts on Special Areas of Conservation is provided by the National Planning Policy Framework. There is also guidance on how to undertake Habitats Regulations Assessments on gov.uk. This policy and guidance make clear that assessment of impact should take into account instances where the impact of a number of projects may act and become significant in combination. It also follows from the guidance that developers and planning authorities will need to consider the multiple uses of land where this affects the likelihood of impacts and effectiveness of mitigation measures.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what guidance her Department provides to train operating companies on maintaining the availability of lower-priced Advance fares on peak commuter services.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

Advance fares are not regulated by the Government and their availability is a commercial decision for train operators. They are priced according to demand for a particular service and vary by route, date and time of travel, and time of booking.

Decisions on the number, price and availability of Advance fares on individual services, including peak commuter services, remain matters for the relevant operator.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether his Department has made an assessment of the adequacy of the North Meadow Special Area of Conservation Interim Mitigation Strategy in the context of levels of residential development proposed within its Inner Zone of Influence; and whether Natural England plans to review or update that strategy.

Answered by Jenny Riddell-Carpenter - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

An important part of the context is that not enough approved development has been built-out yet, so the adequacy of on- and off-site mitigation measures are yet to be tested. Monitoring cannot yet tell us whether these measures are sufficient or not as visitor numbers have not yet increased due to new growth and development.

As such, we do not feel that the interim strategy needs reviewing at this stage. We will continue to work with the Local Planning Authority, review monitoring data when it is available and review the success of the Strategy in 2028 before coming to conclusions about its effectiveness.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, which public body is responsible for maintaining strategic oversight of the cumulative impact of housing development on North Meadow Special Area of Conservation; and what arrangements are in place to (a) monitor the combined effectiveness of strategic and development-specific mitigation and (b) take corrective action where that mitigation does not prevent additional recreational pressure on the site.

Answered by Jenny Riddell-Carpenter - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Local Planning Authority is the responsible body for maintaining oversight for the impact of housing on the natural environment. We will work in partnership with the Local Planning Authority to monitor and review the effectiveness of the mitigation for development around North Meadow Special Area of Conservation and, through discussion, we will make any amendments to the plan. We see the local community as key to the effectiveness of the North Meadow Special Area of Conservation Interim Mitigation Strategy and wish to develop our relationship further with interested parties.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that passengers paying premium Advance fares on peak services are provided with sufficient seating capacity.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The provision of Advance fares is a commercial decision for train operators. Advance fares are priced according to demand for a particular service and vary by route, date, time of travel and time of booking.

Advance fares are sold with a seat reservation and are therefore limited in number. Train operators manage the availability of Advance fares alongside the capacity available on each service.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department monitors changes in the availability of the lowest-priced Advance rail fares on commuter routes operated by Great Western Railway.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Department does not routinely monitor the availability of individual Advance fare price points on specific GWR routes. Advance fares are not regulated by the Government and are managed on a commercial basis by train operators. They are priced according to demand for a particular service, and their price and availability can vary depending on the route, date and time of travel, and when the ticket is purchased.

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she has made an assessment of potential merits of introducing (a) additional oversight and (b) inspection of local authority SEND services where there is evidence of systemic delays or repeated findings against authorities at the SEND Tribunal.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

The department holds local authorities to account in delivering their responsibilities on special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Where failure is persistent, the department may intervene directly, using statutory powers and improvement partners to support service improvement.

Area SEND inspections also help make sure local services are meeting the needs of children and young people with SEND. There will be a full consultation on proposed changes to the Area SEND inspection framework too, looking at changes to inspection as a result of changes to roles, responsibilities and statutory duties of local area partners and wider SEND reforms.

In our ‘SEND Reform: Putting children and young people first’ consultation, we proposed measures to improve local authorities’ future decision-making and transparency around Tribunal outcomes. This included proposals to publish an annual SEND Tribunal outcomes dashboard and introduce new requirements on local authorities following Tribunal judgments, for example to publish regular summaries of judgments made against them. We are currently considering all consultation feedback and will publish final proposals in due course.

The Ministry of Justice publishes information about the number of SEND Tribunal cases, including the number of cases conceded, in the SEND Tribunal Tables.

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to improve transparency and accountability in local authority SEND decision-making where concerns have been raised regarding delays in providing statutory support.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

The department holds local authorities to account in delivering their responsibilities on special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Where failure is persistent, the department may intervene directly, using statutory powers and improvement partners to support service improvement.

Area SEND inspections also help make sure local services are meeting the needs of children and young people with SEND. There will be a full consultation on proposed changes to the Area SEND inspection framework too, looking at changes to inspection as a result of changes to roles, responsibilities and statutory duties of local area partners and wider SEND reforms.

In our ‘SEND Reform: Putting children and young people first’ consultation, we proposed measures to improve local authorities’ future decision-making and transparency around Tribunal outcomes. This included proposals to publish an annual SEND Tribunal outcomes dashboard and introduce new requirements on local authorities following Tribunal judgments, for example to publish regular summaries of judgments made against them. We are currently considering all consultation feedback and will publish final proposals in due course.

The Ministry of Justice publishes information about the number of SEND Tribunal cases, including the number of cases conceded, in the SEND Tribunal Tables.

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department has made an estimate of the proportion of Education, Health and Care Plan appeals conceded immediately prior to SEND Tribunal hearings; and if she will publish data on the number of such cases and the average length of time children waited for provision before concessions were made.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

The department holds local authorities to account in delivering their responsibilities on special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Where failure is persistent, the department may intervene directly, using statutory powers and improvement partners to support service improvement.

Area SEND inspections also help make sure local services are meeting the needs of children and young people with SEND. There will be a full consultation on proposed changes to the Area SEND inspection framework too, looking at changes to inspection as a result of changes to roles, responsibilities and statutory duties of local area partners and wider SEND reforms.

In our ‘SEND Reform: Putting children and young people first’ consultation, we proposed measures to improve local authorities’ future decision-making and transparency around Tribunal outcomes. This included proposals to publish an annual SEND Tribunal outcomes dashboard and introduce new requirements on local authorities following Tribunal judgments, for example to publish regular summaries of judgments made against them. We are currently considering all consultation feedback and will publish final proposals in due course.

The Ministry of Justice publishes information about the number of SEND Tribunal cases, including the number of cases conceded, in the SEND Tribunal Tables.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many and what proportion of rail journeys between Kemble and London Paddington are made using Advance tickets rather than regulated fare products.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Department does not centrally hold information on how many, or what proportion of, rail journeys between Kemble and London Paddington were made on Advance tickets rather than regulated products. While detailed fares data exist within industry systems, the Department does not routinely compile journey‑by‑journey comparisons and producing this information would require bespoke analysis.

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that any future reforms to the SEND system do not weaken the statutory rights of children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities, including rights to assessment, appeal and appropriate provision.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

I refer the hon. Member for South Cotswolds to the answer of 22 June 2026 to Question 5520.

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of commissioning a Military Aviation Noise Contour assessment for RAF Fairford in line with Joint Services Publication 418; and if he will make a statement on the timetable for doing so.

Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for the Armed Forces)

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) are undertaking a programme to assess noise risk based on the levels of aircraft movement at various Defence sites. RAF Fairford is undergoing an Initial Noise Impact Assessment that will add detail to where the base falls on a list of all priority sites for potential future Military Aviation Noise Contour (MANC) assessment. The MOD will provide an update in due course.

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of wider access to continuous glucose monitoring on the level of health inequalities associated with Type 2 diabetes.

Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

I refer the Hon Member to the answer provided to the Hon Member for West Dorset on 4 February 2026 in response to Question 106435.

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to her Department's press release entitled New heart disease and strokes plan to save thousands of lives, published on 7 July 2026, whether she plans to make continuous glucose monitoring available to participants in the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme as part of the prevention accelerators programme.

Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

I refer the Hon Member to the answer provided to the Hon Member for West Dorset on 4 February 2026 in response to Question 106435.

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of continuous glucose monitoring on achieving the prevention objectives set out in the cardiovascular disease modern service framework, published on 7 July 2026.

Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

I refer the Hon Member to the answer provided to the Hon Member for West Dorset on 4 February 2026 in response to Question 106435.

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment her Department has made of the evidence on the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in supporting behaviour change and reducing progression from pre-diabetes to Type 2 diabetes.

Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

I refer the Hon Member to the answer provided to the Hon Member for West Dorset on 4 February 2026 in response to Question 106435.

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of extending eligibility for continuous glucose monitoring to people with pre-diabetes and those with early Type 2 diabetes.

Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

I refer the Hon Member to the answer provided to the Hon Member for West Dorset on 4 February 2026 in response to Question 106435.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she has made an assessment of the potential impact of rail fare on commuters who rely on unregulated advance fares.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

Advance fares are not regulated by the Government and are managed on a commercial basis by train operators. They are priced according to demand for a particular service and can provide savings for passengers who are able to commit to a specific train, although their price and availability vary by route, service and time of booking.

The Government recognises that affordability is vital. The Railways Bill sets out a new framework which includes a role for the Transport Secretary to ensure that fares are set to balance passenger affordability with taxpayer value. Through Great British Railways, the Government is taking steps to simplify fares and ticketing and deliver a more consistent offer across the network.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department plans to review regulated rail ticket products to reflect hybrid working patterns.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Government recognises that travel patterns have changed in recent years and is committed to ensuring fares and ticketing systems adapt so that passengers can travel affordably and flexibly. Flexible Season Tickets were introduced to support flexible commuting patterns and provide eight days’ travel within a 28-day period.

Through Great British Railways, passengers will benefit from a more consistent offer across the network, with reforms to simplify fares, expand Pay As You Go ticketing and make rail travel better suited to modern travel patterns, while balancing affordability for passengers with value for taxpayers.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of existing Flexi Season ticket products for passengers travelling to work three days per week.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

Flexible Season Tickets were introduced to support passengers who travel two or three days a week and provide eight days’ travel within a 28-day period. The discount offered varies by route, reflecting existing fare structures, but provides a minimum 20 per cent discount against the equivalent monthly season ticket.

Passengers travelling three days a week can purchase more than one Flexible Season Ticket, although on some routes a traditional monthly or annual season ticket may provide better value. The most suitable ticket for any passenger will depend on their travel patterns and the fares available on their route. The Government aims to review the overall cost-effectiveness of Flexible Season Tickets as part of its wider work to ensure that fares and ticketing continue to reflect changing travel patterns and passenger needs.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department collects data on the average price paid by passengers travelling between Kemble and London Paddington using Advance tickets.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Department does not centrally hold information on the average price paid by passengers using Advance tickets between Kemble and London Paddington. While detailed fares data exist within industry systems, the Department does not routinely compile journey‑by‑journey comparisons and producing this information would require bespoke analysis.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the changes in the cost of Advance rail fares for commuters travelling between Kemble and London Paddington over the last two years.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Department has not undertaken a specific assessment of changes in the cost of Advance fares for travel between Kemble and London Paddington over the last two years.

Advance fares are not regulated by the Government and are managed on a commercial basis by train operators. Advance fares are intended to provide discounted travel options for passengers who book ahead and travel on specified services. They are priced according to demand for a particular service, and their price and availability can vary depending on the route, date and time of travel, and when the ticket is purchased. The Department continues to monitor fare levels and passenger demand across the network through regular engagement with train operators, including Great Western Railway (GWR).

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of passenger numbers on peak Great Western Railway services between Kemble and London Paddington during the last 12 months.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

There has been passenger growth on services between Kemble and London Paddington over the last year. Great Western Railway is responsible for ensuring that sufficient capacity is provided to meet passenger demand and there is regular engagement with the operator to review service provision.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of passenger numbers on peak Great Western Railway services between Kemble and London Paddington during the last 12 months.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

There has been passenger growth on services between Kemble and London Paddington over the last year. Great Western Railway is responsible for ensuring that sufficient capacity is provided to meet passenger demand and there is regular engagement with the operator to review service provision.

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment he has made of the impact of the reduction in the UK's Official Development Assistance budget on programmes aimed at reducing extreme poverty; and what plans he has to restore Official Development Assistance spending to 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income.

Answered by Kirsty McNeill - Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

Reducing the overall size of the UK Official Development Assistance (ODA) budget will necessarily have an impact on the scale and shape of the work we do to reduce extreme poverty. While it is not possible to mitigate all negative impacts of reductions, equalities impact assessments informed decision-making and ensured that allocations across multilateral programmes and central programme spending do not cause disproportionate negative equalities impacts. The Government remains committed to returning to spending 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income on ODA when the fiscal circumstances allow.

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of increasing Advance rail fares on passengers who commute two or three days per week.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

Advance fares are not regulated by the Government and are managed on a commercial basis by train operators. They are priced according to demand for a particular service, and their price and availability can vary depending on the route, date and time of travel, and when the ticket is purchased.

Working 4 Wellbeing: fifth anniversary

Royal National Lifeboat Institution (No. 2)

Epsom Common Local Nature Reserve awarded 20th consecutive Green Flag Award

Josh Kerr's mile world record

Employer National Insurance contributions

Love Me Love My Mind 20th anniversary

50th anniversary of Torbay Civic Society

E1 settlement project and international law

George Henry Longley's CHRONOS at Fresh Wharf

Funding of Jodrell Bank Observatory

Society lottery limits

Cosmetic specifications for fresh produce and national food security

Devon maternity services

Five-year indefinite leave to remain pathway for Skilled Worker visa holders (No. 2)

Submit Evidence (by 21 Oct 2026)

In its latest advice to the government, the CCC said that climate change is already disrupting life in the UK and said that the UK’s national approach to climate adaption is “not fit for purpose”. It has also argued that the government’s third National Adaptation Plan (NAP3) is not adequately preparing the UK for climate change.