Information between 2nd March 2026 - 12th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 10 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 203 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 311 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 292 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 161 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 279 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 283 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 292 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Technology Sovereignty
Allison Gardner contributed 1 speech (376 words) Tuesday 10th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Business of the House
Allison Gardner contributed 1 speech (66 words) Thursday 5th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Local Museums
Allison Gardner contributed 1 speech (641 words) Thursday 5th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Ministry of Defence
Allison Gardner contributed 1 speech (459 words) Wednesday 4th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Defence |
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Department for Business and Trade
Allison Gardner contributed 1 speech (39 words) Wednesday 4th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Menopause: Screening
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent progress has been made on incorporating menopause screening into NHS Health Checks. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) We are currently working with experts, including general practitioners, to co-design the menopause content for the NHS Health Check. The inclusion of menopause in the NHS Health Check will support eligible women across England to access high quality information on the menopause, including advice on managing symptoms and where to seek support. We will ask local authorities to implement this addition in the NHS Health Checks later this year and will urge them to implement it as quickly as possible. |
|
Urinary Tract Infections: Diagnosis
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of using uropathogen infection testing for diagnosing urinary tract infections. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department has not made a specific assessment. There are several sources of guidance regarding the diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTIs), including from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence and the UK Health Security Agency. The TOUCAN study was part-commissioned by NHS England as an assessment of future more timely diagnostics, including various point of care tests for UTIs in primary care. |
|
Urinary Tract Infections: Vaccination
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to support research on vaccinations against recurrent and chronic urinary tract infections. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department funds research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The NIHR funds, supports, and carries out high-quality research to improve health outcomes and care services. Over the last five financial years, the Department has provided over £22 million in programme research funding for urinary tract infection (UTI) research, including research on improved treatment for recurrent and chronic UTIs. In addition, NIHR infrastructure is supporting Phase 3 trials on vaccines against Escherichia coli infection in older adults who have a history of UTI, delivered by the NIHR Bristol Clinical Research Facility and the NIHR Wellcome Trust Manchester Clinical Research Facility.
The NIHR also funds the James Lind Alliance, which has run a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) focused on chronic and recurrent UTIs. This PSP, funded by AMR Action UK and delivered in partnership with Bladder Health UK and The Urology Foundation, has identified the top 10 research priorities in this area. A rolling funding opportunity is available for research projects that align with priorities aligning with PSPs. |
|
Urinary Tract Infections: Health Services
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of medical (a) gender inequality and (b) misogyny on the (i) diagnostics and (ii) treatment of urinary tract infections. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department has not made a specific assessment. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence’s (NICE) guidelines, such as those for the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections, are subject to equality impact assessments as part of NICE’s governance processes, which mean that protected characteristics, including sex, are considered as part of the guideline's development. |
|
Urinary Tract Infections
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department is taking steps with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to introduce a definition for chronic urinary tract infections. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is the independent body responsible for developing evidence‑based guidance for the National Health Service on best practice in the care and treatment of patients with specific conditions. NICE does not ordinarily define specific clinical conditions. NICE has no current plans to develop guidance on chronic urinary tract infections (UTIs) at this time, and the topic has not been considered by its prioritisation board. However, NICE has produced a clinical guideline on antimicrobial prescribing for recurrent UTIs which provides recommendations on treatments and self-care for the prevention of recurrent UTIs. This guideline is available at the following link: |
|
Diabetes: Health Services
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his department is taking to help ensure the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended diabetes care guidelines are adhered to. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines provide recommendations on best practice in terms of both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions and services. Guidelines describe best practice and National Health Service organisations are expected to take them fully into account in designing services that meet the needs of their local populations. NICE guidance is not mandatory because it is designed as evidence-based advice to inform, rather than replace, clinical judgment, allowing for tailored care for individual patients. Guidelines cannot cover every unique patient scenario, and clinicians must maintain responsibility for treatment decisions. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Science and Technology Facilities Council Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Dame Chi Onwurah (Chair); Dr Allison Gardner; Kit Malthouse; Freddie |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Science and Technology Facilities Council Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Dame Chi Onwurah (Chair); Dr Allison Gardner; Kit Malthouse; Freddie |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026
Oral Evidence - University College London, University of Edinburgh, and Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, University of Durham Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Dame Chi Onwurah (Chair); Dr Allison Gardner; Kit Malthouse; Freddie |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026
Oral Evidence - University College London, University of Edinburgh, and Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, University of Durham Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Dame Chi Onwurah (Chair); Dr Allison Gardner; Kit Malthouse; Freddie |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Cambridge Nucleomics Innovation showcase - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Dame Chi Onwurah (Chair); Dr Allison Gardner; Freddie van Mierlo; |
|
Monday 2nd March 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Google, re: Follow-ups from Committee visit, 3 December 2024 Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Allison Gardner inquired about whether our AI Works program had been used to support |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 11th March 2026 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Social media age restrictions At 9:30am: Oral evidence Frank Young - Chief Executive at Parentkind Dr Rebecca Foljambe - Founder at Health Professionals for Safer Screens and GP Partner At 10:10am: Oral evidence Professor Lorna Woods OBE - Professor Emerita School of Law at University of Essex and advisor to the Online Safety Act Network (OSN) Dr Kim Sylwander - Research Manager and researcher at Digital Futures for Children centre, London School of Economics and Political Science The Baroness Kidron OBE - Crossbench Peer at House of Lords and Founder and Chair of 5Rights At 10:50am: Oral evidence Julie Inman Grant - eSafety Commissioner at Australia Professor Amy Orben - Research Professor and Programme Leader at MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge and Fellow at St. John's College, University of Cambridge Professor Jeff Hancock - Founding Director at Stanford Social Media Lab, Director, Stanford Cyber Policy Centre and Harry and Norman Chandler Professor of Communication View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 18th March 2026 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 1 p.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Science diplomacy At 1:30pm: Oral evidence The Lord Vallance of Balham KCB - Minister for Science, Innovation, Research and Nuclear at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Seema Malhotra MP - Minister for Indo-Pacific at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Rhys Bowen - Director for International and Economic Security at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Nathanael Bevan - Deputy Director of the What Works Research and Evidence at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Follow-up on Social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms inquiry At 9:30am: Oral evidence Wifredo Fernández - Director, Global Government Affairs at X (formerly known as Twitter) Alistair Law - Director of Public Policy, Northern Europe at TikTok Rebecca Stimson - UK Public Policy Director at Meta Zoe Darme - Director for Trust, Knowledge and Information Products at Google View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Mar 2026
Neuroscience and digital childhoods Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Exposure to digital technologies is an everyday experience for children, in how they play, learn, and connect with their families, friends and wider society. This exposure results in a complex picture of benefits and risks related to children’s physical and cognitive development and physical and mental health. There is a lot of data about device use and online habits but how the use of a wide range of digital devices affects development in childhood and adolescence is less clear. The Science, Innovation and Technology Committee is launching an inquiry into neuroscience and digital childhoods to examine the impact of digital devices on brain development, as well as physical impacts, the differences between devices and uses, and the differing impacts on those of different ages and from different backgrounds.
|