Information between 6th September 2025 - 16th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 292 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 278 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 297 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 364 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 300 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 87 |
|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 300 |
|
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 179 |
|
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 116 Noes - 333 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 96 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 404 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 160 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 158 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 402 Noes - 97 |
|
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 398 Noes - 93 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 327 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 333 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 339 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 324 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 319 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 316 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Digital ID
Allison Gardner contributed 1 speech (106 words) Monday 13th October 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Sentencing Bill
Allison Gardner contributed 2 speeches (683 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Housing: North Staffordshire
Allison Gardner contributed 4 speeches (1,681 words) Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Allison Gardner contributed 2 speeches (123 words) Monday 8th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Defence |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Planning Permission
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps her Department is taking to help tackle the use of retrospective planning applications to regularise unauthorised development; and whether she plans to close loopholes that may undermine the effectiveness of local planning enforcement. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Enforcement is at the discretion of local planning authorities. They have a wide range of powers with strong penalties for non-compliance and it is for them to decide how and when they use those powers depending on the circumstances of each case.
The government has no plans to amend local planning authorities’ enforcement powers at this time. We will, however, continue to keep the operation of the enforcement system under review.
With regard to capacity and capability, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to question UIN 67508 on 14 July 2025. |
|
Planning Authorities: Staffordshire
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps her Department is taking to help support local planning authorities to improve the (a) capacity and (b) resourcing of their planning enforcement teams in North Staffordshire. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Enforcement is at the discretion of local planning authorities. They have a wide range of powers with strong penalties for non-compliance and it is for them to decide how and when they use those powers depending on the circumstances of each case.
The government has no plans to amend local planning authorities’ enforcement powers at this time. We will, however, continue to keep the operation of the enforcement system under review.
With regard to capacity and capability, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to question UIN 67508 on 14 July 2025. |
|
Planning Obligations
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps her Department is taking to improve enforcement of agreements under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Enforcement is at the discretion of local planning authorities. They have a wide range of powers with strong penalties for non-compliance and it is for them to decide how and when they use those powers depending on the circumstances of each case.
The government has no plans to amend local planning authorities’ enforcement powers at this time. We will, however, continue to keep the operation of the enforcement system under review.
With regard to capacity and capability, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to question UIN 67508 on 14 July 2025. |
|
Ministry of Justice: Homelessness
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Friday 12th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps her Department is taking as part of its role within the Interministerial Group on Homelessness and Rough Sleeping to reduce and prevent homelessness. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip We are working closely with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) and other Departments through the Inter-Ministerial Group on Homelessness and Rough Sleeping to develop a new long-term cross-government strategy to put us back on track to ending homelessness. We are continuing to expand our Community Accommodation Service 3 (CAS3) to support more prison leavers at risk of homelessness each year. Our CAS3 service supports prison leavers who are subject to probation supervision, by offering up to 12 weeks of basic transitionary accommodation to provide a stable base on release. This programme has been gradually rolled out nationwide since July 2021 and since then has supported over 23,100 prison leavers who would otherwise have been homeless. We have also employed 50 Strategic Housing Specialists to support prisons in their response to reducing homelessness by working in partnership with probation and Local Authorities to identify suitable accommodation for those released to the area, regardless of the prison they are released from. We know that a cross-agency and cross-government approach is required to address the challenge of securing long-term accommodation. That is why we are working closely with MHCLG, health partners and other departments at a national and local level, to address barriers to accommodation for prison leavers, drawing on learning from partnership efforts – including the Changing Futures programme – to take a holistic, trauma-informed approach to supporting individuals with multiple unmet needs. |
|
Housing First
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of implementing an expanded national programme of Housing First to tackle homelessness. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to Question UIN 72851 on 15 September 2025. |
|
Homelessness
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Thursday 11th September 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the reduction in the post-decision move on period on levels of homelessness. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) We closely monitor the impact of all our policies, including the move on period, on the number and occupancy of asylum hotels, the overall costs of the asylum accommodation estate, the wider effect on local communities, and any pressures placed on local authorities and public amenities. We remain committed to working closely with our partners to identify improvements and make efficiencies in supporting newly recognised refugees move on from asylum accommodation. |
|
Semaglutide
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Tuesday 9th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to (a) help tackle illegal sales of semaglutide and (b) regulate unlicensed pharmacists. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible for the regulation of all medicines and medical devices in the UK by ensuring they work and are acceptably safe. This also includes applying the legal controls on the retail sale, supply and advertising of medicines which are set out in the Human Medicines Regulations 2012. Public safety is the number one priority for the MHRA and its Criminal Enforcement Unit (CEU) works hard to prevent, detect and investigate illegal activity involving medicines and medical devices. This year, the CEU and its partners have seized millions of doses of illegally traded medicines, including weight loss products. The MHRA also works closely with web-based sales platforms and the internet industry to identify and remove non-compliant medicines and medical devices where possible. This has included the suspension of hundreds of websites and social media listings linked to the sale of weight loss products over the last two years. The MHRA works tirelessly to develop new and innovative ways to tackle the trade in illegal medicines. This includes: - enhanced collaboration with search engine and UK internet service providers aimed at blocking harmful online content; - boosted collaboration with Home Office Border Force allowing the MHRA to grow its operational footprint at the border and increase the interdiction rates of illegally trafficked medicines; - the launch of an online checker that allows users to search if a website offering medicines has been deemed fraudulent by the MHRA; - implementation of a web-based reporting scheme allowing users to report suspicious websites, online marketplace listings and social media channels directly to the MHRA; and - the use of cutting-edge technology to identify, track and seize the proceeds of crime, including cryptocurrency.
The MHRA’s FakeMeds campaign provides advice to people in the UK who are considering buying medication online, outlining how products can be accessed from safe and legitimate sources. Anyone who believes they have had a side effect from a medicine, or think they’ve received falsified stock, can report it to the MHRA’s Yellow Card scheme. Most legitimate weight loss products are prescription-only medicines, meaning that a consultation with a doctor or qualified healthcare professional is needed to assess the patient's suitability for the treatment and consider any potential risks. Usually, they should only be obtained from a registered pharmacy against a valid prescription. The General Pharmaceutical Council is responsible for the regulation of pharmacies and pharmacists licensed to practice in Great Britain. |
|
Potassium Chloride
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Tuesday 9th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to help improve the supply of liquid potassium chloride. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department is aware of supply issues affecting potassium chloride 375mg/5ml syrup (Kay-Cee-L® syrup). We issued comprehensive communications to healthcare professionals which includes guidance on how to manage affected patients during the shortage. Alternative formulations of potassium effervescent tablets remain available, and the Department has reached out to specialist importers who have sourced unlicensed potassium chloride oral solution for patients. The Department is aware that this product has been divested to another manufacturer. We are working closely with the new manufacturer and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency to expedite regulatory procedures where possible to ensure that supplies of licensed potassium chloride syrup are made available as soon as possible. |
|
Employment Schemes: Publicity
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Tuesday 9th September 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps her Department is taking to increase awareness of (a) Access to Work and (b) other employment support programmes amongst employers. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Employers are crucial in enhancing employment opportunities and supporting disabled people and those with health conditions to thrive in the workforce.
Access to Work aims to support the recruitment and retention of disabled people into employment. It is a personalised discretionary grant that provides support with workplace adjustments beyond an employer’s obligation as outlined in the Equality Act 2010.
As part of our Plan for Change, and as set out in the Pathways to Work Green Paper published in March, we consulted on the future of Access to Work and how to improve the programme to help more disabled people into work and support employers. We will review all aspects of Access to Work after evaluating the findings of the Pathways to Work consultation. The Disability Confident Scheme encourages employers to create disability inclusive workplaces and to support disabled people to get work and get on in work. The scheme covers all disabilities, including hidden disabilities. It provides employers with the knowledge, skills, and confidence they need to attract, recruit, retain and develop disabled people in the workplace and to take positive action to address the issues disabled employees face. We recognise there are opportunities to improve the scheme, and I have been discussing ideas for making the Disability Confident scheme criteria more robust, and officials are continuing to engage with stakeholders to discuss reform proposals.
In addition, DWP has a digital information service for employers, (www.support-with-employee-health-and-disability.dwp.gov.uk), which provides tailored guidance to businesses to support employees to remain in work. This includes guidance on health disclosures and having conversations about health, plus guidance on legal obligations, including statutory sick pay and making reasonable adjustments.
In January this year, we launched an expert academic panel to advise us on boosting neurodiversity awareness and inclusion at work. The panel will consider the reasons why neurodivergent people have poor experiences in the workplace, and a low overall employment rate, making their recommendations later this year.
In our Get Britain Working White Paper, published November 2024, we committed support for employers to recruit, retain and develop staff. As part of that, the Secretaries of State for Work and Pensions and Business and Trade have asked Sir Charlie Mayfield to lead ‘Keep Britain Working’, an independent review to consider how best to support and enable employers to recruit and retain more people with health conditions and disabilities, promote healthy workplaces, and support more people to stay in or return to work from periods of sickness absence. Sir Charlie Mayfield will deliver a final report with recommendations in the autumn.
|
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 15th September Allison Gardner signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 15th September 2025 Award of honorary posthumous England cap to Frank Soo 17 signatures (Most recent: 20 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Daisy Cooper (Liberal Democrat - St Albans) That this House celebrates the award of an honorary posthumous England Cap for Frank Soo by the Football Association, to his family and the Frank Soo Foundation; recognises that Frank Soo was the first player of Asian descent to play for England, making his debut against Wales in 1942, and … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
8 Sep 2025, 2:35 p.m. - House of Commons "now come to questions. The Secretary of State of defence, Doctor Allison Gardner. " Q1. What steps he is taking to increase innovation in the defence sector. (905500) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Housing: North Staffordshire
21 speeches (4,762 words) Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Esther McVey (Con - Tatton) I will call Dr Allison Gardner to move the motion and then I will call the Minister to respond. - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 5th September 2025
Attendance statistics - Members' attendance 2024–25 (Science, Innovation and Technology Committee) Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: 90.0%) George Freeman (Conservative, Mid Norfolk) (added 21 Oct 2024) 14 of 30 (46.7%) Dr Allison Gardner |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 16th September 2025 2 p.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Life sciences investment At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Ben Lucas - VP Managing Director UK and Ireland at MSD Dr Richard Torbett - Chief Executive at ABPI (The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry) Tom Keith-Roach - UK President at AstraZeneca At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Lord Patrick Vallance - Minister for Science, Research and Innovation at DSIT Rosalind Campion - Director at Office for Life Sciences Dr Zubir Ahmed MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 14th October 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Innovation showcase At 9:30am: Oral evidence Dr Sebastian Weidt - Co-Founder and CEO at Universal Quantum At 9:45am: Oral evidence Nick Davies - Programme Director at Institute for Government Jason Liggins - CEO at Crown Hosting Data Centres At 10:30am: Oral evidence Gaia Marcus - Director at Ada Lovelace Institute Jeni Tennison - Executive Director at Connected by Data View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st October 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Innovation showcase At 9:30am: Oral evidence Professor Mahesh Anand - Professor at Planetary Science and Exploration and Director of Research at the School of Physical Sciences, The Open University At 9:45am: Oral evidence John Edwards - Information Commissioner at Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th October 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Life sciences investment At 9:30am: Oral evidence Emily Hyett - Group Product Manager at Yoti At 9:45am: Oral evidence Dr Sam Roberts - Chief Executive at NICE At 10:30am: Oral evidence The Lord Vallance of Balham KCB - Minister for Science, Research and Innovation at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Steve Bates - Executive Chairman at Office for Life Sciences Dr Zubir Ahmed MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at Department of Health and Social Care View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
2 Oct 2025
Life sciences investment Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions With MSD cancelling its £1 billion ongoing manufacturing site in Kings Cross, AstraZeneca pausing its £200 million investment in its Cambridge site, and the latter upgrading its US listing, the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee is launching a call for evidence on UK life sciences competitiveness. This follows an initial emergency session, where it heard from representatives from MSD and AstraZeneca, as well as the ABPI, and from officials and ministers, including Minister for Science, Research and Innovation, Patrick Vallance. The call for written evidence will examine the competitiveness of the UK’s life sciences sector, barriers to innovation for medicines in the UK, issues with pricing uptake and access, and the impact of other countries’ policies. |