Information between 13th March 2024 - 12th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No.2) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 300 |
13 Mar 2024 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 147 |
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No.2) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 43 |
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 41 |
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 292 |
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 293 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 250 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 251 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 251 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 249 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 255 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 252 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 253 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 255 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 250 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 253 |
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 305 |
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 305 |
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 306 |
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 301 |
25 Mar 2024 - Investigatory Powers (Amendment)Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 265 |
25 Mar 2024 - Investigatory Powers (Amendment)Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 39 Noes - 257 |
25 Mar 2024 - Investigatory Powers (Amendment)Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 261 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 265 |
25 Mar 2024 - Investigatory Powers (Amendment)Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Stephen Crabb voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 38 |
Speeches |
---|
Stephen Crabb speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Stephen Crabb contributed 2 speeches (119 words) Tuesday 26th March 2024 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Stephen Crabb speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Stephen Crabb contributed 1 speech (104 words) Tuesday 19th March 2024 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
Stephen Crabb speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Stephen Crabb contributed 1 speech (84 words) Monday 18th March 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
Stephen Crabb speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Stephen Crabb contributed 2 speeches (100 words) Thursday 14th March 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
Stephen Crabb speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Stephen Crabb contributed 2 speeches (82 words) Wednesday 13th March 2024 - Commons Chamber Wales Office |
Written Answers |
---|
UK Emissions Trading Scheme
Asked by: Stephen Crabb (Conservative - Preseli Pembrokeshire) Wednesday 13th March 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he plans to make an assessment of the potential merits of introducing new measures to help support businesses participating in the emissions trading scheme. Answered by Gareth Davies - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government is committed to supporting decarbonisation. That is why it protects sectors included in the Emissions Trading Scheme against carbon leakage by allocating free allowances, with installations vulnerable to carbon leakage receiving up to 100% of their emissions allowances for free based on sector benchmarks. The Government also delivers compensation for the majority of indirect electricity costs imposed by the ETS and CPS on the UK’s most electricity-intensive businesses, through a compensation scheme, which is worth approximately £120 million a year. In addition, the Government offers a range of support schemes for industry to decarbonise, such as the Industrial Energy Transformation Fund (IETF), which supports industrial sites with high energy use to transition to a low carbon future. Applications for phase 3 of the Fund, which is worth £185m, were launched in January 2024. Lastly, at Spring Budget 2023, the Chancellor announced an unprecedented up to £20 billion for the early development of CCUS to help meet the Government’s climate commitments. |
UK Emissions Trading Scheme
Asked by: Stephen Crabb (Conservative - Preseli Pembrokeshire) Wednesday 13th March 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he plans to make an assessment of the potential merits of providing relief from the emissions trading scheme to businesses that export products to external markets. Answered by Gareth Davies - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The UK is a world leader on carbon pricing. That is why we have an ambitious carbon pricing system, which ensures that polluters pay for their emissions. Those businesses are protected from carbon leakage in the form of free allowances under the Emissions Trading Scheme, and from 2027, some UK sectors will be protected from carbon leakage by a UK CBAM. The CBAM is a charge on imports and is unlikely to be a suitable tool to address the carbon leakage risk related to exported goods. The government will continue to assess the impact of carbon pricing on carbon leakage risk for UK industry, including for businesses that export products abroad. |
Carbon Emissions
Asked by: Stephen Crabb (Conservative - Preseli Pembrokeshire) Wednesday 13th March 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he plans to undertake a review of the criteria used to determine which industries are included in its carbon border adjustment mechanism proposals. Answered by Gareth Davies - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The government will implement a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) from 1 January 2027 to ensure that UK decarbonisation efforts lead to a true reduction in global emissions. The CBAM will apply a carbon price to relevant imported goods at risk of carbon leakage from the following sectors: aluminium, cement, ceramics, fertiliser, glass, hydrogen, iron & steel. In making the decision around the initial sectoral scope of the UK CBAM, the government looked primarily at three factors: inclusion in the UK ETS as the purpose of the CBAM is to ensure a comparable treatment of imported goods and domestic products from a carbon pricing perspective, carbon leakage risk, and feasibility and effectiveness. The scope of the UK CBAM will be kept under review. Further details on the design and delivery of a UK CBAM, including the precise list of products in scope within the announced sectors, will be the subject of consultation in 2024. |
Armed Forces
Asked by: Stephen Crabb (Conservative - Preseli Pembrokeshire) Monday 25th March 2024 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department is taking to recruit armed forces personnel. Answered by Andrew Murrison - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) In a challenging labour market, we continue to apply an array of measures to support recruitment and retention and refine the Armed Forces’ offer including last year with the largest pay increase for more than two decades. Haythornthwaite Review teams have been stood up across Defence to implement all of Rick Haythornthwaite’s 67 recommendations, working to establish a reward and incentivisation architecture that will attract and retain the skills we need in the years ahead. |
Bill Documents |
---|
Mar. 27 2024
Notices of Amendments as at 27 March 2024 Criminal Justice Bill 2023-24 Amendment Paper Found: Rosindell Sir Iain Duncan Smith Rachael Maskell Nickie Aiken Mrs Flick Drummond Jo Gideon Stephen |
Mar. 26 2024
Notices of Amendments as at 26 March 2024 Criminal Justice Bill 2023-24 Amendment Paper Found: Rosindell Sir Iain Duncan Smith Rachael Maskell Nickie Aiken Mrs Flick Drummond Jo Gideon Stephen |
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 1st May 2024 9:15 a.m. Welsh Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Defence industry in Wales At 9:30am: Oral evidence Jeremy Miles MS - Cabinet Secretary for Economy, Energy and Welsh Language at Welsh Government View calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
27 Mar 2024
Access to High Street Banking in Wales Welsh Affairs Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 8 May 2024) In Wales, the number of bank and building society branches fell from 695 in 2012 to just 435 in 2022, and already 22 high street bank branch closures have been announced for 2024. This inquiry will explore the future provision of high street banking, which groups are most adversely affected by branch closures, and whether alternatives to traditional bank branches can mitigate the negative consequences of branches closing. The Committee is inviting written submissions by May 8 2024. These should focus on, but are not limited to:
|