Sarah Olney Portrait

Sarah Olney

Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park

17,155 (33.3%) majority - 2024 General Election

First elected: 12th December 2019

Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Cabinet Office)

(since September 2024)

Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
15th Jan 2025 - 25th Mar 2025
Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy)
6th Jan 2020 - 18th Sep 2024
Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Treasury)
11th Jul 2022 - 18th Sep 2024
Public Accounts Committee
2nd Mar 2020 - 30th May 2024
Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Transport)
7th Sep 2020 - 10th Jul 2022
Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (International Trade)
6th Jan 2020 - 7th Sep 2020


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Sarah Olney has voted in 216 divisions, and 92 times against the majority of their Party.

29 Nov 2024 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 61 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 275
26 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 15 Noes - 8
26 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
26 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 14
26 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
12 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
12 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
12 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
12 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
11 Feb 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventeenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 12
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventeenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 16
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventeenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 14
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventeenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 14
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventeenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 14
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 13
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 13
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 13
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 13
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 13
4 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 13
5 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Nineteeth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 13
5 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eighteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 19
5 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eighteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 14
5 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eighteenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 13
5 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Nineteeth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 15
5 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Nineteeth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 14
5 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Nineteeth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 18
11 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 19 Noes - 3
11 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 14
11 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 13
11 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 13
11 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 15
11 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twentieth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 15
12 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 15
18 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 15
18 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 15
18 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 15
18 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 16
18 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 12
18 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 15
18 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 14
18 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 13
19 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-seventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 17
19 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-seventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 17
19 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-seventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 17
19 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-seventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 17
19 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-seventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 13
19 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-seventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 19
19 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-seventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 18
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 19 Noes - 3
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 13
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 14 Noes - 8
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 14
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 14
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 20
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 15 Noes - 8
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 20
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 20
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 14
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 15 Noes - 8
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 20 Noes - 3
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 20
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 15 Noes - 8
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 15 Noes - 8
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 15 Noes - 8
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 14
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 14
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 16 Noes - 7
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 15 Noes - 8
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 14
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 20
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 20
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
25 Mar 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Sarah Olney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 15
View All Sarah Olney Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Simon Opher (Labour)
(17 debate interactions)
Lindsay Hoyle (Speaker)
(15 debate interactions)
Danny Kruger (Conservative)
Shadow Minister (Work and Pensions)
(14 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Ministry of Justice
(73 debate contributions)
Cabinet Office
(50 debate contributions)
Department of Health and Social Care
(26 debate contributions)
HM Treasury
(20 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Sarah Olney's debates

Richmond Park Petitions

e-Petitions are administered by Parliament and allow members of the public to express support for a particular issue.

If an e-petition reaches 10,000 signatures the Government will issue a written response.

If an e-petition reaches 100,000 signatures the petition becomes eligible for a Parliamentary debate (usually Monday 4.30pm in Westminster Hall).

Petition Debates Contributed

I believe joining the EU would boost the economy, increase global influence, improve collaboration and provide stability & freedom. I believe that Brexit hasn't brought any tangible benefit and there is no future prospect of any, that the UK has changed its mind and that this should be recognised.


Latest EDMs signed by Sarah Olney

24th April 2025
Sarah Olney signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 28th April 2025

Travel-related restrictions and haemoglobin tests for blood donations

Tabled by: Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour - Clapham and Brixton Hill)
That this House celebrates the opening of the new Brixton Blood Donation Centre, which has welcomed over 3,700 donors in its first three months of operation, including more than 1,000 first-time donors and 10 per cent identifying as Black; recognises this as a promising step towards improving the diversity of …
8 signatures
(Most recent: 28 Apr 2025)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 5
Independent: 2
Liberal Democrat: 1
24th March 2025
Sarah Olney signed this EDM on Thursday 24th April 2025

Ensuring stability for Ukrainian refugees in the UK

Tabled by: Pippa Heylings (Liberal Democrat - South Cambridgeshire)
That this House believes that Ukrainian refugees fleeing war must be treated with compassion in the UK; recognises that the war in Ukraine still wages on, more than three years after Putin first invaded; notes with concern recent reports that some Ukrainian refugees have faced losing their homes and jobs …
68 signatures
(Most recent: 30 Apr 2025)
Signatures by party:
Liberal Democrat: 45
Labour: 10
Plaid Cymru: 4
Scottish National Party: 4
Green Party: 3
Democratic Unionist Party: 1
Social Democratic & Labour Party: 1
Conservative: 1
View All Sarah Olney's signed Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Sarah Olney, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


Sarah Olney has not been granted any Urgent Questions

1 Adjournment Debate led by Sarah Olney

Thursday 14th November 2024

7 Bills introduced by Sarah Olney


A Bill to make provision to increase the energy performance of buildings; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 24th March 2023
(Read Debate)

A Bill to require the Secretary of State to review the effectiveness of gender pay gap reporting requirements.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 6th May 2022

A Bill to prohibit the use of upward-only rent review clauses in commercial rent agreements; to nullify existing such clauses; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 6th May 2022

A Bill to introduce a system of proportional representation for parliamentary elections and for local government elections in England; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Tuesday 3rd December 2024
(Read Debate)
Next Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 11th July 2025
Order Paper number: 23
(Unlikely to be Debated - would require unanimous consent to progress)

A Bill to require the Secretary of State to apply for an order for special administration in relation to Thames Water; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Monday 22nd April 2024

A Bill to require the Secretary of State to report to Parliament on the merits of prohibiting scheduled flights from landing or taking off between the hours of 11 pm and 6 am.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Monday 15th January 2024

A Bill to prohibit anti-abortion protests within 150 metres of abortion clinics; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Wednesday 11th March 2020

Latest 50 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
5 Other Department Questions
9th Oct 2024
To ask the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, representing the House of Commons Commission, if the Commission will publish a list of (a) civil servants and (b) special advisers who have a parliamentary pass.

We are unable to provide this information, as the pass issuing system does not categorise passholders in this way. Special advisers are not a specific category of passholder, and therefore this information could not easily be obtained from the pass data system. In any event, it would be inconsistent with data protection principles to publish such a list.

It would not be appropriate to publish the personal data collected for the purposes of security pass allocation as this would not be consistent with data protection principles, therefore we are unable to provide a list of civil servants holding passes. As noted above, it would be inconsistent with data protection principles to publish personal data collected for security purposes in this way, and therefore the Commission is unable to provide such a list.

9th Oct 2024
To ask the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, representing the House of Commons Commission, if the Commission will publish a list of special advisers who have had a parliamentary pass in each of the last five financial years.

We are unable to provide this information, as the pass issuing system does not categorise passholders in this way. Special advisers are not a specific category of passholder, and therefore this information could not easily be obtained from the pass data system. In any event, it would be inconsistent with data protection principles to publish such a list.

It would not be appropriate to publish the personal data collected for the purposes of security pass allocation as this would not be consistent with data protection principles, therefore we are unable to provide a list of civil servants holding passes. As noted above, it would be inconsistent with data protection principles to publish personal data collected for security purposes in this way, and therefore the Commission is unable to provide such a list.

9th Oct 2024
To ask the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, representing the House of Commons Commission, how many parliamentary passes were (a) lost and (b) stolen in each of the last five financial years.

The database is a live pass issuing system and does not retain full historical information as data is only retained for three years or less depending on the pass category, so is continually being deleted in line with our records retention policy. The following figures show the number of passes reported as lost or stolen by financial year; however please note all these passes were promptly deactivated and would not allow access to the Parliamentary estate.

Financial year 2021–2022: 43

Financial year 2022–2023: 76

Financial year 2023–2024: 62

9th Oct 2024
To ask the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, representing the House of Commons Commission, how many parliamentary passes were not returned following the conclusion of the holder's employment in each of the last five financial years.

The database is a live pass issuing system and does not retain full historical information as data is only retained for three years or less depending on the pass category, so is continually being deleted in line with our records retention policy.

The vast majority of passes are returned promptly after they expire or are invalidated. The following figures show the number of expired passes not returned by financial year; however please note all these passes were deactivated and would not allow access to the Parliamentary estate.

Financial year 2021–2022: 513

Financial year 2022–2023: 432

Financial year 2023–2024: 392

9th Oct 2024
To ask the hon. Member representing the House of Commons Commission, representing the House of Commons Commission, how many holders of each pass type have access to the parliamentary estate.

The number of passes on issue changes constantly, so the following represents a snapshot of data recorded on 10 October 2024:

  • MPs: 648
  • Peers: 832
  • MPs’ staff: 1,589
  • Peers’ staff: 333
  • Staff of the Administrations - House of Commons, House of Lords, and Parliamentary Digital Service: 4,242
  • Metropolitan Police staff including police officers: 565
  • Contractors: 3,028 (blue) + 1,170 (yellow) = 4,198
  • Former MPs: 419
  • Retired Peers: 55
  • Political parties and whips: 181
  • Partners of MPs/Peers and residents: 680
  • Civil servants: 1,515
  • Media: 472
  • Restoration & Renewal Management: 189
24th Feb 2025
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps his Department is taking to remove barriers to young people in the UK wishing to study and work in the EU.

The Government recognises the value to young people of the opportunity to experience different cultures and work or study elsewhere. UK nationals can travel visa-free to the EU, for example for short-term study, for up to 90 days in a rolling 180-day period. If travelling for the purposes of work, they may need permission from the relevant Member State.The Government introduced the Turing Scheme in 2021, which provides grants for students to study and work anywhere in the world, including Europe, supporting tens of thousands of UK students since its launch.

Nick Thomas-Symonds
Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office
28th Jan 2025
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what progress his Department has made on the review to look at government wide reform at a local level led by the Parliamentary Secretary.

The Government is committed to reforming the state to deliver better public services which revolve around the needs of the users. At the heart of those reforms is a place-based approach. A significant programme of work is underway with departments, local authorities, leaders, frontline staff and others to strengthen and embed this way of working across government.

The work underway includes the £100 million Public Service Reform and Innovation Fund, which will be deploying Test and Learns teams around the country over the next three years to design and test innovative solutions to our biggest public service challenges in partnership with local places – and ensuring that local learning informs national policy decisions.

The Government will also use the significant opportunity presented by the Spending Review to reform our public services.

Georgia Gould
Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet Office)
13th Jan 2025
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps his Department is taking to help ensure the security of domestic elections from foreign interference.

Protecting the UK and our democratic processes from foreign interference is a priority for this Government and we have a number of mechanisms in place to do this.

The National Security Act 2023 provides the security services and law enforcement agencies with the tools they need to deter, detect, and disrupt state threats.

The Joint Election Security and Preparedness Unit (JESP) works between the Cabinet Office and the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG) to coordinate election security and preparedness activity within government and externally. This includes working with the devolved administrations, local authorities and the Electoral Commission.

The Government's Defending Democracy Taskforce, chaired by the Security Minister, is focused on safeguarding our democracy from the full range of threats including foreign interference.

The Government has also committed to enhancing the safeguards against foreign funding of election campaigns and will be bringing forward proposals in due course.

Abena Oppong-Asare
Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet Office)
13th Jan 2025
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps his Department is taking to help reduce trade barriers with the EU.

The Government is committed to resetting our EU relationship, including by reducing barriers to trade. We will seek a sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) agreement to reduce unnecessary border checks and mutual recognition for professional qualifications, as well as helping our touring artists. We look forward to exploring these issues with our partners in the EU.

Nick Thomas-Symonds
Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office
13th Jan 2025
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will have discussions with Cabinet colleagues on the potential merits of a youth mobility system between the United Kingdom and European Union.

The Government set out clear priorities for the reset with the EU in the manifesto. There are no plans for a Youth Mobility Scheme

Nick Thomas-Symonds
Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office
22nd Apr 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to improve trading relations with Albania.

Total trade in goods and services between the UK and Albania was worth £358 million in 2024, an increase of 11% or £35 million in current prices from 2023.

DBT actively works to resolve barriers to trade affecting companies exporting to Albania, and our trade relationship is underpinned by the Partnership, Trade and Cooperation Agreement (PTCA), signed in 2021. This agreement offers generous trade preferences and places a strong emphasis on cooperation across key trade themes that are common to major trade agreements. We look forward to convening the next PTCA Joint Committee in the near future.

Douglas Alexander
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
17th Apr 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will make his policy to require venture capital firms to (a) record and (b) publish the diversity of founders receiving investment.

The Department is working to improve access to finance for diverse founders. An example of one initiative is the Investing in Women Code.

It was established in 2019 as a recommendation of the Alison Rose Review to increase transparency and data reporting on gender in the investment landscape. It is a commitment to support the advancement of women entrepreneurs in the UK by improving their access to the tools, resources and finance they need to achieve their goals. Signatories to the Code are voluntary, and data is published on an annual basis on the GOV.UK website.

In February 2025, a roundtable discussion was held with the finance industry, including Venture Capital representatives, to address access to finance issues for ethnic minority founders. We are exploring how best to gather and monitor the impact of having better ethnicity data.

Sarah Jones
Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)
17th Apr 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to help increase representation of (a) women and (b) minority ethnic founders in venture capital funding.

The Department leads on the Invest in Women Taskforce (IWT) and the Investing in Women Code (IWC). In November, the IWT launched a £255 million fund for female entrepreneurs, which will be invested through female investors in the UK, including backing female emerging fund managers. Signatories to the IWC diversify their investment committees and decision makers, recognising diverse leaders make better decisions.

In February 2025, a roundtable discussion was held with the finance industry, including Venture Capital representatives, to address access to finance issues for ethnic minority founders.

We have also launched a Call for Evidence on Small Business Access to Finance to help inform government policy and initiatives, which includes a specific focus on underserved entrepreneurs.

Gareth Thomas
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)
17th Apr 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on support to improve the investment readiness of (a) women and (b) BAME entrepreneurs.

The government backed Invest in Women Taskforce aims to make the UK the best place in the world to be a female entrepreneur. To improve investment readiness, it seeks to break down barriers such as lack of mentorship, resource and networks for aspiring women-led businesses. In 2024, our Venture Capital Unit launched a Female Founders Cohort initiative to support women-led businesses raise funds from international venture capital investors.

In February 2025, a roundtable discussion was held with ethnic minority businesses (EMB) and the financial services sector to discuss challenges in accessing finance, as well as how we can better engage and support EMB founders.

We have also launched a Call for Evidence on Small Business Access to Finance to help inform government policy and initiatives, which includes a specific focus on underserved entrepreneurs.

Gareth Thomas
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)
19th Mar 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, with reference to the Prime Minister's Oral Statement of 25 February 2025 on Defence and Security, Official Report, columns 361-364, if he will make an assessment of the potential impact of reducing Official Development Assistance funding as a proportion of Gross National Income on UK businesses.

The Prime Minister has set out a new strategic vision for government spending on defence and security, and official development assistance.

Decisions on how the ODA budget will be used will be worked through as part of the ongoing Spending Review and resource allocation processes, based on various factors including impact assessments.

Douglas Alexander
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
22nd Apr 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, whether she has had recent discussions with relevant stakeholders on the safety of rehydration clauses in combat sports.

I have not had any recent discussions with stakeholders about the safety of rehydration clauses in combat sports. It is the responsibility of individual sports and event organisers to determine the appropriate measures to ensure the safety of participants.

Stephanie Peacock
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)
25th Feb 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what discussions she has had with the Secretary of State for the Home Department on the potential impact of proposed cuts to the Parks Police on ensuring the protection of the (a) nature and (b) environment of Royal Parks.

The Royal Parks are Crown Land managed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport by The Royal Parks Charity. The policing of the parks is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police Service, who are in regular contact with The Royal Parks Charity. No discussions have been held between the Home Secretary and Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport regarding this matter.

As the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs is not responsible for the Royal Parks, it is also assumed that no discussions have been held between that Secretary of State and the Home Secretary.

Chris Bryant
Minister of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)
25th Feb 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the threshold level for eligibility for (a) 30 hours of free childcare and (b) tax-free childcare on working parents who earn between £100,000 and £125,000.

The government is committed to delivering the expansion of the 30 hours free childcare offer so that from September 2025 eligible working parents in England will be able to access 30 hours of free childcare per week, over 38 weeks of the year, from the term after their child turns 9 months old to when they start school. Accessible and high-quality early education and childcare is a crucial part of giving every child the best start in life, boosting children’s life chances and giving parents work choices.

To be eligible for the working parent entitlement, parents will each need to earn the equivalent of 16 hours a week at National Minimum Wage (£9,518 per year) and less than £100,000 adjusted net income per year. This offer aims to support parents to return to work or to work more hours, if they wish. The income eligibility criteria are the same for Tax-Free Childcare.

The £100,000 level was chosen to correspond with Income Tax thresholds and be easily understandable for parents, and only a very small proportion of parents (3.8% of parents of 3 and 4-year-olds in 2023/24) earn over the £100,000 adjusted net income maximum threshold. There are no current plans to change the income threshold for the working parent entitlement or Tax-Free Childcare.

The government is committed to managing public finances in a responsible way by targeting support with childcare towards those who need it the most in order to work. These are the parents for whom childcare support makes a bigger difference to their ability to work, given that childcare costs make up a bigger proportion of their earnings.

However, the universal 15 hours of free childcare offer remains in place for all parents of 3 and 4-year-olds, regardless of parental circumstances, including those who earn over £100,000.

Parents can find out about the government-funded support they are eligible for via the Childcare Choices website: https://www.childcarechoices.gov.uk/.

Stephen Morgan
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)
13th Jan 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she has had discussions with Cabinet colleagues on steps to increase democratic education.

For secondary schools, democracy is currently taught through the national curriculum for citizenship at key stages 3 and 4, which covers parliamentary democracy, the key elements of the constitution of the United Kingdom, the power of government and how citizens and Parliament hold it to account. Primary schools can choose to teach citizenship, using non-statutory programmes of study at key stages 1 and 2.

Support for curriculum delivery is available through optional, free and adaptable resources from Oak National Academy (Oak). Oak launched its new curriculum sequences for secondary citizenship earlier this academic year, with the full package of curriculum resources expected to be available by autumn 2025. Oak resources are available here: https://www.thenational.academy/.

The UK Parliament runs educational tours for pupils, youth and community groups to see how Parliament works in action and produces free resources.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport funds the UK Youth Parliament (UKYP) to support young people to engage in the democratic process. Every two years, the UKYP runs ‘Make Your Mark,’ a youth vote open to all 11 to 18 year-olds in the UK, for them to be able to vote on what are the most important issues for young people.

The government has established an independent Curriculum and Assessment Review, conducted by a group of education leaders and chaired by Professor Becky Francis CBE. The terms of reference were published last July and can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/curriculum-and-assessment-review.

The review group will publish an interim report in early spring setting out its interim findings and confirm key areas for further work. Its final report, with recommendations, will be published this autumn. The department will take decisions on what changes to make in light of these recommendations.

Catherine McKinnell
Minister of State (Education)
5th Feb 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 14 January 2025 to Question 21168 on Amazonia: Rainforests, if he will provide a breakdown of the funding to the Andes-Amazon Biodiverse Landscape Fund.

The UK funded Biodiverse Landscapes Fund supports developing countries to fight poverty, protect nature, and tackle climate change in six landscapes, spanning 18 countries. In the Andes Amazon landscape, covering parts of Ecuador and Peru, the £12.3 million funding will be targeted to deliver three aims including: strengthening Indigenous Peoples and local community organisations; developing bio-business value chains that drive nature-friendly economic growth; and improving the connectivity and quality of conserved areas. Implementation is through a consortium of international and national organisations led by the global development charity Practical Action, selected through a competitive bid exercise, working in partnerships with the Governments of Ecuador and Peru. It is not possible to give a full breakdown of funding per activity at this stage as this will change over the course of delivering the seven-year programme.

Mary Creagh
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
14th Oct 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will publish the Environment Agency’s modelling of average (a) daily and (b) monthly volumetric river flow rates for each gauging station on the Thames from Reading to Kingston for drought events that are (i) 1 in 100, (ii) 1 in 200 and (iii) 1 in 500 years.

The Environment Agency (EA) does not model flow at gauging stations using drought event return periods. The modelling of flow under a range of climate scenarios is carried out as part of planning by water companies to assess how resilient their supply systems are to droughts. This assessment is set out in their statutory Water Resources Management Plans (WRMP) and Drought Plans.

Thames Water have worked with Water Resources South East (WRSE) regional group to model flow under a range of climate scenarios as a component of regional system simulation modelling which informs their WRMP.

The EA is a statutory consultee for water company WRMPs and reviews the technical analysis undertaken by water companies showing how secure supplies are now (known as the baseline) and what actions are needed to ensure secure supplies in the future.

The EA has reviewed Thames Water’s latest draft WRMP and is satisfied with the company’s evidence provided alongside its latest draft WRMP.

I attended the National Drought Group meeting earlier this month on Wednesday 16 October 2024 where I outlined the pressure climate change is having on our water system and that we need to be prepared for all eventualities. This Government is taking decisive action to improve the resilience of our precious water supplies.

For more information on water resource system modelling completed on behalf of Thames Water see the following links:

wrse-hydrological-modelling-method-statement-november-2022.pdf

method-statement-regional-simulation-model-aug-2021.pdf.

Emma Hardy
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
14th Oct 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will publish the Environment Agency’s modelling of the average (a) daily and (b) monthly percentage of (i) usable and (ii) deployable capacity in each of the (A) Lower Lee Group and (B) Lower Thames Group reservoirs for drought events that are (1) 1 in 100, (2) 1 in 200 and (3) 1 in 500 years.

The Environment Agency (EA) does not model how resilient water company owned supply systems are to drought. It is the responsibility of the water companies to ensure that their systems can deliver secure water supplies for customers whilst ensuring they meet their environmental obligations and legal requirements during a drought.

Every 5 years, water companies are required to evidence in their statutory Water Resources Management Plans (WRMP) how they will ensure secure supplies for the next 25 years. This includes consideration of resilience to extreme droughts, population growth, climate change and environmental water needs.

The EA is a statutory consultee for water company WRMPs and reviews the technical analysis undertaken by water companies showing how secure supplies are now (known as the baseline) and what actions are needed to ensure secure supplies in the future. The EA has reviewed Thames Water’s latest draft WRMP and is satisfied with the company’s evidence provided alongside its latest draft WRMP.

I attended the National Drought Group meeting earlier this month on Wednesday 16 October 2024 where I outlined the pressure climate change is having on our water system and that we need to be prepared for all eventualities. This Government is taking decisive action to improve the resilience of our precious water supplies.

For more information on water resource system modelling completed on behalf of Thames Water see the following links:

Library | WRSE - Water Resource South East

method-statement-regional-simulation-model-aug-2021.pdf (wrse.org.uk)

Emma Hardy
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
10th Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what estimate his Department has made of volumetric river flow rates corresponding to the locations of each gauging station on the Thames from Reading to Kingston.

The Environment Agency operates six river flow gauging stations on the River Thames between Reading and Kingston. These are located at Reading, Maidenhead, Windsor, Staines, Walton and Kingston. The recent daily mean flow at these sites on 11 September 2024 ranged from 12.0 to 28.7 cubic metres per second (m3/s).

River level and flow data can be found via the GOV.UK website: https://environment.data.gov.uk/hydrology.

Emma Hardy
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
10th Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will make an estimate of the expected reservoir levels for each Lower Thames reservoir for drought events (a) 1:100 years, (b) 1:200 years and (c) 1:500 years.

Public water supply reservoirs are the responsibility of the water companies. The Government has not made such estimates; however we are committed to improving water resilience and we are closely monitoring the delivery of their water resources management plans. Their plans set out how they will continue to provide secure water supplies in the long term.

Emma Hardy
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
2nd Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of introducing of mandatory quaternary water treatment of wastewater.

Defra currently has no plans to introduce and make quaternary treatment mandatory for domestic wastewater treatment. Where it is deemed necessary as an additional wastewater treatment process, costs and benefits will be assessed, and stakeholder consultations will be performed through the normal routes.

Emma Hardy
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
2nd Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will make an assessment of the potential impact of the Teddington Direct River Abstraction project on water quality in its vicinity; and if he will take steps to ensure the adequacy of water quality for swimming in that area.

Teddington Direct River Abstraction (DRA) is a water recycling scheme considered in Thames Water’s draft Water Resources Management Plan 2024 (dWRMP24) and Water Resources South East’s (WRSE) Regional Plan as a supply option for 2030/31.

The Environment Agency has scrutinised WRSE’s plan and has responded to Thames Water’s DWRMP24. Any scheme developed will have to meet environmental requirements. The scheme will need environmental permits that the Environment Agency regulate, and planning consents where the Environment Agency is a statutory consultee.

For Teddington DRA proposal to be taken forward Thames Water will be required to obtain an abstraction license and permit to discharge from the Environment Agency. These set out the conditions under which abstraction is authorised to take place and the standards to which the discharged effluent must be treated, ensuring it is treated to a high standard to meet environmental quality standards and ensure water quality in the Thames does not deteriorate. Thames Water will need to ensure any tertiary water treatment for Teddington DRA meets those regulatory requirements and the Environment Agency will regularly inspect Thames Water to ensure that permit standards are met.

Emma Hardy
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
26th Feb 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent discussions has she had with the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care on the potential impact of living under a flight path on people's (a) health and (b) wellbeing.

My Department seeks to minimise the impact of aviation on people’s health and wellbeing, in the context of other government priorities. My officials are in regular contact on this issue with other government departments and their agencies, including the Department of Health and Social Care sponsored UK Health Security Agency.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
21st Feb 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of First Generation Sustainable Aviation Fuels on the environment.

Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is one of the key measures required to decarbonise aviation. The SAF Mandate could deliver up to 6.3 million tonnes of carbon savings per year by 2040.

The SAF Mandate encourages a diverse range of feedstocks and technologies. It also has strict sustainability criteria that SAF must meet to be eligible. SAF must be made from sustainable wastes or residues (such as used cooking oil or forestry residues), recycled carbon fuels (such as unrecyclable plastics), or power to liquid fuels made using low carbon (renewable or nuclear) electricity. This prevents negative environmental consequences such as the loss of biodiversity, deforestation and the clearance of land with high carbon stock (e.g. peatland) that could be associated with the cultivation of raw materials used in SAF production.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
5th Dec 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether it her policy that the proposed UKADS will assess the (a) environmental and (b) health impacts of new flight paths.

The proposed UK Airspace Design Service (UKADS) will be focused on delivering holistic and modernised airspace design for the UK.

As is currently the case, the UKADS would still be required to follow the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA’s) CAP1616 Airspace Change Proposal (ACP) process. CAP1616 sets out how sponsors of airspace change must undertake full, comprehensive environmental assessments for airspace options which are under consideration.

All ACPs must also allow for sufficient consultation to take place with those potentially affected by the proposed changes.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
25th Nov 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking to help tackle the practice of reselling driving test slots.

To ensure fairness for everyone wanting to book a practical driving test, the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) continues to work hard to combat the unscrupulous practice of reselling tests.

DVSA deploys enhanced bot protection on its public facing booking system to stop automated systems from buying up tests unfairly. These applications, however, are constantly evolving and changing and DVSA continues to take steps to block cancellation services from accessing the booking system.

DVSA operates an online booking service (OBS) for Approved Driving Instructors (ADIs) and trainers so that they can book and manage driving and riding tests for their pupils. DVSA has made changes to the OBS by stopping automatic online registrations to use the service, ensuring each company that registers employs an ADI and removing access for any companies not linked to driving instructors.

In January 2023, DVSA changed its booking service terms and conditions to help prevent anyone from selling tests at profit. Since then, the DVSA has issued 327 warnings, 779 suspensions, and closed 727 business accounts for misuse of its booking service.

Lilian Greenwood
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
24th Oct 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the consultation entitled Creating a UK Airspace Design Service (UKADS), published on 22 October 2024, what steps she plans to take to allow communities to provide comments to the proposed UKADS on new flight path systems.

As a public consultation, any interested party is welcome to provide feedback on our proposals to set up a UK Airspace Design Service (UKADS).

The CAA’s Airspace Change Process (CAP1616) sets out how airspace change proposals should be developed and delivered. It includes requirements for the airspace change sponsor to consult those affected by airspace change at different stages of the process and consider their views. The UKADS consultation envisages that once up and running, the UKADS and partner airports would continue to engage and consult with communities on airspace change proposals through a defined process.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
24th Oct 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to her Department's consultation entitled, Creating a UK Airspace Design Service, published on 22 October 2024, whether the service will be staffed from existing Departmental staff.

The consultation published on 22 October outlines our proposals to set up a UK Airspace Design Service (UKADS), initially undertaken by NATS (En Route) plc (NERL) through a change to its air traffic services licence. NERL is independent and not resourced from existing Departmental staff.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
9th Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will publish the memorandum of understanding between (a) her Department, (b) Transport for London and (c) the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham on the cost of the Hammersmith Bridge repairs.

A Memorandum of Understanding on the split of responsibilities for the repair of Hammersmith Bridge was drafted but not agreed in 2021. However, the Department has continued to work productively with both LBHF and TfL and has contributed almost £13m towards the Hammersmith Bridge restoration project to-date. A reconvened Hammersmith Bridge Taskforce is currently being organised, which will help to move this project forward.

Simon Lightwood
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
3rd Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has made an estimate of the potential cost to the public purse of replacing Hammersmith Bridge with a new structure.

Hammersmith Bridge is protected by Historic England. It is a Grade II Listed heritage asset, as it is a 'particularly important' national structure of 'more than special interest'.

The Department has not made any estimates of the cost of replacing the structure as the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is the asset owner and project lead for the Hammersmith Bridge Restoration Project. The Borough has estimated that the cost of dismantling the current bridge and building a new bridge would be significantly more than the repair of the current bridge.

Simon Lightwood
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
3rd Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department plans to fund one third of the cost of the Hammersmith Bridge strengthening works.

The Department will be exploring funding options for a suite of transport related projects at the Spring Spending Review, including the Hammersmith Bridge strengthening works.

Simon Lightwood
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
2nd Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she plans to review the Airports National Policy Statement.

As required by the Planning Act 2008, the Secretary of State will review a National Policy Statement when she considers it appropriate to do so.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
2nd Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential (a) economic, (b) environmental and (c) health impact of a third runway at Heathrow.

An Appraisal of Sustainability and economic assessment were conducted before the Airports National Policy Statement was voted on by Parliament and designated in 2018.

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/heathrow-airport-expansion#appraisal-of-sustainability-and-supporting-documents

Heathrow Airport Limited will need to provide an assessment of the impacts of any proposed scheme for a third runway, and provide suitable mitigations, as part of any Development Consent Order application. The Government would carefully consider any such application in line with the relevant policies and planning processes.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
2nd Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the status is of the Aviation Night Noise Effects (ANNE) study, funded by her Department.

The Aviation Night Noise Effects (ANNE) study is a current study examining the relationship of aviation noise on sleep disturbance and annoyance, and how this varies by different times of night. The study is funded by the Department for Transport and is a collaboration between St George’s, University of London, NatCen Social Research, Noise Consultants Limited, and the University of Pennsylvania. The final results of the ANNE study are expected to be published in Autumn 2026.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
24th Jul 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what guidance her Department provides on whether Heathrow Airport is legally required to support (a) noise abatement schemes, (b) sound insulation and (c) double glazing for properties affected by aircraft noise from that airport.

Heathrow Airport is a designated aerodrome under Section 78 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982, for the purpose of limiting, or of mitigating the effect of, noise and vibration connected with the taking-off or landing of aircraft. Noise abatement procedures for Heathrow Airport, specified by the Secretary of State, are set out in the airport’s Aeronautical Information Publication.

Existing policy on noise insulation, which would incorporate sound insulation and double glazing, is set out in the Aviation Policy Framework 2013 and in the 2017 Airspace policy consultation response.

Mike Kane
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
18th Mar 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average wait time is for a Work Capability Assessment reassessment when a claimant reports improved health.

The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.

ESA clearance times for initial claims only are reported via Stat-Xplore and UC WCA clearance times are planned to be released under Phase 4 of the Universal Credit WCA statistics: release strategy - GOV.UK

Stephen Timms
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
18th Mar 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average wait time is for a Work Capability Assessment reassessment when a claimant reports improved health in South West London.

The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.

ESA clearance times for initial claims only are reported via Stat-Xplore and UC WCA clearance times are planned to be released under Phase 4 of the UC WCA Release Strategy.

Stephen Timms
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
18th Mar 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average wait time is for a PIP reassessment when a claimant reports improved health in South West London.

The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.

PIP clearance times for New Claims and Reassessments can be found in the latest Personal Independence Payment statistics to January 2025 - GOV.UK. Figures are broken down by region and they are available for London.

Stephen Timms
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
18th Mar 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average waiting time was for a Personal Independence Payment reassessment after a claimant has reported improved health in the latest period for which data is available.

The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.

PIP clearance times for New Claims and Reassessments can be found in the latest Personal Independence Payment statistics to January 2025 - GOV.UK.

Stephen Timms
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
11th Feb 2025
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the (a) benefit cap and (b) two-child limit on single parents.

Delivering our manifesto commitment to tackle child poverty is an urgent priority for this Government, and the Ministerial Taskforce is working to publish a Child Poverty Strategy which will deliver lasting change.

The Strategy will look at all available levers across four key themes of increasing incomes, including considering social security reforms, reducing essential costs, increasing financial resilience; and better local support especially in the early years. This will build on the reform plans underway across Government and work underway in Devolved Governments.

Alison McGovern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
5th Nov 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many claims for pension credit there were from 28t October 2024 to 4 November 2024.

Data on how many Pension Credit applications made between 1 April 2024 and 22 September 2024 was recently published on gov.uk, Weekly Pension Credit claims received from 1 April 2024 to 22 September 2024 - GOV.UK.

On 28 October 2024, The Department announcedupdated Pension Credit applications and award statistics will be published on 28 November 2024. This publication will provide application volumes after 22 September 2024.

Emma Reynolds
Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)