Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the Annual Report of the Independent Monitoring Board at HMP/YOI Feltham, published on 12 March; and in particular, the finding that violence in classrooms and workshops has made young prisoners reluctant to attend education and rehabilitation sessions.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

We are grateful to the Independent Monitoring Board for its report, and for the vital work its members undertake to monitor the welfare of prisoners, to ensure that they are properly cared for. The report comments on the impact of staffing challenges affecting the regime at both HM/YOI Feltham A (young people under 18) and HMP/YOI Feltham B (adults and young adults over 18), as well as on the suitability of the education programmes available.

Since the end of the period covered by the Independent Monitoring Board’s report (1 September 2022- 31 August 2023), the staffing position at Feltham A has improved, and it now has the resources in place to provide a safe and productive regime for young people, with increased time-out-of-room.

The Youth Custody Service (YCS) has commissioned a resource review across all four public sector young offender institutions, to explore opportunities to make better use of the staff available in the current operating environment. This includes looking at the balance between management and frontline supervisory staff. The first review was at Feltham A in 2023, and a delivery plan following this review will be implemented shortly. The YCS will monitor the impact of this on service delivery. Support is also being provided at Feltham A to aid staff retention; sickness absence monitoring, with appropriate support, is a feature of regular management oversight.

The report of an Independent Review of Progress at Feltham B, conducted by HM Inspectorate of Prisons in January 2024, found that the prison had made reasonable progress in relation to encouraging positive behaviour. In addition, following a resource and risk assessment review, improved arrangements for purposeful activity are being put in place, to support the aim of reducing re-offending and increasing readiness for work, to help prisoners to gain employment upon release.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what was the reason for the decision to increase the length of the COP3 assessment of capacity form from 12 to 21 pages.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

Court of Protection forms are a matter for the judiciary. The Court of Protection Rules Committee in 2022 convened an expert Working Group to review the COP3 assessment of capacity form, supported by my officials. That group recommended substantial revisions to both the format and content.

Revisions were made to reflect the outcome of a Supreme Court case (Local Authority v JB), and more broadly to improve the form’s evidential value. While longer than its predecessor, the revised form aims to provide for a more rigorous assessment of a person’s capacity and greater scrutiny of each specific decision to be made on their behalf. The Rules Committee approved those revisions, and the revised form was published in July 2023.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government, following the announcement on 4 March of the establishment of an inquiry into third party litigation funding, when they expect to announce the terms of reference, the members of the inquiry panel and the timing of the review.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Lord Chancellor has invited the Civil Justice Council, the body responsible for overseeing and co-ordinating the modernisation of the civil justice system, to undertake a review of third-party litigation funding in England and Wales. The CJC has agreed to undertake the review and will be announcing terms of reference and other information shortly.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he is taking steps to help ensure digital (a) literacy and (b) understanding among legal professionals.

Answered by Mike Freer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Ministry of Justice is driving the digital transformation of the legal sector by providing £6 million for the LawtechUK programme, which aims to increase innovation and adoption of lawtech in the delivery of UK legal services. Lawtech describes technologies which aim to support, supplement, or replace traditional methods for the delivery of legal services.

LawtechUK offers a range of free education programmes designed to help organisations interested in harnessing the benefits of innovation for their legal operations. This includes Lawtech Bridge which brings together startups and established legal businesses to explore approaches to digital innovation.

LawtechUK also organises events aimed at raising awareness and increasing understanding of lawtech. For example, a recent Lawtech Student Fair brought together law firms, alternate legal service providers and lawtech providers with students and junior lawyers to help ensure the next generation of lawyers are digitally literate and embracing technology.

Whilst the Government aims to support a flourishing and innovative legal sector, the legal profession in England and Wales, together with its regulators, operate independently of the Government. The Solicitor’s Regulation Authority, the approved regulator for solicitors, supports innovation in the legal sector through their Innovate programme by helping law firms run their business creatively, supporting technology firms looking to develop products for legal businesses and bringing together law firms and innovators.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he is taking steps with Cabinet colleagues to help support the mental health of victims while they wait for rape trials.

Answered by Mike Freer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

Supporting victims of sexual violence and abuse is an absolute priority for this government.

We have taken a number of steps to support the mental health of victims while they wait for rape trials.

In December 2022, the Ministry of Justice launched the 24/7 Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Line to provide victims and survivors access to vital help and information whenever they need it.

In August 2023, we launched the recommissioned Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Fund, providing £26 million to over 60 specialist support services.

The Government is also quadrupling funding for victim and witness support services by 2024/25, up from £41 million in 2009/10. This includes additional ringfenced funding to increase the number of Independent Sexual Violence Advisors (ISVAs) and Independent Domestic Violence Advisors (IDVAs) to around 1,000 by 2024/25 - a significant increase on the number of ISVAs and IDVAs.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 21 March 2024 to Question 18955 on Family Conciliation Services, whether his Department monitors the number of therapists offering reunification therapy services in England and Wales who help with cases of family breakdown.

Answered by Mike Freer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Ministry of Justice does not hold data on the number of therapists offering reunification therapy in England and Wales.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to update the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

This government has recently reviewed and made significant changes to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (ROA) 1974. The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 amended the ROA to significantly reduce the length of time that someone needs to disclose most criminal records. These reforms will improve access to employment, which we know is a key factor in supporting rehabilitation and enabling former offenders to reintegrate into the community. Serious violent, sexual, or terrorist offences are excluded from these changes and continue to never be spent.

Where a person has a conviction disclosed, we are clear that this should not be an automatic bar to employment. Our guidance for employers states that they should make a balanced judgment on whether someone’s convictions make them unsuitable for a particular job. This should take into account the person’s age at the time of the offence, how long ago it took place, the nature of the offence and its relevance to the position in question, among other factors.

The ROA is kept under review. There are no current plans to make further changes, but please see further the answer I gave on 4 April to Question HL3362.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government, excluding sexual or violent offences, under what circumstances can someone subject to an Imprisonment for Public Protection sentence who has completed their license period have earlier, minor offences dropped from their record.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (the ROA) sets out when an offender is considered to be ‘rehabilitated’ for the purposes of the Act and the relevant rehabilitation periods for cautions and convictions (also referred to as when a caution or a conviction become ‘spent’). This does not mean that an offence is dropped from their record, rather that the offender only needs to disclose the spent caution or conviction in some circumstances.

The ROA also provides that where a person commits another offence before the first has become spent, then the rehabilitation periods are extended to the longest period. The ROA sets out that, as with other indeterminate sentences, IPP sentences can never become spent, regardless of whether the licence is terminated or not. The same, therefore, applies to any unspent caution or conviction imposed on the offender prior to the IPP sentence.

We have taken action through the Victims and Prisoners Bill to curtail IPP licence periods to give offenders the opportunity to move on with their lives. Whether the ROA should be reviewed in the light of these changes would require further consideration in the context of indeterminate sentences generally.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what is their strategy for ensuring public safety and efficacious offender management in respect of hyper-prolific offenders.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

For the most persistent and problematic offenders in the community, Integrated Offender Management has received a 3-year investment of up to £30 million to ensure those that commit burglary, robbery and theft offences receive robust cross-agency supervision by Police and Probation, and to commission services that will seek to support and address risks and needs of this cohort. We are also piloting three Intensive Supervision Courts which aim to target the root cause of offending behaviour through supervision and interventions delivered by a multi-agency team, overseen by a single judge who will regularly review each participant’s progress.

The courts have a wide range of options to deal with this group of offenders and relevant previous convictions are a statutory aggravating factor which the courts must consider at the point of sentencing. While custody will often be appropriate for these offenders, and in fact is the most common sentence given to prolific offenders, it is right that our courts have the ability to pass an appropriate sentence based on the case in front of them. Robust research has shown lower reoffending rates for sentences served in the community when compared to short custodial sentences.

Through the Better Outcomes through Linked Data (BOLD) programme, we are also taking steps to understand better which factors are most important in leading to reduced reoffending for prolific offenders, in order to help us target our approach for this cohort.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the early release of prisoners with a custodial sentence of less than 12 months, in order to alleviate overcrowding in the prison estate, on (1) reoffending rates, (2) public safety and (3) the operational effectiveness of the Probation Service.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

Delivering public protection and reducing reoffending is not just about custody. The Probation Service plays a vital role in protecting the public and reducing reoffending. For some less serious offenders, suspended and community sentences are more effective for rehabilitation.

Community requirements can help to deter reoffending, drive swift consequences for non-compliance, protect the public, and ensure offenders feel the weight of crime. Probation assess an offender’s risk prior to, and throughout sentences, to ensure that offenders are appropriately monitored and supervised, following robust risk assessment measures to ensure public safety.

Evidence shows that 55% of people given a custodial sentence of less than 12 months are convicted of further offences. For offenders punished with Suspended Sentence Orders with requirements that are served in the community, the reoffending rate is significantly lower at 24%. That is why we are introducing a presumption to suspend sentences of under 12 months, however judges will still be able to exercise their discretion to impose custody in exceptional circumstances. We have also included exemptions to the presumption where there is a significant risk of harm to an individual or where the offender has breached an order of the court, as is the case for many repeat and prolific offenders.

We know there are existing challenges and will be additional demands on the Probation Service as a result of the presumption to suspend short sentences. That is why we have increased funding for the Probation Service by an additional £155 million a year to recruit record levels of staff so that we can bring down caseloads and deliver better and more consistent supervision of offenders in the community. We continue to accelerate recruitment of Probation Officers, with over 4,000 trainees joining the service since 2020 and an overall increase in staffing levels across the board. We are also resetting probation to prioritise early engagement and supervision in the first two-thirds of an offender’s sentence, a critical period during which probation staff can have the greatest impact on public protection and reducing reoffending.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to expand the built prison estate to account for the estimated population increases to 2035 and beyond.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

We are delivering 20,000 additional, modern prison places, the largest prison build programme since the Victorian era, ensuring the right conditions are in place to rehabilitate prisoners, helping to cut crime and protect the public. These places are being delivered through the construction of six new prisons, as well as the expansion and refurbishment of the existing estate and temporary accommodation. To date, we have delivered c.5,900 of these places and are on track to have delivered c.10,000 by the end of 2025.

In October 2023, the Lord Chancellor announced funding of up to £30 million to start acquiring land that will be required for future prison capacity.

The Department has taken a number of steps to identify land for potential prison sites. We have commissioned a property agent to search the market for land in the North West and South East, our areas of greatest forecast demand for prison places; officials have started discussions with significant private and public sector landowners and continue to assess a shortlist of sites for planning risk and strategic and operational fit. In parallel, officials are engaged in strategic conversations with local and regional leaders to identify areas where communities would welcome the economic and employment benefits of a new prison.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have commissioned any research on a causal link between (1) an expansion of prison places and more custodial sentences, and (2) a reduction in violent and other serious crime episodes in a given period of time.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not commissioned research looking directly at any causal link of the kind mentioned in the question. However, the MoJ continues to carefully monitor the use of the prison estate and the sentencing framework to ensure that the most serious offenders are appropriately punished, and that the public are kept safe.

That is why we are embarking on the largest expansion of our prison estate since the Victorian era, investing £4 billion toward the delivery of 20,000 additional, modern places. By the end of 2025, we are on track to have delivered around 10,000 places in total.

Reducing crime and protecting the public, however, is not only about increased custody. Evidence shows that 55% of people given a custodial sentence of less than 12 months go on to be convicted of further proven offences in the following 12 months. For offenders punished with Suspended Sentence Orders with requirements that are served in the community, the reoffending rate is significantly lower at 24%. That is why we are introducing a presumption to suspend sentences of under 12 months. However, judges will still be able to exercise their discretion to impose custody in exceptional circumstances. We have also included exemptions to the presumption where there is a significant risk of harm to an individual or where the offender has breached an order of the court, as is the case for many repeat and prolific offenders.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government when they expect to resume the publication of timeliness data in respect of employment tribunals.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

HM Courts and Tribunals Service anticipate that publication of employment tribunal timeliness data will be at the end of the calendar year.

We advocate for the rigorous application of life sentences for child murder convictions, mandating a minimum of 30 years or a whole life order without the option for early parole.

I do not think that criminals who have been convicted and sentenced for their crime(s) should be allowed to appeal their sentence.

Millions of pounds are spent on legal aid every year. This is taxpayers' money - OUR money!

Financial institutions have had time to adapt to using online Lasting Power of Attorney registrations through the use of access codes, but some have not done so.

We want the Government to make it so:

1. Witnesses must be completely independent, and not be related in any way to either the donor or any of the proposed Attorneys.
2. Certificate providers must be medically qualified to assess the donor's cognitive abilities and understanding.

We believe the current complaint process makes it too difficult to complain about poor behaviour by judges. We think the examples of what complaints the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) can and can't investigate are contradictory, and too restrictive.

Change the law to ensure younger people face more serious repercussions for a prosecution for premeditated murder. We want a statutory minimum of 30 years, no matter the age.

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that only a man can commit rape. However, women can use other parts of the body to penetrate another person and use a male to penetrate themselves. Therefore, I think all penetration should be included in section 1 of the Act.

Found: representatives of the people should engage with the public on the platforms that they actually use.” 58 The Ministry

Found: representatives of the people should engage with the public on the platforms that they actually use.” 58 The Ministry

Found: For instance, it is understood that the Ministry of Justice has been in talks with Estonia about

Found: T 020 3334 3555 F 0870 761 7753 E https://contact -moj.service.justice.gov.uk/ www.gov.uk/moj 102

Found: The Legal Aid Agency, Ministry of Justice and National Audit Office need to come together with providers

Found: Migrants and a Decline in the Rule of Law (2013), 27 (2), JIANL, 122. 14 Ibid. 15 An arm of the Ministry

Found: Data and monitoring●The Ministry of Justice and the Home Office should routinely collect and publish

Found: Through the reforms introduced by LASPO, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) aimed to (1) discourage unnecessary

Found: therefore be possible to fill this gap at minimal extra cost. 6.We urge the Committee to ask the Ministry

Found: In addition, I made a Freedom of Information Act request of the MOJ on the 20th August 2022 as

Found: of Justice Family Mediation Scheme Voucher Scheme Analysis, March 2023, p11 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk

Found: such as housing neglect/disputes and welfare matters. 4 House of Commons Library, Spending of the Ministry

Found: 46% increase in the MOJ budget - crumbs for legal aid The figures show that the Ministry of Justice

Found: was pioneered and is now mainstream in many urban areas of the United States of America. 10.The MoJ

Found: As a result, and as the Ministry of Justice is already aware through pre-action correspondence, we

Found: that cutting funding or recalibrating eligibility with less people eligible for legal aid as the Ministry

Found: in provision, creating a postcode lottery for access to justice. 5.The NAO report notes that the Ministry

Found: of Justice, ‘Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales: the Government Response’ (June 2011)

Found: Early legal advice The MOJ has evidence that early legal advice is effective.

Found: Handbook (regarded as the go to reference for providers of welfare benefit advice and purchased by the MOJ

Found: In addition to the Home Office and DHSC, the other departments involved are the Ministry of Justice

Found: I was the lead lawyer on the GDPR negotiations when I was at the Ministry of Justice.

Found: in relation to this and placed in another department, such as a cross-departmental body or the Ministry

Found: Office in relation to this and placed in another department , such as a cross-departmental body or the Ministry

Found: Treasury ▪ HO - Home Office ▪ LAAs - Local Area Agreements ▪ LSPs - Local Strategic Partnerships ▪ MoJ

Found: Understanding the spatial variation of MoJ’s spend MoJ spends four times more in its largest spend area

Found: £100k DLUHC, HO, MoJ, DfE, DEFRA, DESNZ , HE, DWP East Sussex Tackling fuel poverty and

Found: DWP, the Department for Transport’s (DfT) Lower Thames Crossing and the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ

Found: From: HM Prison and Probation Service and Ministry of Justice Published 8 April 2024 Get

Found: and effectiveness of the work of probation, and youth offending services across England and Wales to Ministry

Found: We will support the Ministry of Justice, HM Courts and Tribunals Service, the legal profession, judiciary

Found: Youth Justice Board and Ministry of Justice (2021): ‘Assessing the needs of sentenced children in the

Found: Risk: our goal is for the Youth Justice Board to be assessed as ‘low risk’ to the work of the Ministry

Found: and Expenses CM3 1HZ 2,385.00 DLUHC PINS 22/02/2024 Steady State Service Provision Human Resources MINISTRY

Found: Levelling Up, Housing and Communities •Department for Education •Department of Health and Social Care •Ministry

Found: In preparation for this report, my officials worked closely with the Ministry of Just ice (MoJ) to

Found: Victims Taskforce Papers: May 2022 8 https://www.justice.govt.nz/about/news-and-media/news/budget-2022-ministry-of-justice